This is the multi-page printable view of this section. Click here to print.

Return to the regular view of this page.

Component Implementation

Component Implementation

Component Documentation

1 - CDD_NxtrTi_MDD

Module Design Document

For

CDD_NxtrTi

Aug 23, 2017

Prepared For:

Software Engineering

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Prepared By:

Shawn Penning,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA
Change History

DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
Initial VersionShawn Penning1.001-May-2017
Updated for error injectionAvinash James2.023-Aug-2017


Table of Contents1 Introduction 5

1.1 Purpose 5

1.2 Scope 5

2 CDD_NxtrTi & High-Level Description 6

3 Design details of software module 7

3.1 Graphical representation of CDD_NxtrTi 7

3.2 Data Flow Diagram 7

Component level DFD 7

Function level DFD 7

4 Constant Data Dictionary 8

4.1 Program (fixed) Constants 8

Embedded Constants 8

5 Software Component Implementation 9

5.1 Sub-Module Functions 9

5.1.1 Init: NxtrTiInit1 9

5.1.1.1 Design Rationale 9

5.1.1.2 Store Module Inputs to Local copies 9

5.1.1.3 (Processing of function)……… 9

5.1.1.4 Module Outputs 9

5.1.2 NxtrTiInit0 9

5.1.3 Per: NxtrTiPer1 9

5.1.3.1 Design Rationale 9

5.1.3.2 Store Module Inputs to Local copies 9

5.1.3.3 (Processing of function)……… 9

5.1.3.4 Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs 10

5.2 Server Runnables 10

5.2.1 GetRefTmr100MicroSec32bit 10

5.2.2 GetRefTmr1MicroSec32bit 10

5.2.3 GetTiSpan100MicroSec32bit 10

5.2.4 GetTiSpan1MicroSec32bit 10

5.3 Interrupt Functions 10

5.3.1 Interrupt Function Name 10

5.3.1.1 Design Rationale 11

5.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 11

5.4.1 Local Function #1 11

5.4.1.1 Design Rationale 11

5.4.1.2 Processing 11

5.5 GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions 11

5.5.1 GLOBAL Function #1 11

5.5.1.1 Design Rationale 11

5.5.1.2 processing 11

6 Known Limitations with Design 12

7 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 13

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 14

Appendix B Glossary 15

Appendix C References 16

Introduction

Purpose

Scope

The following definitions are used throughout this document:

  • Shall: indicates a mandatory requirement without exception in compliance.

  • Should: indicates a mandatory requirement; exceptions allowed only with documented justification.

  • May: indicates an optional action.

CDD_NxtrTi & High-Level Description

Nexteer Time Complex Driver

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

Design details of software module

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

Graphical representation of CDD_NxtrTi

Data Flow Diagram

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

Component level DFD

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

Function level DFD

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

Constant NameResolutionUnitsValue
TMRFLTTHD_CNT_U321Counts200U

Software Component Implementation

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

Sub-Module Functions

Init: NxtrTiInit1

Design Rationale

None

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

None

(Processing of function)………

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

Module Outputs

None

NxtrTiInit0

Design Rationale

To be called by the user during initialization. If timers are not required prior to starting the

* RTE, this function does not need to be called directly by a user.

(Processing of function)

Non-RTE version of Nexteer Time Initialization function. Calling this function will initialize and

* start the hardware timers used by this module if not already done.

Per: NxtrTiPer1

Design Rationale

None

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

None

(Processing of function)………

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

Server Runnables

GetRefTmr100MicroSec32bit

Design Rationale

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

(Processing of function)

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

GetRefTmr1MicroSec32bit

Design Rationale

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

(Processing of function)

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

GetTiSpan100MicroSec32bit

Design Rationale

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

(Processing of function)

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

GetTiSpan1MicroSec32bit

Design Rationale

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

(Processing of function)

Refer to FDD to be created under CR EA4#164

Interrupt Functions

None

Interrupt Function Name

None

Design Rationale

None

Module Internal (Local) Functions

Local Function #1

None

Function Name(Exact name used)TypeMinMax
Arguments Passed(if none, write None)<Refer MDD guidelines[1]><Refer MDD guidelines[1]><Refer MDD guidelines[1]>
(Insert more rows for additional passed arguments)
Return Value(if no value returned, write N/A)

