1 - Adc1CfgAndUse_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual

For

Adc1 Cfg And Use

VERSION: 3.0

DATE: 09-Jun-2016

Prepared By:

Software Group,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA


Location:
The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial versionSelva Sengottaiyan1.04-May-2015
2Updated for design rev. 2.0.0Rijvi2.005-Feb-2016
3Added Newperiodic and removed one server runnableAvinash James3.09-Jun-2016


Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 Non RTE NvM Blocks 10

7.4 RTE NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document
<ADD more to the table if applicable>

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
1FDD – CM320A Adc1CfgAndUseSee synergy sub project version

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
NoneN/A

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

None

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ModulesNotes
None

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

Yes

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

ParameterNotesSWC
Refer the . m file in the design

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
N/A

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
N/A

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Refer DataDict.m file

Required Global Data Outputs

Refer DataDict.m file

Specific Include Path present

Yes

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
Adc1CfgAndUseInit1NoneRTE
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
Adc1CfgAndUsePer1None2ms(RTE)
Adc1CfgAndUsePer2None2ms(RTE)
Adc1CfgAndUseAdc1EnaCnvn_OperNoneOn event

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
None

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM
None

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

*See DataDict.m

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

None

2 - Adc1CfgAndUse_MDD

Module Design Document

ForAdc1 Configuration and use

VERSION: 3.0

DATE: 09-Jun-2016

Prepared By:

Avinash James

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial VersionSelva1.04- May-2015
2Updated per design rev 2.0.0Rijvi2.09-Feb-2016
3Added Periodic 2 and removed server runnableAvinash James3.09-Jun-2016

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 5

2 References 6

3 High-Level Description 7

4 Design details of software module 8

4.1 Graphical representation 8

4.2 Data Flow Diagram 8

4.2.1 Module level DFD 8

4.2.2 Sub-Module level DFD 8

4.3 COMPONENT FLOW DIAGRAM 8

5 Variable Data Dictionary 9

5.1 User defined typedef definition/declaration 9

5.2 Variable definition for enumerated types 9

6 Constant Data Dictionary 10

6.1 Program(fixed) Constants 10

6.1.1 Embedded Constants 10

6.1.1.1 Local 10

6.1.1.2 Global 10

6.1.2 Module specific Lookup Tables Constants 10

7 Software Module Implementation 11

7.1 Sub-Module Functions 11

7.1.1 Initialization Functions 11

7.1.1.1 INIT: Adc1CfgAndUseINIT1 11

7.1.1.2 Design Rationale 11

7.1.2 PERIODIC FUNCTIONS 11

7.1.2.1 Per: Adc1CfgAndUsePer1 11

7.1.2.2 Design Rationale 11

7.1.2.3 Per: Adc1CfgAndUsePer2 11

7.1.2.4 Design Rationale 11

7.2 Interrupt Functions 11

7.3 Server RUNNABLE Functions 12

7.3.1.1 Per: Adc1CfgAndUseAdc1EnaCnvn_Oper 12

7.3.1.2 Design Rationale 12

7.4 Local Function/Macro Definitions 12

7.5 GLObAL Function/Macro Definitions 12

7.5.1 GLObAL Function #1 12

7.5.1.1 Description 12

7.6 TRANSIENT FUNCTIONS 12

8 Known Limitations With Design 13

9 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 14

10 Appendix 15

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document
<ADD more to the table if applicable>

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
1MDD GuidelinesProcess 04.02.01
2Software Naming ConventionsProcess 04.02.01
3Coding standardsProcess 04.02.01
4FDD – CM320A Adc1CfgAndUseSee synergy sub project version
<Add if more available>

High-Level Description

None

Design details of software module

Graphical representation

Data Flow Diagram

Module level DFD

N/A

Sub-Module level DFD

N/A

COMPONENT FLOW DIAGRAM

N/A

Variable Data Dictionary

User defined typedef definition/declaration

<This section documents any user types uniquely used for the module.>

Typedef NameElement NameUser Defined Type

Legal Range

(min)

Legal Range

(max)

N/A

Variable definition for enumerated types

Enum NameElement NameValue
N/A

Constant Data Dictionary

Program(fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

< All program specific constants will be defined in detail >

Local

Constant NameResolutionUnitsValue
Refer . mfile in the design

Global

<This section lists the global constants used by the module. For details on global constants, refer to the Data Dictionary for the application>

Constant Name
Refer . mfile in the design

Module specific Lookup Tables Constants

<(This is for lookup tables (arrays) with fixed values, same name as other tables)>

