This is the multi-page printable view of this section. Click here to print.

Return to the regular view of this page.

Component Implementation

Component Implementation

Component Documentation

1 - CurrMeas_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual

For

CurrMeas

VERSION: 1.0

DATE: 18-May-2017

Prepared By:

Software Group,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial versionKrzysztof Byrski1.018-May-2017

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
1EA4 Software Naming Conventions01.01.00
2Software Design and Coding Standards2.1
3ES200B_CurrMeas_DesignSee Synergy Sub Project Version

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
DF001A_FltInjHeader file: FltInj.h
ES999A_ElecGlbPrmHeader file: ElecGlbPrm.h

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

CurrMeasPer2

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ModulesNotes
FLTINJENATakes values STD_ON or STD_OFF

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

None

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

ParameterNotesSWC
None

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
None

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
None

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

See FDD DataDict.m.

Required Global Data Outputs

See FDD DataDict.m.

Specific Include Path present

Yes

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
CurrMeasInit1NoneRTE(Init)
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
CurrMeasPer1NoneRTE(2ms)
CurrMeasPer2NoneISR(2 * MtrCtrlISR)
CurrMeasPer3NoneRTE(2ms)
CurrMeasEolGainReq_OperNoneRTE(Event)
CurrMeasEolGainStsReq_OperNoneRTE(Event)
CurrMeasEolOffsReq_OperNoneRTE(Event)
CurrMeasEolOffsStsReq_OperNoneRTE(Event)
CurrMeasGainReadReqSngIvtr_OperNoneRTE(Event)
CurrMeasGainWrReqSngIvtr_OperNoneRTE(Event)
CurrMeasOffsReadReqSngIvtr_OperNoneRTE(Event)
CurrMeasOffsWrReqSngIvtr_OperNoneRTE(Event)

.

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
CDD_CurrMeas_START_SEC_CODEFunctions
CDD_CurrMeas_MotCtrl_START_SEC_CODEFunctions

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM
None

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

*See DataDict.m

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

None

2 - CurrMeas_MDD

Module Design Document

For

CurrMeas

Oct 16, 2017

Prepared For:

Software Engineering

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Prepared By:

Software Group,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA
Change History

DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
Initial VersionKrzysztof Byrski1.019-May-2017
Fixed anomaly EA4#13330 by using required NVM blocks as applicableKrishna Anne2.016-Oct-17


Table of Contents

1 Introduction 5

1.1 Purpose 5

1.2 Scope 5

2 CurrMeas & High-Level Description 6

3 Design details of software module 7

3.1 Graphical representation of CurrMeas 7

3.2 Data Flow Diagram 7

3.2.1 Component level DFD 7

3.2.2 Function level DFD 7

4 Constant Data Dictionary 8

4.1 Program (fixed) Constants 8

4.1.1 Embedded Constants 8

5 Software Component Implementation 9

5.1 Sub-Module Functions 9

5.1.1 Init: CurrMeasInit1 9

5.1.2 Per: CurrMeasPer1 9

5.1.3 Per: CurrMeasPer2 9

5.1.4 Per: CurrMeasPer3 10

5.2 Server Runables 11

5.2.1 CurrMeasEolGainReq_Oper 11

5.2.2 CurrMeasEolGainStsReq_Oper 11

5.2.3 CurrMeasEolOffsReq_Oper 11

5.2.4 CurrMeasEolOffsStsReq_Oper 11

5.2.5 CurrMeasGainReadReqSngIvtr_Oper 11

5.2.6 CurrMeasGainWrReqSngIvtr_Oper 11

5.2.7 CurrMeasOffsReadReqSngIvtr_Oper 12

5.2.8 CurrMeasOffsWrReqSngIvtr_Oper 12

5.3 Interrupt Functions 13

5.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 13

5.4.1 OffsetCalibration 13

5.4.2 GainCalibration 14

5.4.3 RangeChkWIABC 14

5.4.4 ProtocolChkENABC 15

5.4.5 CalcMotCurrMotAgCorrd 15

5.4.6 CalMotCurrCorrdABC 15

5.4.7 OffsCalcABC 16

5.5 GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions 17

6 Known Limitations with Design 18

7 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 19

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 20

Appendix B Glossary 21

Appendix C References 22

Introduction

Purpose

Module Design Document for ES200B_CurrMeas.

