1 - HwTq1Meas_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual

For

HwTq1Meas

VERSION: 3.0

DATE: 21-Dec-2015

Prepared By:

Software Group,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial versionRijvi Ahmed1.011-Aug-2015
2Updated for CM660A_HwTq1Meas_Design_1.4.0Selva2.014-Oct-2015
3Updated for CM660A_HwTq1Meas_Design_1.6.0Selva3.021-Dec-2015

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document
FDDFunctional Design Document

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
1FDD – CM660A HwTq1MeasSee Synergy subproject version
2Software Naming ConventionsProcess 04.02.00
3Software Coding StandardsProcess 04.02.00

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
None

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

None

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ModulesNotes
None

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

CDD_HwTq1Meas_Cfg.h

Note: Temporarily this file can be copied from the contract folder. Later revision will have the Davinci configuration parameter to generate the file.

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

ParameterNotesSWC
None

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
None

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
None

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Refer DataDict.m file

Required Global Data Outputs

Refer DataDict.m file

Specific Include Path present

Yes

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
HwTq1MeasInit1NoneRTE (Init)
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
HwTq1MeasPer1NoneRTE (2 ms)
HwTq1MeasPer2NoneRTE (100 ms)
HwTq1MeasHwTq1AutTrim_OperNoneOn event
HwTq1MeasHwTq1ClrTrim_OperNoneOn event
HwTq1MeasHwTq1ReadTrim_OperNoneOn event
HwTq1MeasHwTq1TrimPrfmdSts_OperNoneOn event
HwTq1MeasHwTq1WrTrim_OperNoneOn event
HwTq1MeasTrigStrt_OperNoneOn event

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
None

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM
None

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

*See DataDict.m

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

Port Configuration SENT1SPCO output:

Port (that’s needs to be configured as SENT1SPCO) should be initialized as input DIO with level high.

The client call IoHwAb_SetFctPrphlHwTq1_Oper will reset the pin to output Alterante mode for SENT1SPCO.

2 - HwTq1Meas_MDD

Module Design Document

For

HandWheel Torque 1 Measurement

Dec 21 2015

Prepared For:

Software Engineering

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Prepared By:

Software Group,

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USAChange History

DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
Initial VersionRijvi Ahmed1.011-Aug-2015
Inplement Rack Limiter EOTRijvi Ahmed2.018-Sep-2015
Updated for CM660A_HwTq1Meas_Design_1.4.0Selva3.014-Oct-2015
Updated for CM660A_HwTq1Meas_Design_1.6.0Selva4.021-Dec-15