Design Rationale

Processing

GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions

Refer to 5.1.2

GLOBAL Function #1

Function Name(Exact name used)TypeMinMax
Arguments Passed(if none, write None)<Refer MDD guidelines[1]><Refer MDD guidelines[1]><Refer MDD guidelines[1]>
(Insert more rows for additional passed arguments)
Return Value(if no value returned, write N/A)

Design Rationale

processing

Known Limitations with Design

None

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

None

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation or AcronymDescription

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

  • ISO 9000

  • ISO/IEC 12207

  • ISO/IEC 15504

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)

  • ISO/IEC 15288

  • ISO 26262

  • IEEE Standards

  • SWEBOK

  • PMBOK

  • Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

TermDefinitionSource
MDDModule Design Document
DFDData Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #TitleVersion
1AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mapping (Link:AUTOSAR_SWS_MemoryMapping.pdf)v1.3.0 R4.0 Rev 2
2MDD GuidelineEA4 01.00.00
3Software Naming Conventions.doc2.0
4Software Design and Coding Standards.doc2.1

2 - NxtrTi Integration Manual

Integration Manual

For

NxtrTi

VERSION:2

DATE: 08/24/2017

Prepared By:

Software Group,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial versionL. Wendling102/16/2015
2Updated build time config parameter for error injectionAvinash James208/24/2017

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 Non RTE NvM Blocks 10

7.4 RTE NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
NoneN/A

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

See section 6. Please note the server runnables listed can be used as needed in the integration project and can be called via the RTE or outside of the RTE as required.

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ModulesNotes
MCUDIAGCERRINJ

STD_ON for micro diag special build

STD_OFF for all other builds

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

None

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

ParameterNotesSWC
N/A

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
N/A

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
N/A

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

N/A

Required Global Data Outputs

N/A

Specific Include Path present

Yes

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
NxtrTiInit0Can be called prior to O/S start if timer usage is needed before the RTE initialization tasks executeInitialization
NxtrTiInit1RTE Init Task
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
NxtrTiPer1NoneRTE 2ms Task
GetRefTmr100MicroSec32bit_OperServer RunnableClient Call
GetRefTmr1MicroSec32bit_OperServer RunnableClient Call
GetTiSpan100MicroSec32bit_OperServer RunnableClient Call
GetTiSpan1MicroSec32bit_OperServer RunnableClient Call

.

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
CDD_NxtrTi_START_SEC_CODE

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM
<Memmap usuage info>

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

Non RTE NvM Blocks

Block Name
<NVM block used Non RTE functions >

Note : Size of the NVM block if configured in developer

RTE NvM Blocks

Block Name
<NVM block used in RTE functions >

Note : Size of the NVM block if configured in developer

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

<This section is for appendix>

3 - NxtrTiReview


Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Davinci Files
Source Code CDD_NxtrTi.c
MDD
PolySpace


Sheet 1: Summary Sheet
























Rev 1.28-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Synergy Project Name:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. AR102A_NxtrTi_Impl
Revision / Baseline:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. AR102A_NxtrTi_Impl_1.3.0

























Change Owner:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Avinash James
Work CR ID:


EA4#14482





























kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:















































































































































































kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:






















































Reviewed:































YesMDD


YesSource Code


YesPolySpace









































YesIntegration Manual


YesDavinci Files








































































Comments:






























































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.





















Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:



naming convention





































Project contains necessary subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Project contains the correct version of subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Design subproject is correct version








Yes
Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Avinash James


Review Date :

08/24/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shruthi R


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):







































































Sheet 3: Davinci Files






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Davinci Review)


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Only StdDef Port types are used








Yes
Comments:










































For components not using application data types, do all








Yes
Comments:



port interface names end in PortIf and a sequence number





























































Non-program-specific components saved








Yes
Comments:




in Autosar 4.0.3 format




































*Cfg.arxml.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator imported the








N/A
Comments:




change correctly




































*Cfg.h.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator generates








N/A
Comments:










the configuration header(s) file correctly
kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify



























kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify
















All changed files have been compared against previous








Yes
Comments:




versions (If available)

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify if previous version was compared and only the expected change(s) was present. This is for text files only, not binary or GUIs Rationale: This is helpful in identifying unapproved (intended or mistaken) changes.


































