Rte Peer Review Checklists

Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project

Sheet 1: Summary Sheet























Rev 1.019-Apr-17
Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Synergy Project Name:



Windows User: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should match the component short name and the middle part of the Synergy project name Rte
Revision / Baseline:


Windows User: Intended Use: Identify the implementation baseline name intended to be used for the changed component when changes are approved. Rte_Vector_4.16.0.0_2


























Change Owner:



Windows User: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) being reviewed Rijvi Ahmed
Work CR ID:


Windows User: Intended Use: Identify the Implementation Work CR whose work is being reviewed (may be more than one) EA4#20936


























3rd party delivery package identifier:







Intended Use: This is a reference to the identifier of the 3rd party delivery package(s) that the component was extracted/created from. Rationale: This will allow easier tracing back to 3rd party deliveries. Vector MICROSAR SIP CBD1700369 D04 Rh850


























Windows User: Identifiy which type of 3rd party component this is so as to provide appropriate review checklist sheets Component Type:





























































































































Windows User: General section for summarizing review comments or review notes. Review Checklist Summary:


















































Comments:


Only updated the Settings_Rte.xml file



























































Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)





















































Quality Check Items:





































Rationale is required for all answers of No











New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:





naming convention for 3rd Party Software Components









































Project contains necessary subprojects








N/A
Comments:


















There are no subprojects




























Project contains the correct version of subprojects








N/A
Comments:


















There are no subprojects




























General Notes / Comments:

































































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:



























Change Owner:

Rijvi


Review Date :

03/14/18

































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Akilan


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes
































Other Reviewer(s):











































































Last modified October 12, 2025: Initial commit (af72ad2)