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 5

1.1 Purpose 5

2 HwTq1Meas & High-Level Description 6

3 Design details of software module 7

3.1 Graphical representation of HwTq1Meas 7

3.2 Data Flow Diagram 7

3.2.1 Component level DFD 7

3.2.2 Function level DFD 7

4 Constant Data Dictionary 8

4.1 Program (fixed) Constants 8

4.1.1 Embedded Constants 8

5 Software Component Implementation 9

5.1 Sub-Module Functions 9

5.1.1 Init: HwTq1MeasInit1 9

5.1.1.1 Design Rationale 9

5.1.1.2 Module Outputs 9

5.1.2 Per: HwTq1MeasPer1 9

5.1.2.1 Design Rationale 9

5.1.2.2 Store Module Inputs to Local copies 9

5.1.2.3 (Processing of function)……… 9

5.1.2.4 Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs 9

5.1.3 Per: HwTq1MeasPer2 9

5.1.3.1 Design Rationale 9

5.1.3.2 Store Module Inputs to Local copies 10

5.1.3.3 (Processing of function)……… 10

5.1.3.4 Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs 10

5.2 Server Runables 10

5.2.1 HwTq1MeasHwTq1AutTrim_oper 10

5.2.1.1 Design Rationale 10

5.2.1.2 (Processing of function)……… 10

5.2.2 HwTq1MeasHwTq1ClrTrim_Oper 10

5.2.2.1 Design Rationale 10

5.2.2.2 (Processing of function)……… 10

5.2.3 HwTq1MeasHwTq1ReadTrim_Oper 10

5.2.3.1 Design Rationale 10

5.2.3.2 (Processing of function)……… 10

5.2.4 HwTq1MeasHwTq1TrimPrfmdSts_Oper 10

5.2.4.1 Design Rationale 10

5.2.4.2 (Processing of function)……… 11

5.2.5 HwTq1MeasHwTq1WrTrim_Oper 11

5.2.5.1 Design Rationale 11

5.2.5.2 (Processing of function)……… 11

5.2.6 HwTq1MeasTrigStrt_Oper 11

5.2.6.1 Design Rationale 11

5.2.6.2 (Processing of function)……… 11

5.3 Interrupt Functions 11

5.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 11

5.4.1 Local Function #1 11

5.4.1.1 Design Rationale 11

5.4.2 Local Function #2 11

5.4.2.1 Design Rationale 12

5.5 GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions 12

6 Known Limitations with Design 13

7 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 14

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 15

Appendix B Glossary 16

Appendix C References 18

Introduction

Purpose

Module design document for Hand Wheel Torque 1 Measurement Function.

HwTq1Meas & High-Level Description

This module configures and processes the RSENT1 peripheral, which is connected to the handwheel torque 1 sensor. The module configures the peripheral, triggers transfers, and processes the received data.

This module also reads and provides the rack limiter EOT information which is stored in torque sensor 1 scratchpad.

Design details of software module

Graphical representation of HwTq1Meas

Data Flow Diagram

Component level DFD

N/A

Function level DFD

N/A

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

Constant NameResolutionUnitsValue
STSFLTMASK_CNT_U321Cnt0x000000FEUL
TQDATAMASK_CNT_U321Cnt0x00000FFFUL
SENTSYNCTRIG_CNT_U321Cnt16UL
REGCFGWAITTI_CNT_U321Cnt2UL
RACKLIMREOTSIGHILIM_HWDEG_F32Single point precisionHwDeg(800.0F)
RACKLIMREOTSIGLOLIM_HWDEG_F32Single point precisionHwDeg(-800.0F)
RACKLIMRCCWEOTSCA_ULS_F32Single point precisionUls(-0.1953F)
RACKLIMRCWEOTSCA_ULS_F32Single point precisionUls(0.1953F)
EOTCSMASK_CNT_U321Cnt0x00000700UL
EOTIDTWO_CNT_U081Cnt2U
EOTIDTHREE_CNT_U081Cnt3U
EOTIDFOUR_CNT_U081Cnt4U
EOTDATAMASK_CNT_U321Cnt0x00000FF0UL
EOTIDMASK_CNT_U321Cnt0x0000000FUL
FRSMASK_CNT_U321Cnt0x00000001UL
CSMASK_CNT_U321Cnt0x000000FEUL
FCCNMASK_CNT_U321Cnt0x30000000UL
SLOWMSGDATAMASK_CNT_U321Cnt0x80000000UL

Software Component Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

The sub-module functions are grouped based on similar functionality that needs to be executed in a given “State” of the system (refer States and Modes). For a given module, the MDD will identify the type and number of sub-modules required. The sub-module types are described below.

Init: HwTq1MeasInit1

Design Rationale

Magic numbers are used due to the large number of numeric values (for peripheral register configuration), it is more readable and easier to maintain without using embedded constants for these values. The values are shown in code comments, and line up exactly with the definitions given in the design module (a special spreadsheet was included in the design for this purpose).

See CM660A_HwTq1Meas_RSENTPeripheralCfg.xlsx in design module.

Module Outputs

Refer to FDD

Per: HwTq1MeasPer1

Design Rationale

None

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

Refer to FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer to FDD

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

Refer to FDD

Per: HwTq1MeasPer2

Design Rationale

None

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

Refer to FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer to FDD

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

Refer to FDD

Server Runables

HwTq1MeasHwTq1AutTrim_oper

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

See block “HwTq1MeasHwTq1AutTrim” in the Simulink model of the design.

HwTq1MeasHwTq1ClrTrim_Oper

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

See block “HwTq1MeasHwTq1ClrTrim” in the Simulink model of the design.

HwTq1MeasHwTq1ReadTrim_Oper

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

See block “HwTq1MeasHwTq1ReadTrim” in the Simulink model of the design.

