1 - requirements

FDDIDSourceFunctionLine(s)StatusComment
.SwFileName.SwFuncName.SwLines.SwStatus.SwComment
ES105A26StHlthSigNormn.cEcuTFildMon890,892I
ES105A27StHlthSigNormn.cOutpAssiMon991,993I
ES105A48StHlthSigNormn.cEcuTFildMon905-995I
ES105A49StHlthSigNormn.cOutpAssiMon906-996I
ES105A46StHlthSigNormn.cEcuTFildMon811-815,822-827,834-839,845-850,856-861,865-884I
ES105A44StHlthSigNormn.cEcuTFildMon842,844-849I
ES105A45StHlthSigNormn.cEcuTFildMon855-860I
ES105A42StHlthSigNormn.cEcuTFildMon819,821-826I
ES105A43StHlthSigNormn.cEcuTFildMon831,833-838I
ES105A40StHlthSigNormn.cEcuTFildMon796-896I
ES105A41StHlthSigNormn.cEcuTFildMon808,810-814I
ES105A7StHlthSigNormn.cUpdRawSig_Oper756-772I
ES105A6StHlthSigNormn.cUpdRawSig_Oper755-771I
ES105A9StHlthSigNormn.cStHlthSigNormnInit1694-700I
ES105A8StHlthSigNormn.cUpdRawSig_Oper757-773I
ES105A39StHlthSigNormn.cUpdRawSig_Oper795-895I
ES105A15StHlthSigNormn.cOutpAssiMon919,920,921I
ES105A14StHlthSigNormn.cEcuTFildMon804I
ES105A54StHlthSigNormn.cOutpAssiMon966-985I
ES105A51StHlthSigNormn.cOutpAssiMon934-941I
ES105A50StHlthSigNormn.cOutpAssiMon923I
ES105A53StHlthSigNormn.cOutpAssiMon953-960I
ES105A52StHlthSigNormn.cOutpAssiMon943-951I

2 - StHlthSigNormn Review


Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Source Code
PolySpace


Sheet 1: Summary Sheet
























Rev 1.28-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Synergy Project Name:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. ES105A_StHlthSigNormn_Impl
Revision / Baseline:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. ES105A_StHlthSigNormn_Impl_3.1.0

























Change Owner:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Akilan Rathakrishnan
Work CR ID:


EA#7978





























kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:















































































































































































kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:






















































Reviewed:
































MDD


YesSource Code


YesPolySpace









































Integration Manual



Davinci Files








































































Comments:






























































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.





















Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:



naming convention





































Project contains necessary subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Project contains the correct version of subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Design subproject is correct version








Yes
Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Akilan Rathakrishnan


Review Date :

10/13/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Krishna Anne


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 3: Source Code






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


StHlthSigNormn.c

Source File Revision:


6
Header File Name:





Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this.

























MDD Name:

StHlthSigNormn_MDD.doc

Revision:
3

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




ES105A_StHlthSigNormn_Design

Revision:
3.2.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







Yes
Comments:

















































for constant names







Yes
Comments:

















































for function names







Yes
Comments:

















































for other names (component, memory







N/A
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)




































All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








Yes
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD








N/A
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD





































All variables are declared at the function level.








Yes
Comments:
























Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:









and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








N/A
Comments:
























All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








N/A
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version:

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







Yes
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







Yes
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]





































Code formatting (indentation, placement of







Yes
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







Yes
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]





































Memory mapping for non-RTE code







N/A
Comments:










is per standard





































All execution-order-dependent code can be







N/A
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







N/A
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]





































All divides protect against divide by zero







Yes
Comments:










if needed: [N65]





































All integer division and modulus operations







Yes
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]





































All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







Yes
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and













timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







Yes
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]





































All conversions between signed and unsigned







N/A
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]





































All pointer dereferencing protects against







N/A
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







Yes
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]





































All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







Yes
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








Yes
Comments:









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:

















































































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Akilan Rathakrishnan


Review Date :

10/13/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Krishna Anne


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 4: PolySpace






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)


























Source File Name:







StHlthSigNormn.c






Source File Revision:


6

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:





Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:








01.01.00













Poly Space version:


Windows User: eg. 2013b R2013b
Polyspace sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0 Not released

QAC version:


Windows User: eg 8.1.1-R 8.1.1-R
QAC sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL_100A_1.1.0 TL100A_QACSuprt_1.2.0


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No



































Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and





kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.