Automated validation check is performed








Yes
Comments:

























































Naming conventions followed. All names should








Yes
Comments:










match DataDict.m













































Sender/Receiver port properties match DataDict.m








N/A
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Calibration port properties match DataDict.m








N/A
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Components using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file














































Calibration port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file













































Components not using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Calibration port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Mapping set and all unused items have been







Yes
Comments:










removed













































All sender/receiver port read/writes using direct








N/A
Comments:










read/writes(List justification if not)













































Runnable calling frequencies match FDD








Yes
Comments:

































DataDict.m display variables: created as








N/A
Comments:









PerInstanceMemory. Matches the FDD





































Component is correct component type








Yes
Comments:











































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Avinash James
Review Date :

08/24/17
Component Type :


CDD



























Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shruthi R
Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes

































Other Reviewer(s):





































































Sheet 4: Source Code CDD_NxtrTi.c






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


CDD_NxtrTi.c

Source File Revision:


4
Header File Name:


CDD_NxtrTi.h

Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this. 1

























MDD Name:

CDD_NxtrTi_MDD.doc

Revision:
2

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




AR102A_NxtrTi_Design

Revision:
1.1.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







Yes
Comments:

















































for constant names







Yes
Comments:

















































for function names







N/A
Comments:

















































for other names (component, memory







Yes
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)




































All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








N/A
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD








N/A
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD





































All variables are declared at the function level.








N/A
Comments:
























Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:



and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








Yes
Comments:
























All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








Yes
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version: 2.1

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







N/A
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







N/A
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]





































Code formatting (indentation, placement of







N/A
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







N/A
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]





































Memory mapping for non-RTE code







N/A
Comments:










is per standard





































All execution-order-dependent code can be







N/A
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







N/A
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]





































All divides protect against divide by zero







N/A
Comments:










if needed: [N65]





































All integer division and modulus operations







N/A
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]





































All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







N/A
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and













timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







N/A
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]





































All conversions between signed and unsigned







N/A
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]





































All pointer dereferencing protects against







N/A
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







N/A
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]





































All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







N/A
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








N/A
Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:

















































































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Avinash James


Review Date :

08/24/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shruthi R
Approved by Reviewer(s):





Yes































Other Reviewer(s):





































































Sheet 5: MDD






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (MDD Review)


























MDD Name:

CDD_NxtrTi_MDD.docx
MDD Revision:

2


























Source File Name:


CDD_NxtrTi.cSource File Revision:


4

Source File Name:


CDD_NxtrTi_Init.cSource File Revision:


1

Source File Name:



Source File Revision:






























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Synergy version matches document








Yes
Comments:













































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:













































Changes Highlighted (for Unit Tester)








Yes
Comments:













































Diagrams have been included per MDD Guideline








Yes
Comments:











and reviewed






































All Design Exceptions and Limitations are listed








N/A
Comments:



















































Design rationale given for all global








N/A
Comments:











data not communicated through RTE ports, per














Design and Coding Standards rules [N9] and [N10].















































All implementation details that differ from the FDD are








N/A
Comments:











noted and explained in Design Rationale






































All Unit Test Considerations have been described








N/A
Comments:



















































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Avinash James


Review Date :

08/24/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shruthi R
Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes

































Other Reviewer(s):





































































Sheet 6: PolySpace






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)


























Source File Name:


CDD_NxtrTi.cSource File Revision:


4

Source File Name:


CDD_NxtrTi_Init.cSource File Revision:


1

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:







1.3.0







Poly Space version:


Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013B
Polyspace sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0


QAC version:


Windows User: eg 8.1.1-R

QAC sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL_100A_1.1.0



























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No



































Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and





kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.


Yes
Comments:




function prototypes match the latest component version







































100% Compliance to the EA4 Static AnalysisYes
Comments:





Compliance Guideline





























Are previously added justification and deviation








Yes
Comments:





comments still appropriate






































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved








Yes
Comments:





deviation tags






































Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK






Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

Yes
Comments:





for all functions in the component per Design














and Coding Standards rule [N47]

































































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Avinash James


Review Date :

08/24/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shruthi R
Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes

































Other Reviewer(s):