Sr. No.	Title	Version
1	MDD Guidelines	Software Process Release 04.02.01
1	Software Naming Conventions	Software Process Release 04.02.01
3	Design and Coding Standards	Software Process Release 04.02.01
4	ES221A_HwTq5Meas_Design	See Synergy subproject version

Dependencies

SWCs

Module	Required Feature
HwTq5Meas	None.

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

Please refer to the FDD.

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

Modules	Notes
None

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

CDD_HwTq5Meas_Cfg.h

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

Parameter	Notes	SWC
None

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR Name	VIM #	Priority Dependency	Notes
None

Manual Configuration Changes

Constant

Notes

SWC

Note: Temporarily CDD_HwTq5Meas_Cfg.h

file can be copied from the contract folder. Later revision will have the Davinci configuration parameter to generate the file.

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Please refer to the FDD.

Required Global Data Outputs

Please refer to the FDD.

Specific Include Path present

Yes

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

Init	Scheduling Requirements	Trigger
HwTq5MeasInit1	None	RTE/ Init

Runnable	Scheduling Requirements	Trigger
HwTq5MeasPer1	None	Motor control runnable
HwTq5MeasPer2	None	RTE/2 ms
HwTq5MeasPer3	None	RTE/100 ms
HwTq5MeasPer4	None	RTE/100 ms
HwTq5AutTrim_Oper	None	On event
HwTq5ClrSnsrSca_Oper	None	On event
HwTq5ClrTrim_Oper	None	On event
HwTq5ReadSnsrSca_Oper	None	On event
HwTq5ReadTrim_Oper	None	On event
HwTq5TrimPrfmdSts_Oper	None	On event
HwTq5WrSnsrSca_Oper	None	On event
HwTq5WrTrim_Oper	None	On event
HwTq5SnsrScaPrfmdSts_Oper	None	On event

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory Section	Contents	Notes
CDD_HwTq5Meas_MotCtrl_START_SEC_CODE	Motor Control runnables

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

Feature	RAM	ROM
None

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

HwTq5Offs and HwTq5Sca (See DataDict.m)

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

None

2 - HwTq5Meas_MDD

Module Design Document

For

HwTq5Meas

Oct 30, 2017

Prepared For:

Software Engineering

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Prepared By:

TATA ELXSI,

TRIVANDRUM, INDIA

Change History

Description	Author	Version	Date
Initial Version	Krishna Anne	1.0	10-Jun-2016
Added a new server runnable	Avinash James	2.0	01-Dec-2016
Updated as per FDD revision 1.10.0	TATA	3.0	30-10-2017

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 5

1.1 Purpose 5

2 HwTq5Meas & High-Level Description 6

3 Design details of software module 7

3.1 Graphical representation of HwTq5Meas 7

3.2 Data Flow Diagram 7

3.2.1 Component level DFD 7

3.2.2 Function level DFD 7

4 Constant Data Dictionary 8

4.1 Program (fixed) Constants 8

4.1.1 Embedded Constants 8

5 Software Component Implementation 9

5.1.1 Init: HwTq5Meas_Init1 9

5.1.1.1 Design Rationale 9

5.1.1.2 Module Outputs 9

5.1.2 Per: HwTq5Meas_Per1 9

5.1.2.1 Design Rationale 9

5.1.3 Per: HwTq5Meas_Per2 9

5.1.3.1 Design Rationale 9

5.1.4 Per: HwTq5Meas_Per3 9

5.1.4.1 Design Rationale 9

5.1.5 Per: HwTq5Meas_Per4 9

5.1.5.1 Design Rationale 9

5.2 Server Runables 9

5.2.1 HwTq5AutTrim_Oper 9

5.2.1.1 Design Rationale 9

5.2.2 HwTq5ClrSnsrSca_Oper 9

5.2.2.1 Design Rationale 9

5.2.3 HwTq5ClrTrim_Oper 10

5.2.3.1 Design Rationale 10

5.2.4 HwTq5ReadSnsrSca_Oper 10

5.2.4.1 Design Rationale 10

5.2.5 HwTq5ReadTrim_Oper 10

5.2.5.1 Design Rationale 10

5.2.6 HwTq5TrimPrfmdSts_Oper 10

5.2.6.1 Design Rationale 10

5.2.7 HwTq5WrSnsrSca_Oper 10

5.2.7.1 Design Rationale 10

5.2.8 HwTq5WrTrim_Oper 10

5.2.8.1 Design Rationale 10

5.2.9 HwTq5SnsrScaPrfmdSts_Oper 10

5.2.9.1 Design Rationale 10

5.3 Module Internal (Local) Functions 10

5.3.1 Local Function #1 10

5.3.1.1 Design Rationale 11

5.3.1.2 Processing 11

6 Known Limitations with Design 12

7 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 13

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 14

Appendix B Glossary 15

Appendix C References 16

Introduction

Purpose

MDD for HwTq5Meas.

HwTq5Meas & High-Level Description

Design details of software module

Please refer to the FDD.