Yes
Comments:




function prototypes match the latest component version







































100% Compliance to the EA4 Static AnalysisYes
Comments:





Compliance Guideline





























Are previously added justification and deviation








Yes
Comments:





comments still appropriate






































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved








Yes
Comments:





deviation tags






































Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK






Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

Yes
Comments:





for all functions in the component per Design














and Coding Standards rule [N47]

































































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Akilan Rathakrishnan


Review Date :

10/13/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Krishna Anne


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):









































































3 - StHlthSigNormn_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual

For

SThlthSigNormn

VERSION: 1.0

DATE: 09-Feb-2016

Prepared By:

Software Group,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial versionAkilan Rathakrishnan1.009-Feb-2016

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 Non RTE NvM Blocks 10

7.4 RTE NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document
<ADD more to the table if applicable>

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
<1><FDD - <FDD ES105A_StHlthSigNormn_Design>Refer Synergy subproject version

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
NoneN/A

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

< Global function (except the ones that are defined in RTE modules) that is defined in this component but used by other function

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ModulesNotes
None

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

None

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

ParameterNotesSWC
N/A

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
N/A

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
N/A

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Refer ES105A_StHlthSigNormn_DataDict.m file

Required Global Data Outputs

Refer ES105A_StHlthSigNormn_DataDict.m file

Specific Include Path present

No

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
StHlthSigNormnInit1NoneRTE Init
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
UpdRawSig_OperShall be triggered at the end of every tasks from which signals are monitored.Server invocation for OperationPrototype <Oper> of PortPrototype <UpdRawSig>

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
None

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM
None

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

Non RTE NvM Blocks

Block Name
None

Note : Size of the NVM block if configured in developer

RTE NvM Blocks

Block Name
None

Note : Size of the NVM block if configured in developer

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

<This section is for appendix>

4 - StHlthSigNormn_MDD

Module Design Document

For

State of Health Signal Normalization

Sep 27, 2016

Prepared For:

Software Engineering

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Prepared By:

Software Group,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USAChange History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial VersionAkilan Rathakrishnan1.009-Feb-2016
2Updated for EA4# 5445Akilan Rathakrishnan2.002-May-2016
3Updated for EA4#7305Akilan Rathakrishnan3.027-Sep-2016

Table of Contents

1 StHlthSignNormn High-Level Description 5

2 Design details of software module 6

2.1.1.1 Graphical representation of StHlthSigNormn 6

2.1.1.2 Data Flow Diagram 7

2.1.2 Component level DFD 8

2.1.3 Function level DFD 8

3 Constant Data Dictionary 9

3.1.1.1 Program (fixed) Constants 9

3.1.2 Embedded Constants 9

4 Software Component Implementation 10

4.1.1 Sub-Module Functions 10

4.1.1.1 Init: StHlthSigNormnInit1 10

4.1.1.2 Per: None 10

4.1.2 Interrupt Service Routines 10

4.1.3 Server Runnable Functions 10

4.1.3.1 UpdRawSig 10

4.1.3.1.1 Design Rationale 10

4.1.3.1.2 Store Module Inputs to Local copies 10

4.1.3.1.3 (Processing of function)……… 10

4.1.3.1.4 Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs 10

4.1.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 11

4.1.4.1 Local Function #1 11

4.1.4.1.1 Description 11

4.1.4.2 Local Function #2 Rationale 11

4.1.4.2.1 Description 11

4.1.4.3 Local Function #3 Rationale 11

4.1.4.3.1 Description 11

4.1.4.4 Local Function #4 Rationale 12

4.1.4.4.1 Description 12

4.1.4.5 Local Function #5 Rationale 12

4.1.4.5.1 Description 12

4.1.4.6 Local Function #6 Rationale 12

4.1.4.6.1 Description 12

4.1.4.7 Local Function #7 Rationale 12

4.1.4.7.1 Description 13

4.1.4.8 Local Function #8 Rationale 13

4.1.4.8.1 Description 13

4.1.4.9 Local Function #9 Rationale 13

4.1.4.9.1 Description 13

4.1.4.10 Local Function #10 Rationale 13

4.1.4.10.1 Description 13

4.1.4.11 Local Function #11 Rationale 14

4.1.4.11.1 Description 14

4.1.4.12 Local Function #12 Rationale 14

4.1.4.12.1 Description 14

4.1.4.13 Local Function #13 Rationale 14

4.1.4.13.1 Description 14

4.1.5 Transition Functions 14

5 Known Limitations with Design 15

6 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 16

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 17

Appendix B Glossary 18

Appendix C References 19

StHlthSignNormn High-Level Description

This component acts as an interface component between ES106A (State of Health Signal Statistics) and rest of the components from which signals need to be monitored. It reads data or status values from different components, applies normalization algorithm to convert it as State of Health information which will be in the scale of 0 to 100. It also provides auxiliary output for some signals to indicate the additional information about monitored signals.

Design details of software module

See FDD.

Graphical representation of StHlthSigNormn

Data Flow Diagram

See FDD.

Component level DFD

See FDD.

Function level DFD

See FDD.

