1 - BattVltgCorrln_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual

For

BattVltgCorrln

VERSION: 2.0

DATE: 27-Jun-2017

Prepared By:

Brionna Spencer,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial versionN. Saxton1.025-May-2016
2Listed missing memory section in 7.1 Mapping.B. Spencer2.027-Jun-2017

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 Non RTE NvM Blocks 10

7.4 RTE NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
1FDD – ES259B Battery or Switched Voltage CorrelationSee Synergy subproject version
2EA4 Software Naming Conventions01.01.00
3Software Design and Coding Standards2.1

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
None

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

None

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ModulesNotes
None

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

None

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

ParameterNotesSWC
None

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
None

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
None

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Refer to DataDict.m file in the FDD.

Required Global Data Outputs

Refer to DataDict.m file in the FDD.

Specific Include Path present

No

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
BattVltgCorrlnInit1NoneRTE (Init)
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
BattVltgCorrlnPer1NoneRTE (2ms)

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
BattVltgCorrln_START_SEC_CODE

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

None

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

None

2 - BattVltgCorrln_MDD

Module Design Document

For

BattVltgCorrln

27-Jun-2017

Prepared For:

Software Engineering

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Prepared By:

Brionna Spencer,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USAChange History

DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
Initial VersionN. Saxton1.07-Jun-2016
Updated the graphical representation, added design rationale for BattVltgCorrlnPer1, and updated the documentation for modified local functions (i.e. DetInstCorrln, DetIdptSig, and DetCorrlnSts).B. Spencer2.027-Jun-2017

Table of Contents

1 BattVltgCorrln & High-Level Description 4

2 Design details of software module 5

2.1 Graphical representation of BattVltgCorrln 5

2.2 Data Flow Diagram 6

2.2.1 Component level DFD 6

2.2.2 Function level DFD 6

3 Constant Data Dictionary 7

3.1 Program (fixed) Constants 7

3.1.1 Embedded Constants 7

4 Software Component Implementation 8

4.1.1 Sub-Module Functions 8

4.1.2 Interrupt Service Routines 8

4.1.3 Server Runnable Functions 8

4.1.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 8

4.1.5 Transition Functions 10

5 Known Limitations with Design 11

6 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 12

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 13

Appendix B Glossary 14

Appendix C References 15

BattVltgCorrln & High-Level Description

Refer FDD

Design details of software module

Graphical representation of BattVltgCorrln

Data Flow Diagram

Component level DFD

N/A

Function level DFD

N/A

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

Constant NameResolutionUnitsValue
BATTVLTGIDPTSIGMIN_CNT_U08NoneCnt0
BATTVLTGIDPTSIGMAX_CNT_U08NoneCnt2

* Refer FDD for other constant definition

Software Component Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

Initialization sub-module {_Init()}

BattVltgCorrlnInit1
Design Rationale

Refer to FDD

Store module inputs to local copies

Refer to FDD

(Processing of function)……

Refer to FDD

Store local copy of outputs into module outputs

Refer FDD

Periodic sub-module {_Per()}

BattVltgCorrlnPer1
Design Rationale

Refer to FDD

Note the BattAndSwdVltgPassed temporary variable in the FDD was renamed to BattVltgAndSwd1NotFailed because the ‘no result’ case is also considered in the logic.

Store module inputs to local copies

Refer to FDD

(Processing of function)……

Refer to FDD

Store local copy of outputs into module outputs

Refer FDD

Interrupt Service Routines

None

Server Runnable Functions

None

Module Internal (Local) Functions

Local Function #1

Function NameDetInstCorrlnTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBattVltg_Volt_T_f32float32040
BattVltgSwd1_Volt_T_f32float32040
DiagcStsIvtr1Inactv_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
*BattVltgAndSwd1Ok_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
*UseSwdVltg_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
*UseBattVltg_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
*Ntc0x03CQlfrSts_Cnt_T_enumSigQlfr1SIGQLFR_NORESSIGQLFR_FAILD
*Ntc0x044QlfrSts_Cnt_T_enumSigQlfr1SIGQLFR_NORESSIGQLFR_FAILD
Return ValueSwdVltgLimd_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE

Description

Refer “Determine Instantaneous Correlation” subsystem in FDD.

Local Function #2

Function NameDetIdptSigTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNtc0x03CQlfrSts_Cnt_T_enumSigQlfr1SIGQLFR_NORESSIGQLFR_FAILD
Ntc0x044QlfrSts_Cnt_T_enumSigQlfr1SIGQLFR_NORESSIGQLFR_FAILD
*BattVltgAndSwd1NotFailed_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueBattVltgCorrlnIdptSig_Cnt_T_u08uint802

Description

This function implements the “Determine Independent Signals” subsystem in the model.

Local Function #3

Function NameDetCorrlnStsTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBattVltgAndSwd1NotFailed_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
BattVltgAndSwd1Ok_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
UseSwdVltg_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
UseBattVltg_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
*DftBrdgVltgActv_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueBattSwdVltgCorrlnSts_Cnt_T_u08uint802
Description

This function implements the “Determine Correlation Status” subsystem in the model.

Local Function #4

Function NameBattVltgDiagTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBattVltg_Volt_T_f32float32040
InhbBattVltgDiagc_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Description

Implements “Battery Voltage Diagnostics” subsystem.

