1 - ES400A_TunSelnMngt_Integration_Manual

Integration Manual

For

ES400A TunSelnMngt

VERSION: 4.0

DATE: 29-Aug-2016

Prepared By:

Kevin Smith

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDateApproved By
1Initial versionK. Smith1.009-Oct-15-
2Updated for version 1 of the designK. Smith2.004-Apr-16
3Removed CalUsgProtn exclusive areaN. Saxton3.006-May-16
4Anomaly correction for EA4#6672K. Smith4.029-Aug-16

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
1MDD GuidelinesProcess 04.02.00
2Software Naming ConventionsProcess 04.02.00
3Coding standardsProcess 04.02.00
4ES400A_TunSelnMngt_DesignSee Synergy subproject version

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
None

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

None

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ModulesNotes
None

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

  1. TunSelnMngt_Cfg_private.h – Genereated by Configurator

  2. TunSelnMngt_Cfg_private.c – Genereated by Configurator

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

All the parameters are generated by the data dictionary tool based on the configuration for the project

ParameterNotesSWC

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
None

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
None

Exclusive Areas

ConstantNotesSWC
TunSelnMngtIntDataProtnExclsvAreaExclusive area needs to protect periodic access of PIMs from asynchronous updates by server runnables SetCalPageReq and CopyCalPage. Integrator verify if client calls to server runnables are interrupt or task based and set up exclusive area to properly protect access.

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Required Global Data Outputs

Specific Include Path present

Yes. TunSelnMngt.h must also be included in Rte_UserTypes.h for non-RTE generated type definitions.

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
TunSelnMngtInit1This init function should be performed before any calibration access is done by another component and after DiagcMgr has initialized. However, if the calibration access is only to common calibrations, then there would be no impact.RTE
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
TunSelnMngtPer1NoneRTE 10ms

.

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
None

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM
None

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

*See DataDict.m

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

Recommend GENy settings for CANembedded Projects

The following settings are recommend for online calibration support and DAQ access. This only applies to projects that XCP settings are generated by GENy.

Configurable OptionsSettingRationale
Enable CalibrationTrueRequired to be true to enable write commands such as DOWNLOAD.
XCP ControlTrueRequired to enable or disable XCP access
Open Command InterfaceTrueRequired for XCP service E8 and E9 support
PrescalerTrueRequired to support scaling the DAQ timing (example, 2ms DAQ can be scaled in mulitples of 2ms to create DAQs running at 4ms, 8ms, 10ms, etc).
User Defined CommandsTrueRequired for additional functions built into XCP commands
Page SwitchingTrueRequired for online calibration functions to properly operate.
General Page InfoTrue
Copy PageTrue

2 - ES400A_TunSelnMngt_MDD

Module Design Document

For

TunSelnMngt

August 29, 2016

Prepared For:

Software Engineering

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Prepared By:

Kevin Smith,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA
Change History

DescriptionAuthorVersionDateApproved By
Initial VersionK. Smith107-Apr-16
Updated program flow diagramsN. Saxton206-May-16
Updates to flow charts for anomaly EA4#6672 correctionsK. Smith329-Aug-16


Table of Contents

1 Introduction 5

1.1 Purpose 5

1.2 Scope 5

2 TunSelnMngt & High-Level Description 6

3 Design details of software module 7

3.1 Graphical representation of TunSelnMngt 7

3.2 Data Flow Diagram 7

3.2.1 Component level DFD 7

3.2.2 Function level DFD 7

4 Constant Data Dictionary 8

4.1 Program (fixed) Constants 8

4.1.1 Embedded Constants 8

4.2 Variable Data Dictionary 8

4.2.1 User Defined Typedef Definition/Declaration 8

4.2.1.1 Static Structures 8

4.2.1.2 Dynamic Structures and Enums 9

4.2.2 User Defined Enumerated Types 10

5 Software Component Implementation 11

5.1 Sub-Module Functions 11

5.1.1 Init: TunSelnMngtInit1 11

5.1.2 Per: TunSelnMngtPer1 13

5.2 Server Runnables 15

5.2.1 CopyCalPageReq 15

5.2.2 GetCalPageReq 16

5.2.3 GetSegInfoReq 17

5.2.4 OnlineTunRamAdrMpg 18

5.2.5 SetCalPageReq 19

5.3 Interrupt Functions 20

5.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 20

5.4.1 SwtCalIdx 20

5.4.2 IdxChgMngt 21

5.4.3 MemCopy32Bit 23

5.4.4 MemCopy8Bit 24

5.4.5 SegModAdrInfo 25

5.4.6 SegModStdInfo 26

5.4.7 SegModAdrMpg 27

5.5 GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions 28

6 Known Limitations with Design 29

7 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 30

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 31

Appendix B Glossary 32

Appendix C References 33

Introduction

Purpose

This MDD aids in documenting the implementation of ES400A Tuning Selection Management.