HwTq1MeasHwTq1TrimPrfmdSts_Oper

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

See block “HwTq1MeasHwTq1TrimPrfmdSts” in the Simulink model of the design.

HwTq1MeasHwTq1WrTrim_Oper

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

See block “HwTq1MeasHwTq1WrTrim” in the Simulink model of the design.

HwTq1MeasTrigStrt_Oper

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

See block “HwTq1MeasTrigStrt” in the Simulink model of the design.

Interrupt Functions

None

Module Internal (Local) Functions

Local Function #1

Function NameRackLimrEotSigReadTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedNoneN/AN/AN/A
Return ValueN/AN/AN/AN/A

Design Rationale

See RackLimrEot/RackLimrEotSigRead block in the Simulink model of the design.

Local Function #2

Function NameReadRegisterTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedRegisterDummyRead_Cnt_T_u32N/AN/AN/A
Return ValueRegisterDummyRead_Cnt_T_u32N/AN/AN/A

Design Rationale

This function can be used both for read-and-use and for read-and-discard

GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions

None

Known Limitations with Design

None

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

Overflow for the variables Rte_Pim_HwTq1MeasPrevRollgCntr, Rte_Pim_HwTq1MsgMissRxCnt, Rte_Pim_HwTq1ComStsErrCntr, Rte_Pim_HwTq1IntSnsrErrCntr are intentional as these are used as rolling counters.

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation or AcronymDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

  • ISO 9000

  • ISO/IEC 12207

  • ISO/IEC 15504

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)

  • ISO/IEC 15288

  • ISO 26262

  • IEEE Standards

  • SWEBOK

  • PMBOK

  • Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

TermDefinitionSource
MDDModule Design Document
DFDData Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #TitleVersion
1AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mapping (Link:AUTOSAR_SWS_MemoryMapping.pdf)v1.3.0 R4.0 Rev 2
2MDD GuidelineEA4 01.00.00
3Software Naming Conventions.doc1.0
4Software Design and Coding Standards.doc2.0
5FDD – CM660A HwTq1MeasSee Synergy subproject version

3 - HwTq1Meas_PeerReviewChecklist


Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Davinci Files
Source Code
PolySpace


Sheet 1: Summary Sheet
























Rev 1.28-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Synergy Project Name:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. CM660A_HwTq1Meas_Impl
Revision / Baseline:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. 1.6.0

























Change Owner:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Krishna Anne
Work CR ID:


EA4#4929





























kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:















































































































































































kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:






















































Reviewed:































N/AMDD


YesSource Code


YesPolySpace









































N/AIntegration Manual


YesDavinci Files








































































Comments:

Reviewed changes only



























































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.





















Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:



naming convention





































Project contains necessary subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Project contains the correct version of subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Design subproject is correct version








Yes
Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

04/04/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick saxton


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 3: Davinci Files






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Davinci Review)


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Only StdDef Port types are used








Yes
Comments:










































For components not using application data types, do all








Yes
Comments:



port interface names end in PortIf and a sequence number





























































Non-program-specific components saved








Yes
Comments:




in Autosar 4.0.3 format




































*Cfg.arxml.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator imported the








N/A
Comments:




change correctly




































*Cfg.h.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator generates








N/A
Comments:










the configuration header(s) file correctly
kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify



























kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify
















All changed files have been compared against previous








Yes
Comments:




versions (If available)

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify if previous version was compared and only the expected change(s) was present. This is for text files only, not binary or GUIs Rationale: This is helpful in identifying unapproved (intended or mistaken) changes.


































Automated validation check is performed








Yes
Comments:

























































Naming conventions followed. All names should








Yes
Comments:










match DataDict.m













































Sender/Receiver port properties match DataDict.m








Yes
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Calibration port properties match DataDict.m








Yes
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Components using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file














































Calibration port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file













































Components not using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







Yes
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Calibration port initialization values match







Yes
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Mapping set and all unused items have been







Yes
Comments:










removed













































All sender/receiver port read/writes using direct








Yes
Comments:










read/writes(List justification if not)













































Runnable calling frequencies match FDD








Yes
Comments:

































DataDict.m display variables: created as








Yes
Comments:









PerInstanceMemory. Matches the FDD





































Component is correct component type








Yes
Comments:











































