This is the multi-page printable view of this section. Click here to print.

Return to the regular view of this page.

Component Implementation

1: HwTqCorrln_ Review
2: HwTqCorrln_IntegrationManual
3: HwTqCorrln_MDD

Component Implementation

Component Documentation

1 - HwTqCorrln_ Review

Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Source Code
PolySpace

Sheet 1: Summary Sheet

Rev 1.2

8-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet

Synergy Project Name:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. ES229C_HwTqCorrln_Impl

Revision / Baseline:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. 1.1.0

Change Owner:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Matthew Leser

Work CR ID:

EA4#11134

kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:

Reviewed:

N/A

MDD

Yes

Source Code

Yes

PolySpace

N/A

Integration Manual

N/A

Davinci Files

Comments:

General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.

Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)

Quality Check Items:

Rationale is required for all answers of No

New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows

Yes

Comments:

naming convention

Project contains necessary subprojects

Yes

Comments:

Project contains the correct version of subprojects

Yes

Comments:

Design subproject is correct version

Yes

Comments:

General Notes / Comments:

LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:

Change Owner:

Matthew Leser

Review Date :

04/18/17

Lead Peer Reviewer:

Krishna Anne

Approved by Reviewer(s):

Yes

Other Reviewer(s):

Sheet 3: Source Code

Rev 1.2

8-Jun-15

Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

Source File Name:

HwTqCorrln.c

Source File Revision:

Header File Name:

Header File Revision:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this.

MDD Name:

HwTqCorrln_MDD.docx

Revision:

FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:

ES229C_HwTqCorrln_Design

Revision:

1.0.0

Quality Check Items:

Rationale is required for all answers of No

Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:

for variable names

N/A

Comments:

for constant names

Yes

Comments:

for function names

N/A

Comments:

for other names (component, memory

N/A

Comments:

mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)

All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring

Yes

Comments:

all outputs are initialized prior to being written

Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD

N/A

Comments:

requirements tracability in the FDD

All variables are declared at the function level.

N/A

Comments:

Synergy version matches change history

kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.

Yes

Comments:

and Version Control version in file comment block

Change log contains detailed description of changes

Yes

Comments:

and Work CR number

Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)

Yes

Comments:

Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings

KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.

Yes

Comments:

Component.h is included

N/A

Comments:

All other includes are actually needed. (System includes

Yes

Comments:

only allowed in Nexteer library components)

Software Design and Coding Standards followed:

Version: 2.1

Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate

Yes

Comments:

and have been updated for the change: [N40] and

all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],

plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],

[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]

Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per

Yes

Comments:

standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]

Function comment blocks are per standards and

N/A

Comments:

contain correct information: [N43]

Code formatting (indentation, placement of

Yes

Comments:

braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],

[N57], [N58], [N59]

Embedded constants used per standards; no

Yes

Comments:

"magic numbers": [N12]

Memory mapping for non-RTE code

N/A

Comments:

is per standard

All execution-order-dependent code can be

N/A

Comments:

recognized by the compiler: [N80]

All loops have termination conditions that ensure

N/A

Comments:

finite loop iterations: [N63]

All divides protect against divide by zero

N/A

Comments:

if needed: [N65]

All integer division and modulus operations

N/A

Comments:

handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]

All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,

N/A

Comments:

including all use of fixed point macros and

timer functions, is correct and has no possibility

of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]

All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.

N/A

Comments:

float value is non-negative: [N67]

All conversions between signed and unsigned

N/A

Comments:

types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]

All pointer dereferencing protects against

N/A

Comments:

null pointer if needed: [N70]

Component outputs are limited to the legal range

Yes

Comments:

defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]

All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD

Yes

Comments:

subfunctions and/or model blocks identified

with code comments; all code corresponds to

some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]

Review did not identify violations of other

Yes

Comments:

coding standard rules

Anomaly or Design Work CR created

N/A

Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers

for any FDD corrections needed

General Notes / Comments:

Change Owner:

Matthew Leser

Review Date :

04/18/17

Lead Peer Reviewer:

Krishna Anne

Approved by Reviewer(s):

Yes

Other Reviewer(s):

Sheet 4: PolySpace

Rev 1.2

8-Jun-15

Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)

Source File Name:

HwTqCorrln.c

Source File Revision:

Source File Name:

Source File Revision:

Source File Name:

Source File Revision:

EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:

Draft 1.2

Poly Space version:

Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013b

Polyspace sub project version:

Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0 N/A

QAC version:

Windows User: eg 8.1.1-R 8.1.1-R

QAC sub project version:

Windows User: eg. TL_100A_1.1.0 N/A

Quality Check Items:

Rationale is required for all answers of No

Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.

