1 - BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual

For

BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn

VERSION: 3.0

DATE: 13-Jan-2018

Prepared By:

Software Group,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial versionKrzysztof Byrski1.025-Oct-2017
2Configuration parametersKrzysztof Byrski2.030-Nov-2017
3Updated Configuration Parameters listMatthew Leser3.013-Jan-2018

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document
FDDFunctional Design Document

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
1EA4 Software Naming Conventions01.01.00
2Software Design and Coding Standards2.1
3CF071A_BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_DesignSee Synergy Sub Project Version

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
None-

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

None

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ModulesNotes
None

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_Cfg.h

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

ParameterNotesSWC

BMWHWAGARBNANDEOTPOSN_NTCHWAGSNSRNOTTRIM_CNT_ENUM

(BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn\BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosnGeneral\NTCHWAGSNSRNOTTRIM)

Ntc Handwheel Angle Sensor Not TrimCF071A

BMWHWAGARBNANDEOTPOSN_NTCLOSSOFPINIOINAGZEROSPD_CNT_ENUM

(BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn\BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosnGeneral\NTCLOSSOFPINIOINAGZEROSPD)

Ntc Loss of Pinion Angle Zero SpeedCF071A

BMWHWAGARBNANDEOTPOSN_NTCLOSSOFPINIONAG_CNT_ENUM

(BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn\BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosnGeneral\NTCLOSSOFPINIONAG)

Ntc Loss of Pinion AngleCF071A

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
None

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
None

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Refer FDD

Required Global Data Outputs

Refer FDD

Specific Include Path present

No

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosnInit1NoneRTE (Init)
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosnPer1NoneRTE(2ms)
ClrBmwRackCentrToVehCentrOffs_OperNoneRTE(Event)
ClrVehCentrPosn_OperNoneRTE(Event)
SetVehCentrPosn_OperNoneRTE(Event)

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_START_SEC_CODECodeN/A

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM
N/A

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

*See DataDict.m

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

2 - BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_MDD

Module Design Document

For

BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn

12-Jul-2018

Prepared By:

Software Group,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA
Change History

DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
Initial VersionKrzysztof Byrski125-Oct-2017
Updated Local Functions argumentsKrzysztof Byrski208-Nov-2017
Updated Diagram and Function InputsMatthew Leser316-Jan-2018
Updated to Design version 3.0.0Krzysztof Byrski415-Mar-2018
Updated to Design version 5.1.0Marek Brykczyński529-Jun-2018
Updated graphic to include 2 new inputs, modified and added functionsShawn Penning612-Jul-2018