Local Function #5

Function NameRngChkTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedBattVltg_Volt_T_f32float32040
BattVltgSwdMax_Volt_T_f32float32040
Return ValueTestLgc_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Description

Implements “Range Check” block in the model. Created to reduce cyclomatic complexity and static path count.

Transition Functions

None

Known Limitations with Design

None

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

None

Abbreviations and Acronyms

None

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

  • ISO 9000

  • ISO/IEC 12207

  • ISO/IEC 15504

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)

  • ISO/IEC 15288

  • ISO 26262

  • IEEE Standards

  • SWEBOK

  • PMBOK

  • Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

TermDefinitionSource
MDDModule Design Document
DFDData Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #TitleVersion
1AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mappingv1.3.0 R4.0 Rev 2
2MDD GuidelineEA4 01.00.01
3EA4 Software Naming Conventions01.01.00
4Software Design and Coding Standards2.1
5FDD – ES259B Battery or Switched Voltage CorrelationSee Synergy subproject version

3 - BattVltgCorrln_PeerReview


Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Davinci Files
Source Code
PolySpace


Sheet 1: Summary Sheet
























Rev 1.28-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Synergy Project Name:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. ES259B_BattVltgCorrln_Impl
Revision / Baseline:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. ES259B_BattVltgCorrln_Impl_1.2.0

























Change Owner:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Matthew Leser
Work CR ID:


EA4#16065





























kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:















































































































































































kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:






















































Reviewed:































N/AMDD


YesSource Code


YesPolySpace









































N/AIntegration Manual


YesDavinci Files








































































Comments:






























































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.





















Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:



naming convention





































Project contains necessary subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Project contains the correct version of subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Design subproject is correct version








Yes
Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Matthew Leser


Review Date :

11/01/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Brendon Binder


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):






































































Sheet 3: Davinci Files






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Davinci Review)


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Only StdDef Port types are used









N/A
Comments:










































For components not using application data types, do all








N/A
Comments:



port interface names end in PortIf and a sequence number





























































Non-program-specific components saved








Yes
Comments:




in Autosar 4.0.3 format




































*Cfg.arxml.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator imported the








N/A
Comments:




change correctly




































*Cfg.h.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator generates








N/A
Comments:










the configuration header(s) file correctly
kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify



























kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify
















All changed files have been compared against previous








Yes
Comments:




versions (If available)

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify if previous version was compared and only the expected change(s) was present. This is for text files only, not binary or GUIs Rationale: This is helpful in identifying unapproved (intended or mistaken) changes.


































Automated validation check is performed








Yes
Comments:

























































Naming conventions followed. All names should








N/A
Comments:










match DataDict.m













































Sender/Receiver port properties match DataDict.m








N/A
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Calibration port properties match DataDict.m








N/A
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Components using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file





































Calibration port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file













































Components not using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







Yes
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Calibration port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Mapping set and all unused items have been







N/A
Comments:










removed













































All sender/receiver port read/writes using direct








N/A
Comments:










read/writes(List justification if not)













































Runnable calling frequencies match FDD








N/A
Comments:

































DataDict.m display variables: created as








N/A
Comments:









PerInstanceMemory. Matches the FDD





































Component is correct component type








Yes
Comments:











































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Matthew Leser
Review Date :

11/01/17
Component Type :


Application



























Lead Peer Reviewer:


Brendon Binder


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):






































































Sheet 4: Source Code






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


BattVltgCorrln.c

Source File Revision:


3
Header File Name:


N/A

Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this. N/A

























MDD Name:

BattVltgCorrln_MDD.doc

Revision:
3

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




ES259B_BattVltgCorrln_Design

Revision:
1.4.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







N/A
Comments:

















































for constant names







N/A
Comments:

















































for function names







N/A
Comments:

















































for other names (component, memory







N/A
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)




































All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








N/A
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the








N/A
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD





































All variables are declared at the function level.








N/A
Comments:
















































Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:



and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








N/A
Comments:
















































All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








N/A
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version: 2.1

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







N/A
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







N/A
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]




















































Code formatting (indentation, placement of







N/A
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







N/A
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]





































Memory mapping for non-RTE code







N/A
Comments:










is per standard





































All execution-order-dependent code can be







N/A
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







N/A
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]





































All divides protect against divide by zero







N/A
Comments:










if needed: [N65]





































All integer division and modulus operations







N/A
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]





































All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







N/A
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and













timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







N/A
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]





































All conversions between signed and unsigned







N/A
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]





































All pointer dereferencing protects against







N/A
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







N/A
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]





































All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







Yes
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








N/A
Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:

















































































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Matthew Leser


Review Date :

11/01/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Brendon Binder


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):






































































Sheet 5: PolySpace






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)


























Source File Name:


BattVltgCorrln.cSource File Revision:


3

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:





Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:







01.03.00







Poly Space version:


Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013b
Polyspace sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0



























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No



































Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and





kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.


Yes
Comments:




function prototypes match the latest component version







































100% Compliance to the EA4 Static AnalysisYes
Comments:





Compliance Guideline





























Are previously added justification and deviation








Yes
Comments:





comments still appropriate






































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved








Yes
Comments:





deviation tags






































Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK






Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

Yes
Comments:





for all functions in the component per Design














and Coding Standards rule [N47]

































































































General Notes / Comments:























Unreachable code warning with respect to Lim_u08 is okay; output limit is required by design and coding standards.


































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Matthew Leser


Review Date :

11/01/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Brendon Binder


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):