Yes

Comments:

function prototypes match the latest component version

100% Compliance to the EA4 Static Analysis

Yes

Comments:

Compliance Guideline

Are previously added justification and deviation

Yes

Comments:

comments still appropriate

Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved

Yes

Comments:

deviation tags

Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK

Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

Yes

Comments:

for all functions in the component per Design

and Coding Standards rule [N47]

General Notes / Comments:

No QAC done on this component as this was done using new component process/script

Change Owner:

Matthew Leser

Review Date :

04/18/17

Lead Peer Reviewer:

Krishna Anne

Approved by Reviewer(s):

Yes

Other Reviewer(s):

2 - HwTqCorrln_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual

For

HwTqCorrln

VERSION: 1.0

DATE: 8-March-2017

Prepared By:

Matthew Leser,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.	Description	Author	Version	Date
1	Initial version	ML	1.0	08-March-2017

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 5

2 References 6

3 Dependencies 7

3.1 SWCs 7

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 7

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 8

4.1 Build Time Config 8

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 8

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 8

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 8

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 8

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 9

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 9

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 9

5.3 Specific Include Path present 9

6 Runnable Scheduling 10

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 11

7.1 Mapping 11

7.2 Usage 11

7.3 NvM Blocks 11

8 Compiler Settings 12

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 12

8.2 Optimization Settings 12

9 Appendix 13

Abbrevations And Acronyms

Abbreviation	Description
DFD	Design functional diagram
MDD	Module design Document
	<ADD more to the table if applicable>

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.	Title	Version
<1>	<MDD Guidelines>	Process 04.02.00
<2>	<Software Naming Conventions>	Process 04.02.00
<3>	<Coding standards>	Process 04.02.00
<4>	FDD – ES229C_HwTqCorrln_Design	See Synergy Subproject version

Dependencies

SWCs

Module	Required Feature
None

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

HwTqCorrlnPer1()

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

Modules	Notes
None

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

None

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

Parameter	Notes	SWC
None

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR Name	VIM #	Priority Dependency	Notes
None

Manual Configuration Changes

Constant	Notes	SWC
None

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Refer .m file

Required Global Data Outputs

Refer .m file

Specific Include Path present

Yes

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

Init	Scheduling Requirements	Trigger
HwTqCorrlnInit1	None	RTE Init

Runnable	Scheduling Requirements	Trigger
HwTqCorrlnPer1	None	2 ms

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory Section	Contents	Notes
None

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

Feature	RAM	ROM
None

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

None

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

None

3 - HwTqCorrln_MDD

Module Design Document

For

HwTqCorrln

March 8, 2017

Prepared For:

Software Engineering

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Prepared By:

Matthew Leser,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Change History

Description	Author	Version	Date
Initial Version	ML	1.0	08-March-2017

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 6

1.1 Purpose 6

1.2 Scope 6

2 HwTqCorrln & High-Level Description 7

3 Design details of software module 8

3.1 Graphical representation of HwTqCorrln 8

3.2 Data Flow Diagram 8

3.2.1 Component level DFD 8

3.2.2 Function level DFD 8

4 Constant Data Dictionary 9

4.1 Program (fixed) Constants 9

4.1.1 Embedded Constants 9

5 Software Component Implementation 10

5.1 Sub-Module Functions 10

5.1.1 Init: HwTqCorrlnInit1 10

5.1.1.1 Design Rationale 10

5.1.1.2 Module Outputs 10

5.1.2 Per: HwTqCorrlnPer1 10

5.1.2.1 Design Rationale 10

5.1.2.2 (Processing of function)……… 10

5.2 Server Runnable 10

5.3 Interrupt Functions 10

5.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 10

5.4.1 Local Function #1 10

5.4.1.1 Design Rationale 10

5.4.1.2 Processing 10

5.4.2 Local Function #2 11

5.4.2.1 Design Rationale 11

5.4.2.2 Processing 11

5.4.3 Local Function #3 11

5.4.3.1 Design Rationale 11

5.4.3.2 Processing 11

5.4.4 Local Function #4 11

5.4.4.1 Design Rationale 11

5.4.4.2 Processing 11

5.4.5 Local Function #5 12

5.4.5.1 Design Rationale 12

5.4.5.2 Processing 12

5.5 GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions 12

6 Known Limitations with Design 13

7 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 14

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 15

Appendix B Glossary 16

Appendix C References 17

Introduction

Purpose

Scope

HwTqCorrln & High-Level Description

Refer FDD.