Table of Contents

T

1 Introduction 5

1.1 Purpose 5

1.2 Scope 5

2 BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn & High-Level Description 6

3 Design details of software module 7

3.1 Graphical representation of BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn 7

3.2 Data Flow Diagram 8

3.2.1 Component level DFD 8

3.2.2 Function level DFD 8

4 Constant Data Dictionary 9

4.1 Program (fixed) Constants 9

4.1.1 Embedded Constants 9

5 Software Component Implementation 10

5.1 Sub-Module Functions 10

5.1.1 Init: BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosnInit1 10

5.1.2 Per: BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosnPer1 10

5.2 Server Runables 11

5.2.1 ClrBmwRackCentrToVehCentrOffs_Oper 11

5.2.2 ClrVehCentrPosn_Oper 11

5.2.3 SetVehCentrPosn_Oper 11

5.3 Interrupt Functions 11

5.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 12

5.4.1 HwAgSnsrNotTrimNTC 12

5.4.2 HwPosnFltDetn 12

5.4.3 PinionAgFltTmr 12

5.4.4 OffsCorrnTmr 13

5.4.5 InitTmr 13

5.4.6 CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnSt 13

5.4.7 CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStOffsCmpd 14

5.4.8 CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStSubVal 14

5.4.9 CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStTmpCmpd 14

5.4.10 CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStOffsCorrn 15

5.4.11 CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStSigInvld 15

5.4.12 CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStIni 15

5.4.13 BmwMotAgOffsSelnStTranCase 16

5.4.14 ChkNrcvrlFlt 16

5.4.15 TurnCntrCorrlnStsTmr 16

5.4.16 ChkTurnCntrCorrlnStsCdn 16

5.4.17 ProcessBmwQuadRotorOffs1 16

5.4.18 ProcessBmwQuadRotorOffs2 17

5.4.20 ProcessBmwQuadOffsSts 17

5.4.21 ActvtLpFil 17

5.4.22 CalcBmwPinionAgOffs 17

5.4.23 BmwMotAgSelnStOffsCmpd 18

5.4.24 BmwMotAgSelnStSigInvld 19

5.4.25 PinionAgCalc 19

5.4.26 ClrNotCmplPinionAgFlg 19

5.4.27 CalcEot 20

5.4.28 SetBmwRackCentrToVehCentrOffs 20

5.4.29 HndlgNTC 21

5.5 GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions 22

6 Known Limitations with Design 23

7 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 24

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 25

Appendix B Glossary 26

Appendix C References 27

Introduction

Purpose

Module Design Document for CF071A_BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_Impl.

Scope

The following definitions are used throughout this document:

  • Shall: indicates a mandatory requirement without exception in compliance.

  • Should: indicates a mandatory requirement; exceptions allowed only with documented justification.

  • May: indicates an optional action.

BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn & High-Level Description

This function will be responsible for determining the hand wheel position using the motor position to provide an estimate of the hand wheel position.

Design details of software module

Graphical representation of BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn

Data Flow Diagram

Refer FDD

Component level DFD

N/A

Function level DFD

N/A

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

None

Software Component Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

The sub-module functions are grouped based on similar functionality that needs to be executed in a given “State” of the system (refer States and Modes). For a given module, the MDD will identify the type and number of sub-modules required. The sub-module types are described below.

Init: Init1

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Module Outputs

Refer FDD

Per: Per1

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

Refer FDD

Server Runables

ClrBmwRackCentrToVehCentrOffs_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

ClrVehCentrPosn_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

SetVehCentrPosn_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

Interrupt Functions

None

Module Internal (Local) Functions

HwAgSnsrNotTrimNTC

Function NameHwAgSnsrNotTrimNTCTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNone
Return ValueHwAgSnsrNotTrimFlt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

HwPosnFltDetn

Function NameHwPosnFltDetnTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedMotAgVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
HwAgSnsrNotTrimFlt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValuePinionAgFltTmrElpd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

PinionAgFltTmr

Function NamePinionAgFltTmrTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedHwAgSnsrNotTrimFlt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValuePinionAgFltTmrElpd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

OffsCorrnTmr

Function NameOffsCorrnTmrTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNone
Return ValueOffsCorrnTmrElpd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

InitTmr

Function NameInitTmrTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNone
Return ValueAllwExitFromInit_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnSt

Function NameCalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedTurnCntrVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
BmwQuadOffsSts_Cnt_T_enumenum015
PinionAgFltTmrElpd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
OffsCorrnTmrElpd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
HwAgNotVldFltPrsnt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AllwExitFromInit_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AllwTran_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueNone

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStOffsCmpd

Function NameCalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStOffsCmpdTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedTurnCntrVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
BmwQuadOffsSts_Cnt_T_enumenum015
HwAgNotVldFltPrsnt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AllwTran_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueNone

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStSubVal

Function NameCalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStSubValTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBmwQuadOffsSts_Cnt_T_enumenum015
HwAgNotVldFltPrsnt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AllwTran_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueNone

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStTmpCmpd

Function NameCalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStTmpCmpdTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBmwQuadOffsSts_Cnt_T_enumenum015
HwAgNotVldFltPrsnt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AllwTran_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueNone

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStOffsCorrn

Function NameCalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStOffsCorrnTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedOffsCorrnTmrElpd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
HwAgNotVldFltPrsnt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AllwTran_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueNone

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStSigInvld

Function NameCalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStSigInvldTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedTurnCntrVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
PinionAgFltTmrElpd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
HwAgNotVldFltPrsnt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AllwTran_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueNone

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

CalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStIni

Function NameCalcBmwMotAgOffsSelnStIniTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedTurnCntrVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
HwAgNotVldFltPrsnt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AllwExitFromInit_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AllwTran_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueNone

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

BmwMotAgOffsSelnStTranCase

Function NameBmwMotAgOffsSelnStTranCaseTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBmwQuadOffsSts_Cnt_T_enumenum015
HwAgSnsrNotTrimFlt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
MotAgTurnCntrDeg_MotDeg_T_f32float32-8294400083008800
TurnCntrVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
PrevLoopBmwMotAgSelnSt_Cnt_T_enumenum215
BmwQuadRotorOffs_MotRev_T_s08sint8-127127
MotAgCumvAlgnMrf_MotDeg_T_f32float32-262144262143.9998
Return ValuePinionAgTarConf_Uls_T_f32float3201
MotPosnDegArbd_MotDeg_T_f32float32- 8320614483270944>

ChkNrcvrlFlt

Function NameChkNrcvrlFltTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNtc8CSts_Cnt_T_enumenum12
Ntc8ESts_Cnt_T_enumenum12
Return Value----

TurnCntrCorrlnStsTmr

Function NameTurnCntrCorrlnStsTmrTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedTurnCntrCorrlnSts_Cnt_T_u08enum03
Return Value----

ChkTurnCntrCorrlnStsCdn

Function NameChkTurnCntrCorrlnStsCdnTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedTurnCntrCorrlnSts_Cnt_T_u08enum03
Return Value----

ProcessBmwQuadRotorOffs1

Function NameProcessBmwQuadRotorOffsTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBmwQuadOffsSts_Cnt_T_enum, ,Enum015
BmwQuadRotorOffs_MotRev_T_s08sint8-127127
ChgdValDetd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return Value----

ProcessBmwQuadRotorOffs2

Function NameProcessBmwQuadRotorOffsTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBmwQuadOffsSts_Cnt_T_enum, ,Enum015
BmwQuadRotorOffs_MotRev_T_s08sint8-127127
ChgdValDetd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return Value----

ProcessBmwQuadOffsSts

Function NameProcessBmwQuadOffsStsTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBmwQuadOffsSts_Cnt_T_enumenum015
ChgdValDetd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return Value----

ActvtLpFil

Function NameActvtLpFilTypeMinMax
Arguments Passed----
Return Value----

CalcBmwPinionAgOffs

Function NameCalcBmwPinionAgOffsTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBmwPinionAgOffs_HwDeg_T_f32float32-4545
BmwPinionAgOffsSts_Cnt_T_enumenum14
Return Value-BmwPinionAgOffsOutp_HwDeg_T_f32float32-14401440

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

BmwMotAgSelnStOffsCmpd

Function NameBmwMotAgSelnStOffsCmpdTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBmwQuadRotorOffs_MotRev_T_s08sint8-127127
Return ValuePinionAgTarConf_Uls_T_f32float3201

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

BmwMotAgSelnStSigInvld

Function NameBmwMotAgSelnStSigInvldTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedTurnCntrVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
PrevLoopBmwMotAgSelnSt_Cnt_T_enumenum215
HwAgSnsrNotTrimFlt_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
MotAgTurnCntrDeg_MotDeg_T_f32float32-8294400083008800
Return ValuePinionAgTarConf_Uls_T_f32float3200

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

PinionAgCalc

Function NamePinionAgCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedOffsCpmpdMotPosn_MotDeg_T_f32float32-8298972083054520
CmplncErrMotToPinion_HwDeg_T_f32float32-55
Return ValueBmwPinionAg_HwDeg_T_f32float32-14401440

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

ClrNotCmplPinionAgFlg

Function NameClrNotCmplPinionAgFlgTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedLongTermRackCentrCmpl_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueNone

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

CalcEot

Function NameCalcEotTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedTotRackTrvl_HwDeg_T_f32float32-28802880
LongTermRackCentrCmpl_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueHwAgEotCw_HwDeg_T_f32float32360900
HwAgEotCcw_HwDeg_T_f32float32-900-360
HwAgCwDetd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
HwAgCcwDetd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

