1 - MotCurrRegCfg_DesignReview


Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Davinci Files
Source Code
MDD
PolySpace


Sheet 1: Summary Sheet
























Rev 1.28-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Synergy Project Name:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. SF104A_MotCurrRegCfg_Impl
Revision / Baseline:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. SF104A_MotCurrRegCfg_Impl_2.2.0

























Change Owner:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Jayakrishnan T
Work CR ID:


EA4#7543





























kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:















































































































































































kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:






















































Reviewed:































YesMDD


YesSource Code


YesPolySpace









































N/AIntegration Manual


YesDavinci Files








































































Comments:






























































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.





















Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:



naming convention





































Project contains necessary subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Project contains the correct version of subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Design subproject is correct version








Yes
Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Jayakrishnan T


Review Date :

11/18/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Avinash


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):


Krishna
Shruthi




































































Sheet 3: Davinci Files






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Davinci Review)


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Only StdDef Port types are used








Yes
Comments:










































For components not using application data types, do all








N/A
Comments:



port interface names end in PortIf and a sequence number





























































Non-program-specific components saved








Yes
Comments:




in Autosar 4.0.3 format




































*Cfg.arxml.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator imported the








N/A
Comments:




change correctly




































*Cfg.h.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator generates








N/A
Comments:










the configuration header(s) file correctly
kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify



























kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify
















All changed files have been compared against previous








Yes
Comments:




versions (If available)

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify if previous version was compared and only the expected change(s) was present. This is for text files only, not binary or GUIs Rationale: This is helpful in identifying unapproved (intended or mistaken) changes.


































Automated validation check is performed








Yes
Comments:

























































Naming conventions followed. All names should








Yes
Comments:










match DataDict.m













































Sender/Receiver port properties match DataDict.m








Yes
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Calibration port properties match DataDict.m








N/A
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Components using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







Yes
Comments:










DataDict.m file














































Calibration port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file













































Components not using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Calibration port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Mapping set and all unused items have been







N/A
Comments:










removed













































All sender/receiver port read/writes using direct








Yes
Comments:










read/writes(List justification if not)













































Runnable calling frequencies match FDD








Yes
Comments:

































DataDict.m display variables: created as








N/A
Comments:









PerInstanceMemory. Matches the FDD





































Component is correct component type








Yes
Comments:











































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Jayakrishnan T


Review Date :

11/18/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Avinash


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):


Krishna
Shruthi




































































Sheet 4: Source Code






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


MotCurrRegCfg.c

Source File Revision:


6
Header File Name:


N/A

Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this. N/A

























MDD Name:

MotCurrRegCfg_MDD.doc

Revision:
4

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




SF104_MotCurrRegCfg_Design

Revision:
2.2.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







Yes
Comments:

















































for constant names







Yes
Comments:

















































for function names







N/A
Comments:

















































for other names (component, memory







N/A
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)




































All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








Yes
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD








N/A
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD





































All variables are declared at the function level.








Yes
Comments:
























Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:



and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








N/A
Comments:
























All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








Yes
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version: 2.1

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







Yes
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







N/A
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]





































Code formatting (indentation, placement of







Yes
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







Yes
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]





































Memory mapping for non-RTE code







N/A
Comments:










is per standard





































All execution-order-dependent code can be







Yes
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







N/A
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]





































All divides protect against divide by zero







N/A
Comments:










if needed: [N65]





































All integer division and modulus operations







N/A
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]





































All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







N/A
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and













timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







N/A
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]





































All conversions between signed and unsigned







N/A
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]





































All pointer dereferencing protects against







N/A
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







N/A
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]





































All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







N/A
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








N/A
Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:
















































Reviewed only for the changes































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Jayakrishnan T


Review Date :

11/18/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Avinash


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):


Krishna
Shruthi




































































Sheet 5: MDD






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (MDD Review)


























MDD Name:


MotCurrRegCfg_MDD.doc




MDD Revision:

4


























Source File Name:



MotCurrRegCfg.c



Source File Revision:


6

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:





Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Synergy version matches document








Yes
Comments:













































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:













































Changes Highlighted (for Unit Tester)








Yes
Comments:













































