Component Implementation

• 1: EcmOutpAndDiagc_IntegrationManual
• 2: EcmOutpAndDiagc_MDD
• 3: EcmOutpAndDiagc_PeerReviewChecklist

1 - EcmOutpAndDiagc_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual

For

EcmOutpAndDiagc

VERSION: 2.0

DATE: 06-Feb-2018

Prepared By:

Shruthi Raghavan,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Dependencies

SWCs

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

EcmOutpAndDiagcInit1

EcmOutpAndDiagcInit3

CtrlErrOut_Oper

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

None

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

Manual Configuration Changes

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Refer FDD

Required Global Data Outputs

Refer FDD

Specific Include Path present

Yes

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

¹ : Using the Mcal Api (Mcu_EcmReleaseErrorOutPin) call creates a dependency on the Mcal. We assume that Mcal Api does not write to any static RAM – this assumption must be revalidated everytime that there is a change/update to the MCAL

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

None

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

None

2 - EcmOutpAndDiagc_MDD

Module Design Document

For

EcmOutpAndDiagc

Feb 07, 2018

Prepared By:

Shruthi Raghavan,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA
Change History

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 4

1.1 Purpose 4

2 EcmOutpAndDiagc & High-Level Description 5

3 Design details of software module 6

3.1 Graphical representation of EcmOutpAndDiagc 6

3.2 Data Flow Diagram 6

3.2.1 Component level DFD 6

3.2.2 Function level DFD 6

4 Constant Data Dictionary 7

4.1 Program (fixed) Constants 7

4.1.1 Embedded Constants 7

5 Software Component Implementation 8

5.1 Sub-Module Functions 8

5.1.1 Init: EcmOutpAndDiagcInit1 8

5.1.1.1 Design Rationale 8

5.1.2 Init: EcmOutpAndDiagcInit3 8

5.1.2.1 Design Rationale 8

5.1.3 Periodic 8

5.2 Server Runables 8

5.2.1 CtrlErrOut_Oper 8

5.2.1.1 Design Rationale 8

5.3 Interrupt Functions 8

5.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 8

5.4.1 Local Function #1 8

5.5 GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions 8

6 Known Limitations with Design 9

7 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 10

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 11

Appendix B Glossary 12

Appendix C References 13

Introduction

Purpose

Module Design Document for Implementation of EcmOutpAndDiagc design for P1Mc processor based projects.

EcmOutpAndDiagc & High-Level Description

Refer FDD.

Design details of software module

Graphical representation of EcmOutpAndDiagc

Data Flow Diagram

Component level DFD

Refer FDD

Function level DFD

Refer FDD

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

Software Component Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

Init: EcmOutpAndDiagcInit1

Design Rationale

None

Init: EcmOutpAndDiagcInit3

Design Rationale

None

Periodic

None

Server Runables

CtrlErrOut_Oper

Design Rationale

The TrigReg1 enumeration type is given the type qualifier of EcmOutpAndDiagc so it is not generated in the RTE headers. The header in the include folder contains the typedef for this enum because it is not expected to be needed outside the context of this component (or server runnable call).

Interrupt Functions

None

Module Internal (Local) Functions

Local Function #1

GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions

None

Known Limitations with Design

None.

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

Register file definitions are in the P1Xc/include folder of AR202A since this component is designed for P1X-c micro.

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

• ISO 9000

• ISO/IEC 12207

• ISO/IEC 15504

• Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)

• Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)

• ISO/IEC 15288

• ISO 26262

• IEEE Standards

• SWEBOK

• PMBOK

• Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

References

3 - EcmOutpAndDiagc_PeerReviewChecklist

Rev 2.00

29-Nov-17

Nexteer SWC Implementation Peer Review Summary Sheet

Component Short Name:

Windows User: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should match the component short name from the DataDict.m fileand the middle part of the Synergy project name, e.g. Assi for the SF001A_Assi_Impl Synergy project

EcmOutpAndDiagc

Revision / Baseline:

Windows User: Intended Use: Identify the implementation baseline name intended to be used for the changed component when changes are approved E.g. SF001A_Assi_Impl_1.2.0

CM104B_EcmOutpAndDiagc_Impl_1.3.0

Change Owner:

Windows User: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) being reviewed

Avinash James

Work CR ID:

Windows User: Intended Use: Identify the Implementation Work CR whose work is being reviewed (may be more than one)

EA4#21605

kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:

Check the file types that needed modification for the Work CR(s); macros for the check boxes will populate the appropriate checklist tabs for the review.

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:

Reviewed:

At start of review, all items below should be marked "No". At the end of the review, all items should be marked "Yes" or "N/A" where N/A indicates the reviewers have reviewed the existing (unchanged) item and confirmed no updates were needed for the Work CR(s).

N/A

MDD

N/A

Source Code

N/A

PolySpace

N/A

Integration Manual

N/A

Davinci Files

Comments:

This is a PSR version of the changes proposed in CM104B. The changes in the design are not yet done.

Hence the baseline does not include the design sub project. Due to timing constraints not following the formal

review process.Tested the PSR. Approved deviaition by Lonnie Newton

General Guidelines: - The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request. - New components should include SWC Owner and/or SWC Design author and Integrator and/or SW Lead as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files) - Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed. - To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file. - .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file. Each peer review shall start with a clean copy of the latest peer review checklist template. Before the peer review, the change owner shall: o Review the previous component peer review and copy any relevant comments to the new review sheet. o Review all checklist items and make all corrections needed, so that the component is ready for peer review. The expectation is that peer review should find very few issues, because the change owner has already used the checklist to ensure the component changes are complete and correct. o Fill in all file name and version information as needed on peer review checklist tabs (file names may be copied from the previous peer review where appropriate) o Fill in checklist answers (Yes/No/NA pulldowns) ONLY on those items which are NA for the current change. All other checklist items should be blank going into the review meeting. During the peer review meeting: o For each page of the review, first review the items already marked as N/A for this change, to confirm that reviewers agree with this assessment; change the checklist box to blank if it is found that the item does apply. o Then review the items with the checklist box blank. After reviewing each of these items, the checklist box will be marked as "Yes", or the checklist box will be marked as "No" with needed rework indicated or with rationale indicated. o If any items are marked "No" with rationale indicated, this must be approved by a software supervisor or the software manager; there is a line in the "Review Board" section of each tab to indicate who approved the "No" items on that tab.