SetBmwRackCentrToVehCentrOffs

Function NameSetBmwRackCentrToVehCentrOffsTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedLongTermRackCentrCmpl_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
RackCentrPinionAg_HwDeg_T_f32float32-14401440
Return ValueNone

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

HndlgNTC

Function NameHndlgNTCTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedVehSpdVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
VehSpd_Kph_T_f32float320350
BmwVehSpdSts_Cnt_T_enumenum115
DiKineIntegrityTest_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueNone

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions

None

Known Limitations with Design

None

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

None

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation or AcronymDescription
FDDFunctional Design Document. (See references)

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

  • ISO 9000

  • ISO/IEC 12207

  • ISO/IEC 15504

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)

  • ISO/IEC 15288

  • ISO 26262

  • IEEE Standards

  • SWEBOK

  • PMBOK

  • Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

TermDefinitionSource
MDDModule Design Document
DFDData Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #TitleVersion
1AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mapping (Link:AUTOSAR_SWS_MemoryMapping.pdf)v1.4.0 R4.0 Rev 3
2MDD Guideline EA401.00.01
3EA4 Software Naming Conventions01.01.00
4Software Design and Coding Standards2.1
5CF071A_BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_DesignSee Synergy Sub Project Version

3 - BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_Review


Overview

Cover Page
Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Davinci Files
Source Code
PolySpace
help
Version History


Sheet 1: Cover Page


Nexteer Automotive Confidential Proprietary Information
Do Not Copy/Distribute Without Prior Permission


EA4 Nexteer SWC Implementation Peer Review Checklist
For
BMW FAAR WE














Prepared By:
Software Development Team
Nexteer Automotive
Tychy, Poland

EA4 Nexteer SWC Implementation Peer Review Checklist
Version: 2.02
Date: 28-Jun-2018 © Nexteer Automotive

Sheet 2: Summary Sheet
























Rev 2.0227-Jun-18

Nexteer EA4 SWC Implementation Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Component Short Name:



BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn
Revision / Baseline:


CF071A_BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_Design_6.3.0

























Change Owner:


Marek Brykczyński
Work CR ID:


EA4#26164



























Modified File Types:



Check the file types that needed modification for the Work CR(s); macros for the check boxes will populate the appropriate checklist tabs for the review.

















































































































































Review Checklist Summary:






























Reviewed:




At start of review, all items below should be marked "No". At the end of the review, all items should be marked "Yes" or "N/A" where N/A indicates the reviewers have reviewed the existing (unchanged) item and confirmed no updates were needed for the Work CR(s).












































N/AMDD


YesSource Code


YesPolySpace


N/AAuto Code



































N/AIntegration Manual


YesDavinci Files


N/ASIL Testing



































































All required reviewers participated





Yes













































Comments:





























































































Time spent ( to the nearest half hour)








review preparation



review meeting


review follow-up






Change owner:









0.5



0.5


0





Component developer reviewers:









0.5



0.5


0


2


Other reviewers:









0



0


0





Total hours









1



1


0


2





























Content reviewed

























Lines of code:


changes

Elements of .arxml content:




changes

Pages of documentation:



changes



















































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include SWC Owner and/or SWC Design author and Integrator and/or SW Lead as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.

Each peer review shall start with a clean copy of the latest peer review checklist template. Save in the doc folder of the component implementation, with the file name in the format SWCShortName_Review.xlsx. If the existing review in Synergy has a different name, the name must be changed IN SYNERGY (rather than by syncing in a new file with the new name) so that the file history will be properly maintained.

Before the peer review, the change owner shall: (NOTE - time for completing these items is to be counted as the Change Owner Review Prep Time)
o Review the previous component peer review and copy any relevant comments to the new review sheet.
o Review all checklist items and make all corrections needed, so that the component is ready for peer review. The expectation is that peer review should find very few issues,
because the change owner has already used the checklist to ensure the component changes are complete and correct.
o Fill in all file name and version information as needed on peer review checklist tabs (file names may be copied from the previous peer review where appropriate)
o Fill in checklist answers (Yes/No/NA pulldowns) ONLY on those items which are NA for the current change. All other checklist items should be blank going into the review
meeting.

