This is the multi-page printable view of this section. Click here to print.

Return to the regular view of this page.

Component Implementation

1 - PullCmpActv_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual

For

Active Pull Compensation

VERSION:1.0

DATE: 16-OCT-2015

Prepared By:

Akhil Krishna N D (Tata Elxsi)

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial versionAkhil Krishna N D1.010/16/2015

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 Non RTE NvM Blocks 10

7.4 RTE NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document
<ADD more to the table if applicable>

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
1FDD : SF013A_PullCmpActv_DesignSee Synergy sub project version
2Software Naming ConventionsProcess 4.02.00
3Software Design and Coding StandardsProcess 4.02.00

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
NoneN/A

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

None

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ModulesNotes
None

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

<Configuration file that will generated from this components that will require Da Vinci Config generation or manual generation. Describe each parameter >

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

ParameterNotesSWC
None

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
None

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
None

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Refer DataDict.m file.

Required Global Data Outputs

Refer DataDict.m file.

Specific Include Path present

No

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
PullCmpActvInit1NoneRTE(Init)
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
PullCmpActvPer1NoneRTE (2 ms)
PullCmpActvPer2NoneRTE (100 ms)
GetPullCmpPrm_OperNoneOn event
SetPullCmpLongTerm_OperNoneOn event
SetPullCmpShoTerm_OperNoneOn event
RstPullCmp_OperNoneOn event

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
None

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM
None

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

RTE NvM Blocks

Block Name
PullCmpLongTerm

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

None

2 - PullCmpActv_MDD

Module Design Document

For

June 21, 2016 Prepared For:

Nexteer Automotive,

Prepared By:

Spandana Balani,

Nexteer Automotive,


Change History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial VersionAkhil Krishna N D1.016-Oct-2015
2Updated to FDD version SF013A_PullCmpActv_Design_1.4.0SB2.029-Feb-2016
3Updated to design version SF013A_PullCmpActv_Design_1.6.0SN3.020-Jun-2016


Table of Contents

1 Introduction 5

1.1 Purpose 5

1.2 Scope 5

2 Active Pull Compensation & High-Level Description 6

3 Design details of software module 7

3.1 Graphical representation of Active Pull Compensation 7

3.2 Data Flow Diagram 8

3.2.1 Component level DFD 8

3.2.2 Function level DFD 8

4 Constant Data Dictionary 9

4.1 Program (fixed) Constants 9

4.1.1 Embedded Constants 9

5 Software Component Implementation 10

5.1 Sub-Module Functions 10

5.1.1 Init: PullCmpActvInit1 10

5.1.1.1 Design Rationale 10

5.1.1.2 Module Outputs 10

5.1.2 Per: PullCmpActvPer1 10

5.1.2.1 Design Rationale 10

5.1.2.2 Store Module Inputs to Local copies 10

5.1.2.3 (Processing of function)……… 10

5.1.2.4 Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs 10

5.1.3 Per: PullCmpActvPer2 10

5.1.3.1 Design Rationale 10

5.1.3.2 Store Module Inputs to Local copies 10

5.1.3.3 (Processing of function)……… 10

5.1.3.4 Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs 10

5.2 Server Runnables 11

5.2.1 GetPullCmpPrm 11

5.2.1.1 Design Rationale 11

5.2.1.2 (Processing of function)……… 11

5.2.2 RstPullCmp 11

5.2.2.1 Design Rationale 11

5.2.2.2 (Processing of function)……… 11

5.2.3 SetPullCmpLongTerm 11

5.2.3.1 Design Rationale 11

5.2.3.2 (Processing of function)……… 11

5.2.4 SetPullCmpShoTerm 11

5.2.4.1 Design Rationale 11

5.2.4.2 (Processing of function)……… 11

5.3 Interrupt Functions 11

5.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 11

5.4.1 Local Function #1 11

5.4.1.1 Design Rationale 12

5.4.1.2 Processing 12

5.4.2 Local Function #2 12

5.4.2.1 Design Rationale 12

5.4.2.2 Processing 12

5.4.3 Local Function #1 12

5.4.3.1 Design Rationale 13

5.4.3.2 Processing 13

5.5 GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions 13

5.5.1 GLOBAL Function #1 13

5.5.1.1 Design Rationale 13

5.5.1.2 processing 13

6 Known Limitations with Design 14

7 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 15

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 16

Appendix B Glossary 17

Appendix C References 18

Active Pull Compensation & High-Level Description

The Active Pull Compensation Function corrects vehicle pull issues by compensating for HW torque offsets detected by the steering system. These torque offsets are classified as short-term and long-term, each of which is compensated for independently by the algorithm. When the compensation is applied, the need for the driver to provide a constant input torque to counter these offsets is greatly reduced.