Graphical representation of HwTq5Meas

Data Flow Diagram

Component level DFD

Function level DFD

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

Constant Name	Resolution	Units	Value
Please refer to the FDD

Software Component Implementation

Init: HwTq5Meas_Init1

Design Rationale

None

Module Outputs

None

Per: HwTq5Meas_Per1

Design Rationale

Rte_Pim_HwTq5RawFastAdcIdxCntr is used in this periodic as a counter that increments from 0 to 7 and is used to write to an output buffer MotCtrlHwTq5RawFastAdcBuf accessed by Motor Control Manager. Whereas the FDD describes this counter as 1 based indexing that increments from 1 till 8. Effective they are same in terms of functionality.

Per: HwTq5Meas_Per2

Design Rationale

None

Per: HwTq5Meas_Per3

Design Rationale

None

Per: HwTq5Meas_Per4

Design Rationale

None

Server Runables

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

Rte_Pim_HwTq5PrevRollgCntr is used as a rolling counter. Hence roll over is intentional..

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation or Acronym	Description

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

ISO 9000
ISO/IEC 12207
ISO/IEC 15504
Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)
Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)
ISO/IEC 15288
ISO 26262
IEEE Standards
SWEBOK
PMBOK
Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

Term	Definition	Source
MDD	Module Design Document
DFD	Data Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #	Title	Version
1	AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mapping (Link:AUTOSAR_SWS_MemoryMapping.pdf)	v1.3.0 R4.0 Rev 2
2	MDD Guideline	EA4 01.00.00
3	Software Naming Conventions.doc	1.0
4	Software Design and Coding Standards.doc	2.1
5	ES221A_HwTq5Meas_Design	See Synergy subproject version

3 - HwTq5Meas_PeerReviewChecklist

Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Davinci Files
Source Code
MDD
PolySpace

Sheet 1: Summary Sheet

Rev 1.2

8-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet

Synergy Project Name:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. ES221A_HwTq5Meas_Impl

Revision / Baseline:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. ES221A_HwTq5Meas_Impl_1.5.0

Change Owner:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Ramachandran(Tata Elxsi)

Work CR ID:

EA4#15015

kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:

Reviewed:

Yes

MDD

Yes

Source Code

Yes

PolySpace

N/A

Integration Manual

Yes

Davinci Files

Comments:

Reviewed changes alone

General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.

Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)

Quality Check Items:

Rationale is required for all answers of No

New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows

Yes

Comments:

naming convention

Project contains necessary subprojects

Yes

Comments:

Project contains the correct version of subprojects

Yes

Comments:

Design subproject is correct version

Yes

Comments:

General Notes / Comments:

LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:

Change Owner:

Ramachandran(Tata Elxsi)

Review Date :

10/30/17

Lead Peer Reviewer:

Krishna Anne

Approved by Reviewer(s):

Yes

Other Reviewer(s):

Sheet 3: Davinci Files

Rev 1.2

8-Jun-15

Peer Review Meeting Log (Davinci Review)

Quality Check Items:

Rationale is required for all answers of No

Only StdDef Port types are used

Yes

Comments:

For components not using application data types, do all

Yes

Comments:

port interface names end in PortIf and a sequence number

Non-program-specific components saved

Yes

Comments:

in Autosar 4.0.3 format

*Cfg.arxml.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator imported the

N/A

Comments:

change correctly

*Cfg.h.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator generates

N/A

Comments:

the configuration header(s) file correctly

kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify

All changed files have been compared against previous

Yes

Comments:

versions (If available)

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify if previous version was compared and only the expected change(s) was present. This is for text files only, not binary or GUIs Rationale: This is helpful in identifying unapproved (intended or mistaken) changes.

Automated validation check is performed

Yes

Comments:

Naming conventions followed. All names should

Yes

Comments:

match DataDict.m

Sender/Receiver port properties match DataDict.m

Yes

Comments:

file (use .m file helper tool)

Calibration port properties match DataDict.m

N/A

Comments:

file (use .m file helper tool)

Components using application data types:

Sender/Receiver port initialization values match

N/A

Comments:

DataDict.m file

Calibration port initialization values match

N/A

Comments:

DataDict.m file

Components not using application data types:

Sender/Receiver port initialization values match

Yes

Comments:

DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts

for fixed point types

Calibration port initialization values match

N/A

Comments:

DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts

for fixed point types

Mapping set and all unused items have been

Yes

Comments:

removed

All sender/receiver port read/writes using direct

Yes

Comments:

read/writes(List justification if not)

Runnable calling frequencies match FDD

N/A

Comments:

DataDict.m display variables: created as

N/A

Comments:

PerInstanceMemory. Matches the FDD

Component is correct component type

Yes

Comments:

General Notes / Comments:

Change Owner:

Ramachandran(Tata Elxsi)

Review Date :

10/30/17

Component Type :

CDD

Lead Peer Reviewer:

Krishna Anne

Approved by Reviewer(s):

Yes

Other Reviewer(s):

Sheet 4: Source Code

Rev 1.2

8-Jun-15

Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

Source File Name:

CDD_HwTq5Meas.c

Source File Revision:

Header File Name:

CDD_HwTq5Meas.h

Header File Revision:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this. 1

MDD Name:

HwTq5Meas_MDD

Revision:

FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:

ES221A_HwTq5Meas_Design

Revision:

1.10.0

Quality Check Items:

Rationale is required for all answers of No

Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:

for variable names

Yes

Comments:

for constant names

Yes

Comments:

for function names

N/A

Comments:

for other names (component, memory

N/A

Comments:

mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)

All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring

Yes

Comments:

all outputs are initialized prior to being written

Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD

N/A

Comments:

requirements tracability in the FDD

All variables are declared at the function level.