During the peer review meeting:
o For each page of the review, first review the items already marked as N/A for this change, to confirm that reviewers agree with this assessment; change the checklist box to
blank if it is found that the item does apply.
o Then review the items with the checklist box blank. After reviewing each of these items, the checklist box will be marked as "Yes", or the checklist box will be marked as
"No" with needed rework indicated or with rationale indicated.
o If any items are marked "No" with rationale indicated, this must be approved by a software supervisor or the software manager; there is a line in the "Review Board" section
of each tab to indicate who approved the "No" items on that tab.

Sheet 3: Synergy Project






















Rev 2.0227-Jun-18

























Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:
naming convention




































Project contains necessary subprojects








Yes
Comments:






































Project contains the correct version of subprojects








Yes
Comments:






































Design subproject is correct version








Yes
Comments:








































.gpj file in tools folder matches .gpj generated by TL109 script








Yes
Comments:









































File/folder structure is correct per documentation in









Yes
Comments:

TL109A_SwcSuprt






































General Notes / Comments:
























































Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Marek Brykczyński


Review Date :

07/25/18
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Krzysztof Byrski


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Rationale/justification for items marked "No" approved by:












































Sheet 4: Davinci Files






















Rev 2.0227-Jun-18
Nexteer SWC Implementation Peer Review Meeting Log (Davinci Review)



























Quality Check Items:






































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Only StdDef Port interfaces and datatypes are used









Yes
Comments:

(compare against TL107B to ensure only implementation













data types are used)















































OBSOLETE/OBSELETE doesn’t appear in any arxml file









Yes
Comments:








































Do all port interface names end in PortIf and a sequence









Yes
Comments:

number





































Non-program-specific components saved









Yes
Comments:

in Autosar 4.0.3 format





































For components with generated configurable content:












N/A
Comments: N/A for changes
*Cfg.arxml.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator imported the












change correctly















































*Cfg.h.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator generates









N/A
Comments: N/A for changes

the configuration header file(s) correctly





































All changed files have been compared against previous









N/A
Comments:

versions (If available) and changes match changes













needed as described by the work CR(s), all parent CRs























and parent anomalies, and the SWC Design change log.















































Davinci files accurately implement SWC Design (DataDict.m









Yes
Comments:

file) in all areas where arxml was changed and/or the













DataDict.m file was changed as shown by























comparing the DataDict.m from the current SWC Design























with the DataDict.m used in the previous implementation.























(This is NOT always the predecessor.)
















































Automated validation check is performed with no issues found










Yes
Comments:








































Naming conventions followed. All names should









N/A
Comments: N/A for changes

match DataDict.m





































Sender/Receiver port properties match DataDict.m file









N/A
Comments: N/A for changes

(name, data type, direction)





































Calibration port properties match DataDict.m file









N/A
Comments:

(name, data type)





































Sender/Receiver port initialization values match









Yes
Comments:

DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts













for fixed point types















































Calibration port initialization values match









N/A
Comments:N/A for changes

DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts













for fixed point types















































Mapping set and all unused items have been









N/A
Comments:

removed





































All sender/receiver port read/writes using "Write (explicit)"










N/A
Comments: N/A for changes

and "Read (explicit by argument)"(List justification if not)





































Runnable calling frequencies match DataDict.m file









N/A
Comments: N/A for changes








































Runnable port access matches the DataDict.m file










N/A
Comments: N/A for changes








































DataDict.m display variables: created as









N/A
Comments: N/A for changes

PerInstanceMemory. Name and data type match DataDict.m file.





