Scope

The following definitions are used throughout this document:

  • Shall: indicates a mandatory requirement without exception in compliance.

  • Should: indicates a mandatory requirement; exceptions allowed only with documented justification.

  • May: indicates an optional action.

CurrMeas & High-Level Description

Refer FDD.

Design details of software module

Graphical representation of CurrMeas

Data Flow Diagram

Refer FDD

Component level DFD

None

Function level DFD

None

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

Constant NameResolutionUnitsValue
CALPROCNOTSTRTD_CNT_U081Cnt0
CALPROCSTRTD_CNT_U081Cnt1
CALPROCPASS_CNT_U081Cnt2
CALPROCPHAABCEOLOUTOFRNG_CNT_U081Cnt4
CALPROCVEHSPDCNDNOTMET_CNT_U081Cnt16
CALPROCMOTVELMRFCNDNOTMET_CNT_U081Cnt64
VEHSPDCDNNOTMET_CNT_U081Cnt4
MOTVELMRFCDNNOTMET_CNT_U081Cnt8
DIAGCSTSINVTRINACTV_CNT_U081Cnt16
FAILDATENA_CNT_U081Cnt2
FAILDATWRMININ_CNT_U081Cnt3
INVTRINACTV_CNT_U081Cnt8
DIFOFFSRNGCHKMAX_VOLT_F32Single precision floatVolt1.0
DEGREES30_MOTRAD_F32Single precision floatMotRad0.5236
MAXCURRCORRD_AMPR_F32Single precision floatAmpr200.0
PHAONTIBCOK_CNT_U081Cnt0x03
PHAONTIACOK_CNT_U081Cnt0x05
PHAONTIABOK_CNT_U081Cnt0x06
PHAONTIABCOK_CNT_U081Cnt0x07
PHAONTIA_CNT_U081Cnt0x04
PHAONTIB_CNT_U081Cnt0x02
PHAONTIC_CNT_U081Cnt0x01
NANOSECTOSEC_ULS_F32Single precision floatUls0.000000001

Software Component Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

Init: Init1

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Module Outputs

Refer FDD

Per: Per1

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

Refer FDD

Per: Per2

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

Refer FDD

Per: Per3

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

Refer FDD

Server Runables

CurrMeasEolGainReq_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

CurrMeasEolGainStsReq_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

CurrMeasEolOffsReq_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

CurrMeasEolOffsStsReq_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

CurrMeasGainReadReqSngIvtr_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

CurrMeasGainWrReqSngIvtr_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

CurrMeasOffsReadReqSngIvtr_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

CurrMeasOffsWrReqSngIvtr_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

Interrupt Functions

None

Module Internal (Local) Functions

OffsetCalibration

Function NameOffsetCalibrationTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedMotCurrAdcVlyA_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
MotCurrAdcVlyB_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
MotCurrAdcVlyC_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
MotVelMrf_MotRadPerSec_T_f32float32-1350.01350.0
VehSpd_Kph_T_f32float320.0511.0
VehSpdVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
BrdgVltg_Volt_T_f32float326.026.5
DiagcStsIvtr1Inactv_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueN/A---

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

GainCalibration

Function NameGainCalibrationTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedMotCurrEolOffsProcFlg_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
MotCurrAdcVlyA_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
MotCurrAdcVlyB_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
MotCurrAdcVlyC_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
MotVelMrf_MotRadPerSec_T_f32float32-1350.01350.0
MotCurrOffsZeroAvrgA_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
MotCurrOffsZeroAvrgB_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
MotCurrOffsZeroAvrgC_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
VehSpd_Kph_T_f32float320.0511.0
VehSpdVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
DiagcStsIvtr1Inactv_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
MotCurrEolCalStPrev_Cnt_T_enumMotCurrEolCalSt208
Return ValueN/A---

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

RangeChkWIABC

Function NameRangeChkWIABCTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedMotCurrAdcVlyA_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
MotCurrAdcVlyB_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
MotCurrAdcVlyC_Volt_T_f32float320.05.0
Return ValueInRng_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

ProtocolChkENABC

Function NameProtocolChkENABCTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedN/A---
Return ValueProtocolChkEn_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

CalcMotCurrMotAgCorrd

Function NameCalcMotCurrMotAgCorrdTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedN/A---
Return ValueMotCtrlCurrMeasMotAgCorrd_Rad_T_f32float32-0.76666.2832