Scope

The following definitions are used throughout this document:

  • Shall: indicates a mandatory requirement without exception in compliance.

  • Should: indicates a mandatory requirement; exceptions allowed only with documented justification.

  • May: indicates an optional action.

TunSelnMngt & High-Level Description

Tuning Selection Management (TunSelnMngt) provides the ability to change run-time calibrations during operation. The component also provides a RAM buffer for online calibration changes over XCP for tuning processes.

Design details of software module

Graphical representation of TunSelnMngt

Data Flow Diagram

None

Component level DFD

None

Function level DFD

None

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

Values between the brackets [] are the ranges that the configurable constants could be defined as for a given integration. These values are generated by Configurator before the software build.

Constant NameResolutionUnitsValue
MAXINITIDXCNT_CNT_U08Uint8Cnt[0-255]
MAXRTIDXCNT_CNT_U08Uint8Cnt[0-255]
MAXONLINECALCFGCNT_CNT_U08Uint8Cnt[0-255]
ONLINECALGROUPS_CNT_U08Uint8Cnt[0-255]
ONLINECALRAMTBL_CNT_U16Uint16Cnt[0-65535]
PRMPTRTBLSIZEINWORD_CNT_U16Uint16Cnt[0-65535]

Variable Data Dictionary

The following type definitions are found in the private header of this component.

User Defined Typedef Definition/Declaration

Static Structures

The following table contains structures are static in their definition. However, internal elements may change based on the configuration of the project but the high level content is the same. These elements are described at the bottom of the table.

Typedef NameElement NameUser Defined Type

Legal Range

(min)

Legal Range

(max)

TunSelnRamTblRec1PrmRefTblPtrRte_ParameterRefTabTypeN/AN/A
PrmTblCrc_u32Uint3204294967295
TunSelnIdxTblRec1SrcIdx_u16Uint16065535
DestIdx_u16Uint16065535
SigIdx_u08Uint80255
TunSelnOnlineCalIdxTblRec1RamStructPtr_u08UInt8*0255
StructSize_u16Uint16065535
TblIdx_u16Uint16065535
GroupIdx_u08Uint80255

Rte_ParameterRefTabType is a structure of void pointers that point to the various calibration component structures. This type is generated by the RTE based on the configuration of the integration.

Dynamic Structures and Enums

The following table contains structures are dynamic in their definition. The contents contained will vary from project to project. The intent of this table is to document their purpose.

Entry TypeTypedef NameExample Element(s)Variable TypeValueComment
EnumOnlineCalGroup1GroupAN/A0This enum contains a number representation for each calibration group that is generated for online calibration from A=0 to Z=26. Groups are defined by a letter suffix.
GroupBN/A1
Struct

<GroupName>Typ

GroupATyp

<Cal Region><Cal Cmp Name><Online Group>

CalRegn01CmnGroupA

RTE GeneratedN/AThis structure is generated based on the online groups configured. Each group will generate a structure and contain all calibration software components within that group.
UnionOnlineCalTblRec1Byte[<RAM Size>]Unit8N/AThis structure combines all the online calibration groups into data type for assignment to the RAM buffer. The ‘byte’ element is used to access the entire buffer on a byte-by-byte basis and ensure that the RAM is properly sized.
<GroupName><GroupName>TypN/A

User Defined Enumerated Types

Enum NameElement NameValue
GetSegModeSegInfo1GETSEGMODSEGINFO_ADR0
GETSEGMODSEGINFO_LEN1
GetSegModeMpgIdx1GETSEGMODMPGIDX_SRCADR0
GETSEGMODMPGIDX_DESTADR1
GETSEGMODMPGIDX_LEN2

Software Component Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

Init: Init1

Design Rationale

The initialization function creates two copies of the RTE generated flash table in to RAM. A CRC is performed on each of the copies to ensure that they match. The function also adjusts the tables to load the appropriate initialization and run-time calibrations indexes that are required by the application.

Processing

Module Outputs

None

Per: Per1

Design Rationale

Processing

Module Outputs

None

Server Runnables

CopyCalPageReq

Design Rationale

This function is called by the XCP master and queues the copy of the calibrations contained in the selected group, or segment, into the RAM buffer. The actual copy is performed by TunSelnMngt’s main periodic function, but this runnable logs the current state of TunSelnMngt and marks the copy in progress.