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne
Review Date :

04/04/16
Component Type :


Complex Driver



























Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick Saxton
Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes

































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 4: Source Code






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


CDD_HwTq1Meas.c

Source File Revision:


7
Header File Name:


CDD_HwTq1Meas.h

Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this. 2

























MDD Name:

HwTq1Meas_MDD.doc

Revision:
4

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




CM660A_HwTq1Meas_Design

Revision:
1.9.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







Yes
Comments:

















































for constant names







N/A
Comments:

















































for function names







N/A
Comments:

















































for other names (component, memory







Yes
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)




































All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








Yes
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD








Yes
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD





































All variables are declared at the function level.








Yes
Comments:
























Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:



and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








Yes
Comments:
























All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








Yes
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version: 2.1

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







Yes
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







Yes
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]





































Code formatting (indentation, placement of







Yes
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







Yes
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]





































Memory mapping for non-RTE code







Yes
Comments:










is per standard





































All execution-order-dependent code can be







Yes
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







Yes
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]





































All divides protect against divide by zero







N/A
Comments:










if needed: [N65]





































All integer division and modulus operations







N/A
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]





































All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







N/A
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and













timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







N/A
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]





































All conversions between signed and unsigned







N/A
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]





































All pointer dereferencing protects against







Yes
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







N/A
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]





































All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







Yes
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








N/A
Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:

















































































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

04/04/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick Saxton


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 5: PolySpace






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)


























Source File Name:


CDD_HwTq1Meas











Source File Revision:


7

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:





Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:







01.01.00














Poly Space version:


Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013b





Polyspace sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0 TL108A_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0






QAC version:


Windows User: eg 8.1.1-R 8.1.1-R





QAC sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL_100A_1.1.0 TL100A_QACSuprt_1.2.0































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No



































Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and





kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.


Yes
Comments:




function prototypes match the latest component version







































100% Compliance to the EA4 Static AnalysisYes
Comments:





Compliance Guideline





























Are previously added justification and deviation








Yes
Comments:





comments still appropriate






































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved








Yes
Comments:





deviation tags






































Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK






Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

Yes
Comments:





for all functions in the component per Design














and Coding Standards rule [N47]

































































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Krishna Anne


Review Date :

04/04/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick Saxton


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):









































































4 - requirements

FDDIDSourceFunctionLine(s)StatusComment
.SwFileName.SwFuncName.SwLines.SwStatus.SwComment
CM660A30CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11244I
CM660A42CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11140-1145I
CM660A29CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11171-1185I
CM660A61CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer21281-1290I
CM660A63CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer21281-1290I
CM660A65CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer21281-1290I
CM660A67CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer21281-1290I
CM660A26CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11184I
CM660A27CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11066-1247I
CM660A48CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11129-1134I
CM660A49CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11120-1124I
CM660A46CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11141-1146I
CM660A47CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11154-1159I
CM660A44CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11141-1146I
CM660A45CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11141-1146I
CM660A28CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11129-1134I
CM660A43CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11140-1145I
CM660A40CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11140-1145I
CM660A41CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11140-1145I
CM660A76CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11225I
CM660A75CDD_HwTq1Meas.cRackLimrEotSigRead1425I
CM660A71CDD_HwTq1Meas.cRackLimrEotSigRead1411-1419I
CM660A70CDD_HwTq1Meas.cRackLimrEotSigRead1411-1419,1423,1424I
CM660A39CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11066-1247I
CM660A38CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11198,1203I
CM660A55CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasHwTq1WrTrim_Oper909-916I
CM660A54CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasHwTq1ClrTrim_Oper799-806I
CM660A31CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11245I
CM660A56CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasHwTq1AutTrim_Oper751-758I
CM660A50CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasHwTq1AutTrim_Oper,HwTq1MeasHwTq1ClrTrim_Oper,HwTq1MeasHwTq1WrTrim_Oper,HwTq1MeasPer1751-758,799-806,909-916,1175I
CM660A53CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasHwTq1TrimPrfmdSts_Oper868I
CM660A52CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasHwTq1ReadTrim_Oper837I
CM660A33CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasTrigStrt_Oper1336-1353I
CM660A32CDD_HwTq1Meas.cHwTq1MeasPer11171-1185I