Constant NameResolutionValueSoftware Segment
<Refer Constant name qualified in [2]><Refer MDD guidelines [1]><Refer MDD guidelines [1]><Refer MDD guidelines [1]>

Software Module Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

None

Initialization Functions

INIT: Adc1CfgAndUseINIT1

Design Rationale

Refer the FDD

PERIODIC FUNCTIONS

(Note: For multiple periodic functions, insert new headers at the “Header 2” level – subset of “7.1.2 Periodic Functions” and follow the same sub-section design shown below). If none required, place the text “None”)>

Per: Adc1CfgAndUsePer1

Design Rationale

Refer the FDD

Per: Adc1CfgAndUsePer2

Design Rationale

Refer the FDD

Interrupt Functions

None

Server RUNNABLE Functions

Per: Adc1CfgAndUseAdc1EnaCnvn_Oper

Design Rationale

Refer the FDD

Local Function/Macro Definitions

None

GLObAL Function/Macro Definitions

GLObAL Function #1

Function Name(Exact name used)TypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNone<Refer MDD guidelines[1]><Refer MDD guidelines[1]><Refer MDD guidelines[1]>
Return ValueN/A

Description

N/A

TRANSIENT FUNCTIONS

None

Known Limitations With Design

  1. None

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

None

Appendix

None

3 - Adc1CfgAndUse_Review


Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Source Code
PolySpace


Sheet 1: Summary Sheet
























Rev 1.28-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Synergy Project Name:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. CM320A_Adc1CfgAndUse_Impl
Revision / Baseline:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. 2.3.0

























Change Owner:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Krishna Anne
Work CR ID:


EA4#7453





























kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:















































































































































































kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:






















































Reviewed:































N/AMDD


YesSource Code


YesPolySpace









































N/AIntegration Manual


N/ADavinci Files








































































Comments:

Reviewed changes alone



























































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.





















Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:



naming convention





































Project contains necessary subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Project contains the correct version of subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Design subproject is correct version








Yes
Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

09/13/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick Saxton


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 3: Source Code






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


CDD_Adc1CfgAndUse.c

Source File Revision:


5
Header File Name:


CDD_Adc1CfgAndUse.h

Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this. 3

























MDD Name:

Adc1CfgAndUse_MDD.doc

Revision:
3

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




CM320A_ADC1CfgAndUse_Design

Revision:
2.3.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







N/A
Comments:

















































for constant names







Yes
Comments:

















































for function names







N/A
Comments:

















































for other names (component, memory







N/A
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)




































All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








N/A
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD








N/A
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD





































All variables are declared at the function level.








N/A
Comments:
























Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:



and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








Yes
Comments:
























All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








Yes
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version: 2.1

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







Yes
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







N/A
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]





































Code formatting (indentation, placement of







Yes
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







Yes
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]





































Memory mapping for non-RTE code







N/A
Comments:










is per standard





































All execution-order-dependent code can be







Yes
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







N/A
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]





































All divides protect against divide by zero







N/A
Comments:










if needed: [N65]





































All integer division and modulus operations







N/A
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]





































All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







N/A
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and













timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







N/A
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]





































All conversions between signed and unsigned







N/A
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]





































All pointer dereferencing protects against







N/A
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







N/A
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]





































All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







Yes
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








N/A
Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:

















































































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

09/13/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick Saxton


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 4: PolySpace






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)


























Source File Name:


CDD_Adc1CfgAndUse.c




Source File Revision:


5

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:





Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:







1.1.0











Poly Space version:


Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013b
Polyspace sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0 N/A

QAC version:


Windows User: eg 8.1.1-R 8.1.1-R
QAC sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL_100A_1.1.0 1.2.0


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No



































Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and





kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.


Yes
Comments:




function prototypes match the latest component version







































100% Compliance to the EA4 Static AnalysisYes
Comments:





Compliance Guideline





























Are previously added justification and deviation








Yes
Comments:





comments still appropriate






































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved








Yes
Comments:





deviation tags






































Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK






Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

Yes
Comments:





for all functions in the component per Design














and Coding Standards rule [N47]

































































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

09/13/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick Saxton


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):









































































4 - requirements

FDDIDSourceFunctionLine(s)StatusComment
.SwFileName.SwFuncName.SwLines.SwStatus.SwComment
CM320A77CDD_Adc1CfgAndUse.cAdc1CfgAndUsePer2277-310I
CM320A76CDD_Adc1CfgAndUse.cAdc1CfgAndUseInit1212I
CM320A75CDD_Adc1CfgAndUse.cAdc1CfgAndUsePer2277-310I
CM320A93CDD_Adc1CfgAndUse.cAdc1CfgAndUsePer2277-310I