Diagrams have been included per MDD Guideline








Yes
Comments:











and reviewed






































All Design Exceptions and Limitations are listed








Yes
Comments:



















































Design rationale given for all global








N/A
Comments:











data not communicated through RTE ports, per














Design and Coding Standards rules [N9] and [N10].















































All implementation details that differ from the FDD are








N/A
Comments:











noted and explained in Design Rationale






































All Unit Test Considerations have been described








Yes
Comments:



















































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Jayakrishnan T


Review Date :

11/18/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Avinash


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):


Krishna
Shruthi




































































Sheet 6: PolySpace






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)


























Source File Name:



MotCurrRegCfg.c



Source File Revision:


6

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:





Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:








01.01.00









Poly Space version:


Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013b
Polyspace sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0 NA

QAC version:


Windows User: eg 8.1.1-R 8.1.1-R
QAC sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL_100A_1.1.0 1.2.0


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No



































Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and





kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.


Yes
Comments:




function prototypes match the latest component version







































100% Compliance to the EA4 Static AnalysisYes
Comments:

See comments below


Compliance Guideline





























Are previously added justification and deviation








Yes
Comments:





comments still appropriate






































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved








Yes
Comments:





deviation tags






































Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK






Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

Yes
Comments:





for all functions in the component per Design














and Coding Standards rule [N47]

































































































General Notes / Comments:


























Warning for MISRA Rule 11.5 appears to be a bug in polyspace - CONST qualifier is present

Warning for Misra rule 12.3 is caused by gnenerated contract header file by having function call for cals. Not a deviation.

























LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Jayakrishnan T


Review Date :

11/18/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Avinash


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):


Krishna
Shruthi



































































2 - MotCurrRegCfg_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual

For

MotCurrRegCfg

VERSION: 1.0

DATE: <02-JUN-2015>

Prepared By:

Selva Sengottaiyan

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial versionSelva Sengottaiyan1.002-Jun-2015

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document
<ADD more to the table if applicable>

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
<1><MDD Guidelines>Process 4.00.00
<2><Software Naming Conventions>Process 4.00.00
<3><Coding standards>Process 4.00.00
<4>FDD – SF104A_MotCurrRegCfg_DesignSee Synergy Subproject version
<Add if more available>

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
NoneN/A

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

None

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ConstantsNotes
None

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

<Configuration file that will generated from this components that will require Da Vinci Config generation or manual generation. Describe each parameter >

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

ParameterNotesSWC
N/A

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
N/A

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
N/A

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Refer DataDict.m file

Required Global Data Outputs

Refer DataDict.m file

Specific Include Path present

No

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
MotCurrRegCfgInit1NoneRTE
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
MotCurrRegCfgPer1NoneRTE(2ms)

.

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
None

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM
None

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

None

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

None

3 - MotCurrRegCfg_MDD

Module Design Document

For

MotCurrRegCfg

VERSION: 4.0

DATE: 11-Nov-2016

Prepared By:

Software Group

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial VersionSelva1.002-JUN-2015
2Updated per design rev. 1.3.0Rijvi2.012-Mar-2016
3Updated per design rev. 1.4.0Krishna3.029-Apr-2016
4Updated per design rev. 2.1.0JK4.011-Nov-2016