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

Constant NameResolutionUnitsValue
TMAXRNGVAL_CNT_U081Cnt15
VLTGMAXRNGVAL_CNT_U081Cnt15
PHAVLTGDIVBYZEROPROTNVAL_NANOSEC_U321NanoSec180000

* Also see FDD ES105A_StHlthSigNormn_DataDict.m file

Software Component Implementation

<The detailed design of the function is provided in the FDD. The detail design shall only be added to the MDD when it is not provided in the FDD or the FDD is not adequate and clarification is needed.>

Sub-Module Functions

Init: StHlthSigNormnInit1

Design Rationale

None

Module Outputs

See FDD

Module Internal

See FDD

Per: None

Interrupt Service Routines

None

Server Runnable Functions

UpdRawSig

Design Rationale

None

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

See FDD

(Processing of function)………

See FDD

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

See FDD

Module Internal (Local) Functions

Local Function #1

Function NameEcuTFildMonTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNoneN/AN/AN/A
Return ValueCtrlrTStHlthUint80100
Return ValueCtrlrTRngUint8015

Description

This function implements “Controller Temperature” block in the FDD

Local Function #2 Rationale

Function NameOutpAssiMonTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNoneN/AN/AN/A
Return ValueOutpAssiStHlthUint80100
Return ValueVltgRngUint8015

Description

This function implements “Health of Assist Due To Voltage” block in the FDD

Local Function #3 Rationale

Function NameDigTqSnsrStHlthCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedSigId_ArgStHlthMonSig2020
Return ValueDigTqSnsrAStHlthUint80100
Return ValueDigTqSnsrBStHlthUint80100
Return ValueDigTqIdptSigStHlthUint80100

Description

This function implements “Digital Torque Sensor” block in the FDD

Local Function #4 Rationale

Function NameDutyCycExcddStHlthCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNoneN/AN/AN/A
Return ValueDutyCycStHlthUint80100

Description

This function implements “Duty Cycle” block in the FDD

Local Function #5 Rationale

Function NameEotImpctCntrStHlthCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNoneN/AN/AN/A
Return ValueEotImpctStHlthUint80100

Description

This function implements “EOT Impact” block in the FDD

Local Function #6 Rationale

Function NameMotPosnStHlthCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNoneN/AN/AN/A
Return ValueMotPosStHlthUint80100

Description

This function implements “Motor Position” block in the FDD

Local Function #7 Rationale

Function NameMotPosnErrStHlthCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedSigId_ArgStHlthMonSig2020
Return ValueAbsltMotPosABDifStHlthUint80100
Return ValueAbsltMotPosACDifStHlthUint80100
Return ValueAbsltMotPosBCDifStHlthUint80100

Description

This function implements “Motor Position Phase Difference” block in the FDD

Local Function #8 Rationale

Function NameCurrMotSumStHlthCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedSigId_ArgStHlthMonSig2020
Return ValueCurrMotSumABCStHlthUint80100
Return ValueCurrMotSumDEFStHlthUint80100

Description

This function implements “Current Motor Sum” block in the FDD

Local Function #9 Rationale

Function NamePhaVltgStHlthCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedSigId_ArgStHlthMonSig2020
Return ValuePhaAStHlthUint80100
Return ValuePhaBStHlthUint80100
Return ValuePhaCStHlthUint80100
Return ValuePhaDStHlthUint80100
Return ValuePhaEStHlthUint80100
Return ValuePhaFStHlthUint80100

Description

This function implements “Health of Phase” block in the FDD

Local Function #10 Rationale

Function NameRamEccSngBitCorrnStHlthCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNoneN/AN/AN/A
Return ValueRamEccSngBitCorrnStHlthUint80100

Description

This function implements “Single Bit Correction” block in the FDD

Local Function #11 Rationale

Function NamePhaVltgCalcStHlthTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedMotDrvErrX_NanoSec_T_f32float320,040000000,0
Return ValuePhaXStHlth_Cnt_T_u08Uint80100

Description

This function implements a sub-section in“Health of Phase”” block in the FDD

Local Function #12 Rationale

Function NameFricEstimnStHlthCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNoneNA
Return ValueNoneNA

Description

This function implements a sub-section in“Friction Estimation”” block in the FDD

Local Function #13 Rationale

Function NameWhlImbRejctnStHlthCalcTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNoneNA
Return ValueNoneNA

Description

This function implements a sub-section in“Wheel Imbalance Rejection”” block in the FDD

Transition Functions

None.

Known Limitations with Design

None

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

None

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation or AcronymDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document
FDDFunctional Design Document

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

  • ISO 9000

  • ISO/IEC 12207

  • ISO/IEC 15504

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)

  • ISO/IEC 15288

  • ISO 26262

  • IEEE Standards

  • SWEBOK

  • PMBOK

  • Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

TermDefinitionSource
MDDModule Design Document
DFDData Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #TitleVersion
1AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mapping (Link:AUTOSAR_SWS_MemoryMapping.pdf)v1.3.0 R4.0 Rev 2
2MDD GuidelineProcess Release 04.02.01
3Software Naming Conventions.docProcess Release 04.02.01
4Software Design and Coding Standards.docProcess Release 04.02.01
5FDD: ES105A_StHlthSigNormn_DesignSee Synergy subproject version