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

CalMotCurrCorrdABC

Function NameCalMotCurrCorrdABCTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedMotCurrOffsA_Volt_T_f32float32-1892868,51892873,5
MotCurrOffsA_Volt_T_f32float32-1892868,51892873,5
MotCurrOffsA_Volt_T_f32float32-1892868,51892873,5
Return ValueN/A

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

OffsCalcABC

Function NameOffsCalcABCTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedN/A
Return ValueMotCurrOffsA_Volt_T_f32float32-1892868,51892873,5
MotCurrOffsB_Volt_T_f32float32-1892868,51892873,5
MotCurrOffsC_Volt_T_f32float32-1892868,51892873,5

Design Rationale

Refer FDD

Processing

Refer FDD

GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions

None

Known Limitations with Design

None

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

None

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation or AcronymDescription
--

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

  • ISO 9000

  • ISO/IEC 12207

  • ISO/IEC 15504

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)

  • ISO/IEC 15288

  • ISO 26262

  • IEEE Standards

  • SWEBOK

  • PMBOK

  • Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

TermDefinitionSource
MDDModule Design Document
DFDData Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #TitleVersion
1AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mapping (Link:AUTOSAR_SWS_MemoryMapping.pdf)v1.3.0 R4.0 Rev 2
2MDD GuidelineEA4 01.00.01
3Software Naming Conventions01.01.00
4Software Design and Coding Standards2.1
5ES200B_CurrMeas_DesignSee Synergy Sub Project Version

3 - CurrMeas_Review


Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Davinci Files
Source Code
CDD_CurrMeas_MotCtrl
MDD
PolySpace


Sheet 1: Summary Sheet
























Rev 1.28-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Synergy Project Name:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. ES200B_CurrMeas_Impl
Revision / Baseline:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. ES200B_CurrMeas_Impl_2.1.0

























Change Owner:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Krishna Anne
Work CR ID:


EA4#15188





























kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:















































































































































































kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:






















































Reviewed:































YesMDD


YesSource Code


YesPolySpace









































N/AIntegration Manual


YesDavinci Files








































































Comments:






























































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.





















Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:



naming convention





































Project contains necessary subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Project contains the correct version of subprojects








Yes
Comments:
















Latest versions
























Design subproject is correct version








Yes
Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

10/16/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shawn Penning


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 3: Davinci Files






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Davinci Review)


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Only StdDef Port types are used








Yes
Comments:










































For components not using application data types, do all








Yes
Comments:



port interface names end in PortIf and a sequence number





























































Non-program-specific components saved








Yes
Comments:




in Autosar 4.0.3 format




































*Cfg.arxml.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator imported the








N/A
Comments:




change correctly




































*Cfg.h.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator generates








N/A
Comments:










the configuration header(s) file correctly
kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify



























kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify
















All changed files have been compared against previous








Yes
Comments:




versions (If available)

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify if previous version was compared and only the expected change(s) was present. This is for text files only, not binary or GUIs Rationale: This is helpful in identifying unapproved (intended or mistaken) changes.


































Automated validation check is performed








Yes
Comments:

























































Naming conventions followed. All names should








Yes
Comments:










match DataDict.m













































Sender/Receiver port properties match DataDict.m








Yes
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Calibration port properties match DataDict.m








Yes
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Components using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file














































Calibration port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file













































Components not using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







Yes
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Calibration port initialization values match







Yes
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Mapping set and all unused items have been







Yes
Comments:










removed













































All sender/receiver port read/writes using direct








Yes
Comments:










read/writes(List justification if not)













































Runnable calling frequencies match FDD








N/A
Comments:

































DataDict.m display variables: created as








N/A
Comments:









PerInstanceMemory. Matches the FDD





































Component is correct component type








Yes
Comments:











































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne
Review Date :

10/16/17
Component Type :


CDD



























Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shawn Penning
Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes

































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 4: Source Code






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


CDD_CurrMeas.c

Source File Revision:


4
Header File Name:


CDD_CurrMeas.h

Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this. 1

























MDD Name:

CurrMeas_MDD.docx

Revision:
2

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




ES200B_CurrMeas_Design

Revision:
2.1.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







Yes
Comments:

















































for constant names







N/A
Comments:






















N/A for changes

























for function names







N/A
Comments:






















N/A for changes

























for other names (component, memory







N/A
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)










N/A for changes
























All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








Yes
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD








N/A
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD











N/A for EA4
























All variables are declared at the function level.