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 5

2 References 6

3 MotCurrRegCfg & High-Level Description 7

4 Design details of software module 8

4.1 Graphical representation of MotCurrRegCfg 8

4.2 Data Flow Diagram 8

4.2.1 Module level DFD 8

4.2.2 Sub-Module level DFD 8

4.3 COMPONENT FLOW DIAGRAM 8

5 Variable Data Dictionary 9

5.1 User defined typedef definition/declaration 9

5.2 Variable definition for enumerated types 9

6 Constant Data Dictionary 10

6.1 Program(fixed) Constants 10

6.1.1 Embedded Constants 10

6.1.1.1 Local 10

6.1.1.2 Global 10

6.1.2 Module specific Lookup Tables Constants 10

7 Software Module Implementation 11

7.1 Sub-Module Functions 11

7.2 Initialization Functions 11

7.2.1 Per: MotCurrRegCfgINIT1 11

7.2.1.1 Design Rationale 11

7.2.1.2 Store Module Inputs to Local copies 11

7.2.1.3 (Processing of function)……… 11

7.2.1.4 Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs 11

7.3 PERIODIC FUNCTIONS 11

7.3.1 Per: MotCurrRegCfgper1 11

7.3.1.1 Design Rationale 11

7.3.1.2 Store Module Inputs to Local copies 11

7.3.1.3 (Processing of function)……… 11

7.3.1.4 Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs 11

7.4 Non PERIODIC FUNCTIONS 11

7.5 Interrupt Functions 11

7.6 Serial Communication Functions 12

7.7 Local Function/Macro Definitions 12

7.8 GLObAL Function/Macro Definitions 12

7.9 TRANSIENT FUNCTIONS 12

8 Unit Test Considerations 13

9 Known Limitations With Design 14

10 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 15

11 Appendix 16

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document
<ADD more to the table if applicable>

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
<1><MDD Guidelines>Process 04.02.01
<2><Software Naming Conventions>Process 04.02.01
<3><Coding standards>Process 04.02.01
<4>FDD - SF104A_MotCurrRegCfg_DesignSee Synergy Subproject version
<Add if more available>

MotCurrRegCfg & High-Level Description

Design details of software module

Graphical representation of MotCurrRegCfg

Data Flow Diagram

Module level DFD

Sub-Module level DFD

COMPONENT FLOW DIAGRAM

Variable Data Dictionary

User defined typedef definition/declaration

Typedef NameElement NameUser Defined Type

Legal Range

(min)

Legal Range

(max)

N/A

Variable definition for enumerated types

Enum NameElement NameValue
N/A<(Variable name qualified Refer[2])><Define the value >

Constant Data Dictionary

Program(fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

< All program specific constants will be defined in detail >

Local

Constant NameResolutionUnitsValue
Refer constants from .m file

Global

<This section lists the global constants used by the module. For details on global constants, refer to the Data Dictionary for the application>

Constant Name
Refer constants from .m file

Module specific Lookup Tables Constants

<(This is for lookup tables (arrays) with fixed values, same name as other tables)>

Constant NameResolutionValueSoftware Segment
Refer .m file

Software Module Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

NONE

Initialization Functions

Per: MotCurrRegCfgINIT1

Design Rationale

Refer to FDD

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

Refer to FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer to FDD

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

Refer to FDD

PERIODIC FUNCTIONS

Per: MotCurrRegCfgper1

Design Rationale

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

Refer to FDD

(Processing of function)………

Refer to FDD

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

Refer to FDD

Non PERIODIC FUNCTIONS

None

Interrupt Functions

None

Serial Communication Functions

None

Local Function/Macro Definitions

None

GLObAL Function/Macro Definitions

None

TRANSIENT FUNCTIONS

None

Unit Test Considerations

None

Known Limitations With Design

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

The range of the application data type used for the calibration MotCurrRegCfgMotClsdLoopBwDaxY and MotCurrRegCfgMotNatFrqQaxY are not updated per the DataDict.m file changes. We moved away using the application data type, hence it has no impact.

Appendix

None

4 - requirements

FDDIDSourceFunctionLine(s)StatusComment
.SwFileName.SwFuncName.SwLines.SwStatus.SwComment
SF104A91MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1320-325I
SF104A88MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1404I
SF104A86MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1405-423I
SF104A118MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1419,420I
SF104A84MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1330-427I
SF104A85MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1334-341I
SF104A27MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1307I
SF104A49MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1451I
SF104A46MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1304I
SF104A47MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1305I
SF104A44MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1302I
SF104A45MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1306I
SF104A28MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1450I
SF104A43MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1308I
SF104A119MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1303I
SF104A77MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1352-384I
SF104A76MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1353-383I
SF104A74MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1436-440I
SF104A71MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1437-441I
SF104A102MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1347-425I
SF104A95MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1319-324I
SF104A94MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1318-323I
SF104A79MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1331,390-396I
SF104A78MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1346-398I
SF104A120MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1301I
SF104A55MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1445I
SF104A54MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1447I
SF104A57MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgInit1,MotCurrRegCfgPer1219-221,310-315I
SF104A51MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1448I
SF104A36MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1300-452I
SF104A53MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1446I
SF104A52MotCurrRegCfg.cMotCurrRegCfgPer1449I