Design details of software module

<The Data Flow Diagrams should be created in the absence of this representation with the FDD.>

Graphical representation of HwTqCorrln

Data Flow Diagram

Refer FDD

Component level DFD

Refer FDD

Function level DFD

Refer FDD

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

Constant Name	Resolution	Units	Value
BITSHIFTB_CNT_U08	1	CNT	1U
BITSHIFTC_CNT_U08	1	CNT	2U
BITSHIFTD_CNT_U08	1	CNT	3U
BITSHIFTAC_CNT_U08	1	CNT	1U
BITSHIFTAD_CNT_U08	1	CNT	2U
BITSHIFTBC_CNT_U08	1	CNT	3U
BITSHIFTBD_CNT_U08	1	CNT	4U
BITSHIFTCD_CNT_U08	1	CNT	5U
DHWTQCORRLNIMDTCORRLNSTSMINLMT_CNT_U08	1	CNT	0U
DHWTQCORRLNIMDTCORRLNSTSMAXLMT_CNT_U08	1	CNT	63U

Software Component Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

Init: HwTqCorrlnInit1

Design Rationale

Init1 function is created so that it will allow a RTE model to be created in the AUTOSAR tools which allows Per-Instance Memory and calibration definition needs. The initialization function is doing nothing

Module Outputs

None

Per: HwTqCorrlnPer1

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

Refer FDD

Server Runnable

None

Interrupt Functions

None

Module Internal (Local) Functions

Local Function #1

Function Name	HwTqSigAvl	Type	Min	Max
Arguments Passed	HwTqRollgCntr_Cnt_T_u08	uint8	0	255
	HwTqQlfr_Cnt_T_enum	SigQlfr1	SIGQLFR_NORES	SIGQLFR_FAILD
	*RollgCntrPrev_Cnt_T_u08	uint8	0	255
	*StallCntr_Cnt_T_u08	uint8	0	255
Return Value	SigAvl_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE

Design Rationale

None

Processing

None

Local Function #2

Function Name	HwTqCorrlnFunc	Type	Min	Max
Arguments Passed	Sig1HwNwtMtr_T_f32	float32	-10	10
	Sig2HwNwtMtr_T_f32	float32	-10	10
	*SigCorrln_Cnt_T_u08	uint8	0	1
Return Value	SigCorrln_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE

Design Rationale

None

Processing

None

Local Function #3

Function Name	LongTermCorrln	Type	Min	Max
Arguments Passed	HwTqCorrln_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE
	NtcNr_Cnt_T_enum	enum	NTCNR_0X070	NTCNR_0X07A
	NtcStInfo_Cnt_T_u08	uint8	0	63
Return Value	HwTqNotFaild_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE

Design Rationale

None

Processing

None

Local Function #4

Function Name	ANDFunc	Type	Min	Max
Arguments Passed	Inp1_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE
	Inp2_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE
	Inp3_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE
Return Value	Outp1_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE

Design Rationale

This function was added to reduce path count.

Processing

None

Local Function #5

Function Name	ORFunc	Type	Min	Max
Arguments Passed	Inp1_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE
	Inp2_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE
	Inp3_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE
Return Value	Outp1_Cnt_T_logl	boolean	FALSE	TRUE

Design Rationale

This function was added to reduce path count.

Processing

None

GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions

None

Known Limitations with Design

None

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

None

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation or Acronym	Description

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

ISO 9000
ISO/IEC 12207
ISO/IEC 15504
Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)
Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)
ISO/IEC 15288
ISO 26262
IEEE Standards
SWEBOK
PMBOK
Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

Term	Definition	Source
MDD	Module Design Document
DFD	Data Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #	Title	Version
1	AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mapping (Link:AUTOSAR_SWS_MemoryMapping.pdf)	v1.3.0 R4.0 Rev 2
2	MDD Guideline	EA4 01.00.00
3	Software Naming Conventions.doc	1.0
4	Software Design and Coding Standards.doc	2.1
5	FDD – ES229C_HwTqCorrln_Design	See Synergy Subproject verison