Yes

Comments:

Synergy version matches change history

kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.

Yes

Comments:

and Version Control version in file comment block

Change log contains detailed description of changes

Yes

Comments:

and Work CR number

Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)

Yes

Comments:

Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings

KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.

Yes

Comments:

Component.h is included

Yes

Comments:

All other includes are actually needed. (System includes

Yes

Comments:

only allowed in Nexteer library components)

Software Design and Coding Standards followed:

Version: 2.1

Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate

Yes

Comments:

and have been updated for the change: [N40] and

all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],

plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],

[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]

Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per

Yes

Comments:

standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]

Function comment blocks are per standards and

N/A

Comments:

contain correct information: [N43]

Code formatting (indentation, placement of

Yes

Comments:

braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],

[N57], [N58], [N59]

Embedded constants used per standards; no

N/A

Comments:

"magic numbers": [N12]

Memory mapping for non-RTE code

N/A

Comments:

is per standard

All execution-order-dependent code can be

Yes

Comments:

recognized by the compiler: [N80]

All loops have termination conditions that ensure

N/A

Comments:

finite loop iterations: [N63]

All divides protect against divide by zero

N/A

Comments:

if needed: [N65]

All integer division and modulus operations

N/A

Comments:

handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]

All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,

N/A

Comments:

including all use of fixed point macros and

timer functions, is correct and has no possibility

of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]

All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.

N/A

Comments:

float value is non-negative: [N67]

All conversions between signed and unsigned

N/A

Comments:

types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]

All pointer dereferencing protects against

N/A

Comments:

null pointer if needed: [N70]

Component outputs are limited to the legal range

N/A

Comments:

defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]

All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD

Yes

Comments:

subfunctions and/or model blocks identified

with code comments; all code corresponds to

some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]

Review did not identify violations of other

Yes

Comments:

coding standard rules

Anomaly or Design Work CR created

N/A

Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers

for any FDD corrections needed

General Notes / Comments:

Change Owner:

Ramachandran(Tata Elxsi)

Review Date :

10/30/17

Lead Peer Reviewer:

Krishna Anne

Approved by Reviewer(s):

Yes

Other Reviewer(s):

Sheet 5: MDD

Rev 1.2

8-Jun-15

Peer Review Meeting Log (MDD Review)

MDD Name:

HwTq4Meas_MDD.docx

MDD Revision:

Source File Name:

CDD_HwTq4Meas.c

Source File Revision:

Source File Name:

Source File Revision:

Source File Name:

Source File Revision:

Quality Check Items:

Rationale is required for all answers of No

Synergy version matches document

Yes

Comments:

Change log contains detailed description of changes

Yes

Comments:

Changes Highlighted (for Unit Tester)

Yes

Comments:

Diagrams have been included per MDD Guideline

Yes

Comments:

and reviewed

All Design Exceptions and Limitations are listed

N/A

Comments:

Design rationale given for all global

N/A

Comments:

data not communicated through RTE ports, per

Design and Coding Standards rules [N9] and [N10].

All implementation details that differ from the FDD are

N/A

Comments:

noted and explained in Design Rationale

All Unit Test Considerations have been described

N/A

Comments:

General Notes / Comments:

Change Owner:

Ramachandran(Tata Elxsi)

Review Date :

10/30/17

Lead Peer Reviewer:

Krishna Anne

Approved by Reviewer(s):

Yes

Other Reviewer(s):

Sheet 6: PolySpace

Rev 1.2

8-Jun-15

Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)

Source File Name:

CDD_HwTq5Meas.c

Source File Revision:

Source File Name:

Source File Revision:

Source File Name:

Source File Revision:

EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:

01.03.00

Poly Space version:

Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013b

Polyspace sub project version:

Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0 TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0

QAC version:

Windows User: eg 8.1.1-R NA

QAC sub project version:

Windows User: eg. TL_100A_1.1.0 NA

Quality Check Items:

Rationale is required for all answers of No

Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.

Yes

Comments:

function prototypes match the latest component version

100% Compliance to the EA4 Static Analysis

Yes

Comments:

Compliance Guideline

Are previously added justification and deviation

Yes

Comments:

comments still appropriate

Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved

Yes

Comments:

deviation tags

Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK

Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

Yes

Comments:

for all functions in the component per Design

and Coding Standards rule [N47]

General Notes / Comments:

Change Owner:

Ramachandran(Tata Elxsi)

Review Date :

10/30/17

Lead Peer Reviewer:

Krishna Anne

Approved by Reviewer(s):

Yes

Other Reviewer(s):