Yes
Comments:
























Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:



and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








Yes
Comments:
























All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








Yes
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version: 2.1

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







Yes
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







N/A
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]










N/A for changes

























Code formatting (indentation, placement of







Yes
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







N/A
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]










N/A for changes

























Memory mapping for non-RTE code







Yes
Comments:










is per standard





































All execution-order-dependent code can be







Yes
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







N/A
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]










N/A for changes

























All divides protect against divide by zero







N/A
Comments:










if needed: [N65]










N/A for changes

























All integer division and modulus operations







N/A
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]










N/A for changes

























All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







N/A
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and










N/A for changes

timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







N/A
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]










N/A for changes

























All conversions between signed and unsigned







N/A
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]










N/A for changes

























All pointer dereferencing protects against







Yes
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







N/A
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]










N/A for changes

























All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







Yes
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








N/A
Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:

















































































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

10/16/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shawn Penning


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 5: CDD_CurrMeas_MotCtrl






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


CDD_CurrMeas_MotCtrl.c

Source File Revision:


3
Header File Name:





Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this.

























MDD Name:

CurrMeas_MDD.docx

Revision:
2

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




ES200B_CurrMeas_Design

Revision:
2.1.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







N/A
Comments:






















N/A for changes

























for constant names







N/A
Comments:






















N/A for changes

























for function names







N/A
Comments:






















N/A for changes

























for other names (component, memory







N/A
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)










N/A for changes
























All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








Yes
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD








N/A
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD











N/A for EA4
























All variables are declared at the function level.








Yes
Comments:
























Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:



and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








N/A
Comments:
























All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








Yes
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version: 2.1

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







Yes
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







N/A
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







N/A
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]










N/A for changes

























Code formatting (indentation, placement of







Yes
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







N/A
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]










N/A for changes

























Memory mapping for non-RTE code







Yes
Comments:










is per standard





































All execution-order-dependent code can be







Yes
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







N/A
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]










N/A for changes

























All divides protect against divide by zero







N/A
Comments:










if needed: [N65]










N/A for changes

























All integer division and modulus operations







N/A
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]










N/A for changes

























All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







N/A
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and










N/A for changes

timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







N/A
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]










N/A for changes

























All conversions between signed and unsigned







N/A
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]










N/A for changes

























All pointer dereferencing protects against







Yes
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







N/A
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]










N/A for changes

























All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







Yes
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








N/A
Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:

















































































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

10/16/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shawn Penning


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 6: MDD






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (MDD Review)


























MDD Name:

CurrMeas_MDD







MDD Revision:

2


























Source File Name:


CDD_CurrMeas.c











Source File Revision:


4

Source File Name:


CDD_CurrMeas_MotCtrl.c











Source File Revision:


3

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Synergy version matches document








Yes
Comments:













































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:













































Changes Highlighted (for Unit Tester)








Yes
Comments:













































Diagrams have been included per MDD Guideline








Yes
Comments:











and reviewed






































All Design Exceptions and Limitations are listed








N/A
Comments:



















































Design rationale given for all global








Yes
Comments:











data not communicated through RTE ports, per














Design and Coding Standards rules [N9] and [N10].















































All implementation details that differ from the FDD are








N/A
Comments:











noted and explained in Design Rationale






































All Unit Test Considerations have been described








N/A
Comments:



















































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

10/16/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shawn Penning


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 7: PolySpace






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)


























Source File Name:


CDD_CurrMeas.cSource File Revision:


4

Source File Name:


CDD_CurrMeas_MotCtrl.cSource File Revision:


3

Source File Name:


-Source File Revision:


-


























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:







01.03.00







Poly Space version:


Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013b
Polyspace sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0 NA


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No



































Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and





kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.


Yes
Comments:




function prototypes match the latest component version











Not changed since previous version


























100% Compliance to the EA4 Static AnalysisYes
Comments:





Compliance Guideline





























Are previously added justification and deviation








Yes
Comments:





comments still appropriate






































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved








Yes
Comments:





deviation tags










Not changed since previous version


























Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK






Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

No
Comments:





for all functions in the component per Design










Not changed since previous version


and Coding Standards rule [N47]

































































































General Notes / Comments:























10/16/2017: Krishna : Cyclomatic complexity was beyond the acceptable limits since the beginning of this Impl; This needs to be fixed in a next update.


































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

10/16/17
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Shawn Penning


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):