Per Instance Memory names and data types









N/A
Comments:

match DataDict.m file





































NVM blocks match DataDict.m file









N/A
Comments:

(Named per naming convention. Default block













used if specified in DataDict.m file. Data type























matches DatatDict.m file)















































Component is correct component type









Yes
Comments:




































































General Notes / Comments:





























































Review Board:



























Change Owner:

Marek Brykczyński

Review Date :

07/25/18
Component Type :


Application




























Lead Peer Reviewer:


Krzysztof Byrski

Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes




























































Integrator and or
SW lead:
Krzysztof Byrski

Comments:
















































Other Reviewer(s):




































































Rationale/justification for items marked "No" approved by:














































Sheet 5: Source Code






















Rev 2.0227-Jun-18
Nexteer SWC Implementation Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn.c
Source File Revision:


13
Header File Name:


-
Header File Revision:


-

























MDD Name:


BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_MDD.docx
Revision:
6

























SWC Design Name:


CF071A_BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn_Design
Revision:
6.3.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No

































EA4 Common Naming Convention followed:











Version:
























EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:











Version:

























for variable names







Yes
Comments:







































for constant names







Yes
Comments:







































for function names







Yes
Comments:







































for other names (component, memory







Yes
Comments:

mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)



































Verified no possibility of uninitialized variables being








Yes
Comments:
written to component outputs or IRVs




































Any requirements traceability tags have been removed








Yes
Comments:
from at least the changed areas of code




































All variables are declared at the function level.








Yes
Comments:






































Synergy version matches change history








Yes
Comments:
and Version Control version in file comment block




































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:
(including any anomaly number(s) being fixed) and












Work CR number














































Code accurately implements SWC Design (Document








Yes
Comments:
or Model) in all areas where code was changed and/or












Simulink model was color-coded as changed and/or






















mentioned in SWC Design change log.













































Code comparison against previous version matches








N/A
Comments:
changes needed as described by the work CR(s), all












parent CRs and parent anomalies, and the SWC






















Design change log.














































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings








Yes
Comments:
(and verified for all possible combinations












of any conditionally compiled code)














































Component.h is included








N/A
Comments:






































All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








Yes
Comments:
only allowed in Nexteer library components)




































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version:

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







Yes
Comments:

and have been updated for the change: [N40] and












all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:

standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]




































Function comment blocks are per standards and







Yes
Comments:

contain correct information: [N43]




































Code formatting (indentation, placement of







Yes
Comments:

braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],












[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







Yes
Comments:

"magic numbers": [N12]




































Memory mapping for non-RTE code







Yes
Comments:

is per standard




































All access of motor control loop data uses macros







N/A
Comments:

generated by the motor control manager




































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







N/A
Comments:

finite loop iterations: [N63]




































All divides protect against divide by zero







N/A
Comments:

if needed: [N65]




































All integer division and modulus operations







N/A
Comments:

handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]




































All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







Yes
Comments:

including all use of fixed point macros and












timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsigned conversions ensure the.







Yes
Comments:

float value is non-negative: [N67]




































All conversions between signed and unsigned







Yes
Comments:

types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]




































All pointer dereferencing protects against







Yes
Comments:

null pointer if needed: [N70]




































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







Yes
Comments:

defined in the SWC Design DataDict.m file : [N53]




































All code is mapped with SWC Design (all SWC







Yes
Comments:

Design subfunctions and/or model blocks identified












with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some SWC Design subfunction and/or model block):






















[N40]














































Any other violations of design and coding









N/A
Comments:

standards noticed during the review are noted in the












comments section for rework.













































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








N/A
Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers









for any SWC Design corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:

















































































Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Marek Brykczyński


Review Date :

07/25/18
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Krzysztof Byrski


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes










































































































SWC owner and/or
SWC Design author:
Patryk Kołacki



Comments:
















































Integrator and or
SW lead:
Krzysztof Byrski



Comments:









































































Unit test co-ordinator:







Comments:
























































Other Reviewer(s):

































































Rationale/justification for items marked "No" approved by:





































































Sheet 6: PolySpace






















Rev 2.0227-Jun-18
Nexteer SWC Implementation Peer Review Meeting Log (PolySpace Review)




























Source File Name:


BmwHwAgArbnAndEotPosn.c




Source File Revision:


13

Source File Name:


-




Source File Revision:


-

Source File Name:


-




Source File Revision:


-




























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:







1.04







Poly Space version:



2013b





TL109A sub project version:

2.5.0



































Quality Check Items:








































Rationale is required for all answers of No





































tools/local folders' header files are appropriate and










Yes
Comments:

function prototypes match the latest component version










































100% Compliance to the EA4 Static Analysis

Yes
Comments:

Compliance Guideline










































Are previously added justification and deviation










N/A
Comments:

comments still appropriate










































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved










Yes
Comments:

deviation tags










































For any component source files (.c, .h, generated Cfg.c and Cfg.h)












N/A
Comments:

with conditional compilation, has Polyspace been run with all
















combinations of build constants that can be used together in a build?

