(Processing of function)………

Module Outputs

None

GetCalPageReq

Design Rationale

This function is called by the XCP master and returns the page with the request XCP and ECU access for a given segment.

(Processing of function)………

Module Outputs

None

GetSegInfoReq

Design Rationale

This function is called by the XCP master and returns the requested information for the provided segment.

(Processing of function)………

Module Outputs

None

OnlineTunRamAdrMpg

Design Rationale

This function is called by the XCP master. During tuning, tools such as eTool and CANape will read calibration values from their flash addresses because that is how the A2L file is defined. However, when the calibrations are access from RAM, the user does not always know the exact address the calibration is located. This function calculates the RAM address for a given calibration to the XCP function for reading and writing.

(Processing of function)………

Module Outputs

None

SetCalPageReq

Design Rationale

This function is called by the XCP master. This function will set the status of the calibration page for a given segment.

(Processing of function)………

Module Outputs

None

Interrupt Functions

None

Module Internal (Local) Functions

SwtCalIdx

Function NameSwtCalIdxTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedN/A
Return ValueN/A

Design Rationale

This function manages the RAM buffer access and switches the calibration index between the two copies in RAM.

Processing

IdxChgMngt

Function NameIdxChgMngtTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedSeldIdx_Cnt_T_u08Uint80255
GendCalTblSize_Cnt_T_u08Uint80255
GendCalTbl_T_recTunSelnIdxTblRec1*04294967295
Return ValueIdxFound_Cnt_T_loglBooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

Processing

MemCopy32Bit

Function NameMemCopy32BitTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedDes_ArgVoid04294967295
Src_ArgVoid04294967295
Len_ArgUint16065535
Return ValueN/A

Design Rationale

The 32-bit mem copy function is used to move calibration pointers from flash to RAM. The void pointers are internally assigned to a uint32 pointer before the processing loop begins.

Processing

MemCopy8Bit

Function NameMemCopy8BitTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedDes_ArgVoid04294967295
Src_ArgVoid04294967295
Len_ArgUint16065535
Return ValueN/A

Design Rationale

The 8-bit mem copy function is used to move calibration segments into the RAM space. Since the length of the segments is not guaranteed to be a 32-bit even address, 8-bit was selected to ensure that only the bytes required to be moved are performed. The void pointers are internally assigned to a uint8 pointer before the processing loop begins.

Processing

SegModAdrInfo

Function NameSegModAdrInfoTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedSeg_ArgUInt80255
SegInfo_ArgGetSegModSegInfo101
Resp_ArgUint8*0255
RespLen_ArgUint8*88
Return ValueRtn_Cnt_T_u08Uint80255

Design Rationale

Processing

SegModStdInfo

Function NameSegModStdInfoTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedSeg_ArgUint80255
Resp_ArgUint8*0255
RespLen_ArgUInt8*66
Return Value<Hard Coded>UInt811

Design Rationale

Processing

SegModAdrMpg

Function NameSegModAdrMpgTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedSeg_ArgUint80255
MpgIdxInfo_ArgGetSegModMpgIdx102
MpgIdx_ArgUint80255
Resp_ArgUInt8*04294967295
RespLen_ArgUint8*88
Return ValueRtn_Cnt_T_u08Uint80255

Design Rationale

Processing

TunSelnMngt_ChkXcpWrAcs

Function NameTunSelnMngt_ChkXcpWrAcsTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedReqAdr_Cnt_T_u32Uint3204294967296
Return ValueRtn_Cnt_T_loglBooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

This function is generated based on the configured access regions in Configurator. Below is just a high level overview of the function. The conditions in the if statements are logically OR’d together to form the tests.

Processing


GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions

None

Known Limitations with Design

  1. None

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

None

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation or AcronymDescription

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

  • ISO 9000

  • ISO/IEC 12207

  • ISO/IEC 15504

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)

  • ISO/IEC 15288

  • ISO 26262

  • IEEE Standards

  • SWEBOK

  • PMBOK

  • Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

TermDefinitionSource
MDDModule Design Document
DFDData Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #TitleVersion
1AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mapping (Link:AUTOSAR_SWS_MemoryMapping.pdf)v1.3.0 R4.0 Rev 2
2MDD GuidelineEA4 01.00.01
3Software Naming Conventions.doc1.0
4Software Design and Coding Standards.doc2.1

3 - TunSelnMngt_PeerReview


Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Source Code
Integration Manual
MDD
PolySpace


Sheet 1: Summary Sheet
























Rev 1.28-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Synergy Project Name:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. ES400A_TunSelnMngt_Impl
Revision / Baseline:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. 1.2.0

























Change Owner:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Kevin Smith
Work CR ID:


EA4#7238





























kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:















































































































































































kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:






















































Reviewed:































YesMDD


YesSource Code


YesPolySpace









































YesIntegration Manual


YesDavinci Files








































































Comments:






























































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.





















Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:



naming convention





































Project contains necessary subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Project contains the correct version of subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Design subproject is correct version








Yes
Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

K. Smith


Review Date :

08/30/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Kathleen C.


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 3: Source Code






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


TunSelnMngt.c

Source File Revision:


4
Header File Name:


TunSelnMngt.h

Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this. 1

























MDD Name:

TunSelnMngt_MDD.docx

Revision:
3

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




ES400A_TunSelnMngt_Design

Revision:
1.0.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







Yes
Comments:

















































for constant names







Yes
Comments:

















































for function names







Yes
Comments:

















































for other names (component, memory







Yes
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)




































All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








Yes
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD








Yes
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD





































All variables are declared at the function level.








Yes
Comments:
























Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:



and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








Yes
Comments:
























All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








Yes
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version: 2.1

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







Yes
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







Yes
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]





































Code formatting (indentation, placement of







Yes
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







Yes
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]





































Memory mapping for non-RTE code







Yes
Comments:










is per standard





































All execution-order-dependent code can be







Yes
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







Yes
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]





































All divides protect against divide by zero







Yes
Comments:










if needed: [N65]





































All integer division and modulus operations







Yes
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]





































All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







Yes
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and













timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







Yes
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]





































All conversions between signed and unsigned







Yes
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]





































All pointer dereferencing protects against







Yes
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







Yes
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]





































All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







Yes
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








Yes
Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:























Change MemCopy functions to cast the destination address instead of assigning it to another pointer locally. This will cause a MISRA warning, but it is an

accepted deviation instead of causing an new MISRA warning that does not have an approved deviation.









LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

K. Smith


Review Date :

08/30/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Kathleen C.


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 4: Integration Manual






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Integration Manual Review)


























Integration Manual Name:



kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which file is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this sheet is not attached to the wrong design review form. ES400A_TunSelnMgnt_Integration_Manual.doc

Integration Manual Revision:



kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the integration manual has been reviewed. Rationale: Required for traceability between the MDD and review. Auditors will likely require this. 4





























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Synergy version matches header








Yes
Comments:










































Latest template used








Yes
Comments:










































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:










































Changes Highlighted (for Integrator)








Yes
Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

K. Smith


Review Date :

08/30/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Kathleen C.


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 5: MDD






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (MDD Review)


























MDD Name:

TunSelnMngt_MDD.docx
MDD Revision:

3


























Source File Name:


TunSelnMngt.cSource File Revision:


4

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:





Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Synergy version matches document








Yes
Comments:













































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:













































Changes Highlighted (for Unit Tester)








Yes
Comments:













































Diagrams have been included per MDD Guideline








Yes
Comments:











and reviewed






































All Design Exceptions and Limitations are listed








Yes
Comments:



















































Design rationale given for all global








Yes
Comments:











data not communicated through RTE ports, per














Design and Coding Standards rules [N9] and [N10].















































All implementation details that differ from the FDD are








Yes
Comments:











noted and explained in Design Rationale






































All Unit Test Considerations have been described








Yes
Comments:



















































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

K. Smith


Review Date :

08/30/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Kathleen C.


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 6: PolySpace






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)


























Source File Name:


TunSelnMngt.cSource File Revision:


4

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:





Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:







1.1.0







Poly Space version:


Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013b
Polyspace sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0 1

QAC version:


Windows User: eg 8.1.1-R 8.1.1-R
QAC sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL_100A_1.1.0 1.2.0


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No



































Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and





kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.


Yes
Comments:




function prototypes match the latest component version







































100% Compliance to the EA4 Static AnalysisNo
Comments:

New deviations need to be documented


Compliance Guideline










but were OK'd

















Are previously added justification and deviation








Yes
Comments:





comments still appropriate






































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved








No
Comments:

See comment above, new ones


deviation tags










need to be added to the document.


























Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK






Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

No
Comments:

IdxChgMngt is one point higher then it needs to be


for all functions in the component per Design














and Coding Standards rule [N47]

































































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

K. Smith


Review Date :

08/30/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Kathleen C.


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):