(Note which conditional compilation results have been archived)




















































Codemetrics count OK










Yes
Comments:

for all functions in the component per Design















and Coding Standards rule [N47]




















































MISRA AGC guidelines selected for Polyspace (N/A for hand











N/A
Comments:

coded components)
































































































General Notes / Comments:































































Review Board:




























Change Owner:

Marek Brykczyński




Review Date :

07/17/18


































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Krzysztof Byrski




Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes

































Other Reviewer(s):


















































































Rationale/justification for items marked "No" approved by:
















































Sheet 7: help

Summary sheet:






Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should match the component short name from the DataDict.m fileand the middle part of the Synergy project name, e.g. Assi for the SF001A_Assi_Impl Synergy project







Intended Use: Identify the implementation baseline name intended to be used for the changed component when changes are approved E.g. SF001A_Assi_Impl_1.2.0





Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) being reviewed




Intended Use: Identify the Implementation Work CR whose work is being reviewed (may be more than one)




Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed.





Source code:





This item includes looking at all layers of Simulink model for possible color coding not reflected at a higher level, and includes looking at any intermediate SWC Design versions between the version being implemented and the version that was included as a subproject in the previous implementation.
Intended Use: Synergy version number of the file being reviewed. (Version number that Synergy displays on the checked out or unmodified
file in the working project)





Intended Use: Synergy version number of the file being reviewed. (Version number that Synergy displays on the checked out or unmodified file in the working project)



Intended Use: Synergy version number of the file being reviewed. (Version number that Synergy displays on the checked out or unmodified file in the working project)







Intended Use: For SWC Designs, list the Synergy baseline number (just the number part of the Synergy baseline name) of the SWC Design baseline being implemented. E.g., for SF001A_Assi_Design_1.3.1, this field would say "1.3.1"









Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s).















Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored).













Intended Use: list version/revision of latest released Software Design and Coding Standards document.





Davinci Files





Intended Use: Identify if previous version was compared and only the expected change(s) was present. This is for text files only, not binary or GUIs








Polyspace





eg. 2013b





Integration manual





Intended Use: Identify which file is being reviewed





Intended Use: Identify which version of the integration manual has been reviewed.



Synergy





Refer to EA4 Common Naming Conventions document, section “Synergy Baseline Names for core components”





The following subprojects should be included for all component implementations:
• AR200A_ArSuprt_Impl
• AR201A_ArCplrSuprt_Impl
• TL101A_CptRteGen
• TL103A_CplrSuprt
• TL109A_SwcSuprt
• Corresponding _Design project used for the implementation

The following subprojects should be included as needed by each component:
• AR10xx_Nxtr*_Impl library components as needed by each component
• AR202x_MicroCtrlrSuprt_Impl as needed (for register header files for components making direct register access)[add notes about when to add a stub header file]
• Xx999x_xxxxGlbPrm_Impl as needed by each component
• TL105A_Artt for components with generated content

The following should NOT be included as subprojects:
• TL107x_DavinciSuprt (aka StdDef)
• TL100A_QACSuprt (QAC subproject was previously included but should be removed going forward)
• Any other component (not mentioned anywhere above) whose .h file is needed. For these components, a “stub” .h file should be created, containing only the multiple include protection and the definitions and function prototypes actually needed by the component with the #include, and placed in the “including” component’s local\include folder.

misc in Summary sheet





(integrator, designer, unit test coordinator, etc.)





For a new component, use number of lines in all source files reviewed, including files in the src and include folders and any generated cfg.h and cfg.c files.  For a changed component, try to add up how many lines, including comments and blank lines, were in the changed areas that were reviewed. Not just the actual changed lines, but the number of lines in the blocks of code you had to look at to review the change.
add up the number of ports, number of PIM variables, number if IRVs, number of runnables, number of NVM blocks in the component  (all of them for review of a new component, the new and modified ones for review of a change)
add the number of pages in the MDD and integration manual for a new component; for a modified component, count the number of pages that contained a change.












ReviewerRequired attendance for this type of changeReview spreadsheet tab(s)
Component group peerAllAll
Component owner and/or SWC Design author*Initial creation of any new component
*Simulink model changes (any change to the model other than just updating the change log)
Source
Integrator and/or SW lead of first program planning to use the component*Initial creation of any new component
*new or changed NVM blocks, NVM datatypes, or NVM usage (added or removed or changed NVM API calls in any runnable)
*Major rev (X changed in the X.Y.X design baseline number; means there was a component interface change)
*new or changed config params
*all MM component changes
Davinci files, Integration manual, source for NVM changes and for all MM component changes.
Unit test coordinatorFixes for coverage issuesSource
SQANoneNone








For each reviewer category listed on each tab, there should either be
• the name of the reviewer who attended
or
• a comment indicating
o why that reviewer was not required for this change
or
o who approved holding the review without that required reviewer (approval must
be from the software manager or a software supervisor)


Sheet 8: Version History















Template Version History





VersionDescriptionAuthor(s)Revision DateApproved ByApproved DateStatus
1.0Initial VersionSW Engineering team24-May-15NANAReleased
1.01Changed name to be EA4 specificSW Engineering team25-Jun-15NANAReleased
1.02Modified Summary Sheet General Guidelines, Clarified wording on first item in Synergy project sheet.SW Engineering team30-Jul-15NANAReleased
1.02Made corrections and clarifications to Source Code check list.SW Engineering team30-Jul-15NANAReleased
1.02updated Davinci, MDD, and Polyspace/QAC tabsSW Engineering team30-Jul-15NANAReleased
1.03Aligned to portal version guidelinesUmesh Sambhari21-Nov-17NANAReleased
2.00Summary sheet template:
Changed title to indicate Implementation Peer Review
Corrected and/or clarified mouse hover comments, added instructions, renamed some fields.
Changed the default setting to "No" on the items reviewed
SW Engineering team29-Nov-17Lonnie Newton, Steven Horwath, Kevin Smith, Lucas Wendling, Vinod ShankarNAReleased
Source code template:
Removed hyperlink for naming conventions, corrected name of naming conventions document, added version field for naming conventions document.
Changed item about requirements tags to reflect that they should be removed
Added clarification that all combinations of conditionally compiled code must be checked
Item about accurately implementing SWC Design is modified and a new item added, both to clarify where to look when determining needed changes.
Added point for version of common naming conventions
Reworded multiple items for clarity
SW Engineering team29-Nov-17
Synergy project template:
added items for file/folder structure
added point on .gpj file in tools folder
SW Engineering team29-Nov-17
Davinci files template:
Clarified the StdDef item
Added new item for OBSOLETE
Clarified item on datadict.m comparison
Removed the references to .m file helper tool
Updated to reflect that all component should now use only implementation data types
Added points on PIMs and NVMs
SW Engineering team29-Nov-17
All template tabs:
Added/clarified/removed mouse hover comments.
Updated Review Board section
Removed the gridlines from all tabs
Updated titles to say "Nexteer SWC Implementation Peer Review"
Changed all occurences of "FDD" to "SWC Design"
SW Engineering team29-Nov-17
2.01Added a help tab and appropriate links
Added field on Summary sheet to report hours spent and content reviewed
Changed wording in an item in Polyspace tab and Source code tab
SW Engineering team21-Feb-18Lonnie Newton, Steven Horwath, Kevin Smith, Lucas Wendling, Vinod Shankar21-Feb-18Released
2.02Added a new tab for auto code as well as SIL testing
Corrected some of the missing hyperlinks
and formatting
Added referencing for items under Reviewed in Summary Sheet tab
SW Engineering team27-Jun-18Lonnie Newton, Steven Horwath
PCWG
28-Jun-18Released