Design details of software module

Graphical representation of Active Pull Compensation

Data Flow Diagram

Please refer FDD.

Component level DFD

Please refer FDD.

Function level DFD

Please refer FDD.

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

Constant NameResolutionUnitsValue
Please refer .m file

Software Component Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

Init: PullCmpActvInit1

Design Rationale

None

Module Outputs

None

Per: PullCmpActvPer1

Design Rationale

None

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

None

(Processing of function)………

Please refer FDD

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

Please refer FDD

Per: PullCmpActvPer2

Design Rationale

Please refer FDD.

Store Module Inputs to Local copies

Please refer FDD and design rationale noted above.

(Processing of function)………

Please refer FDD.

Store Local copy of outputs into Module Outputs

None

Server Runnables

GetPullCmpPrm

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

See GetPullCmpPrm block in FDD

RstPullCmp

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

See RstPullCmp block in FDD

SetPullCmpLongTerm

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

See SetPullCmpLongTerm block in FDD

SetPullCmpShoTerm

Design Rationale

None

(Processing of function)………

See SetPullCmpShoTerm block in FDD

Interrupt Functions

None

Module Internal (Local) Functions

Local Function #1

Function NameActvCmpEnaTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedPullCmpActvShoTermRst_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AbslHwTqFild_HwNwtMtr_T_f32float320.010.0
AbslHwAg_HwDeg_T_f32float320.01440.0
AbslVehYawRateFild_VehDegPerSec_T_f32float320.0128.0
AbslVehLatA_MtrPerSecSqd_T_f32float320.010.0
PinionAgConf_Uls_T_f32float320.01.0
VehSpd_Kph_T_f32float320.0511.0
VehSpdVld_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
AbslHwVel_HwRadPerSec_T_f32float320.042.0
PullCmpSts_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueLrngEnad_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE

Design Rationale

None

Processing

(Place flowchart/design for local function)

Refer to the “ActvCmpEna” block of the Simulink model of the design.

Local Function #2

Function NameCalcIntgrGainTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedHwTq_HwNwtMtr_T_f32float32-10.010.0
PullCmpShoTermPrev_HwNwtMtr_T_f32float32-10.010.0
Return ValueIntgtrGainShoTerm_Uls_T_f32float320.01.0

Design Rationale

None

Processing

(Place flowchart/design for local function)

Refer to the “CalcIntgtrGain” block of the Simulink model of the design

Local Function #3

Function NameErrIntgtrActvLimTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedPullCmpActvShoTermRst_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
IntgtrGainShoTerm_Uls_T_f32float320.01.0
PullErrShoTerm_HwNwtMtr_T_f32float32-10.010.0
PullCmpShoTermPrev_HwNwtMtr_T_f32float32-10.010.0
RampDwnStepSize_HwNwtMtr_T_f32float320.00.6
ShoTermRst_Cnt_T_loglbooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValuePullCmpShoTerm_HwNwtMtr_T_f32float32-10.010.0

Design Rationale

None

Processing

(Place flowchart/design for local function)

Refer to the “ErrIntgtr&ActvLim” block of the Simulink model of the design.

GLOBAL Function/Macro Definitions

GLOBAL Function #1

None

Design Rationale

processing

(Place flowchart/design for local function)

Known Limitations with Design

None.

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

None.

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation or AcronymDescription

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

  • ISO 9000

  • ISO/IEC 12207

  • ISO/IEC 15504

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)

  • ISO/IEC 15288

  • ISO 26262

  • IEEE Standards

  • SWEBOK

  • PMBOK

  • Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

TermDefinitionSource
MDDModule Design Document
DFDData Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #TitleVersion
1AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mapping (Link:AUTOSAR_SWS_MemoryMapping.pdf)v1.3.0 R4.0 Rev 2
2MDD GuidelineProcess release 04.02.01
3Software Naming Conventions.docProcess release 04.02.01
4Software Design and Coding Standards.docProcess release 04.02.01
5FDD : SF013A_PullCmpActv_DesignSee Synergy sub project version

3 - PullCmpActv_Review


Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Davinci Files
Source Code
MDD
PolySpace
Integration Manual


Sheet 1: Summary Sheet
























Rev 1.28-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet




























Synergy Project Name:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. SF013A_PullCmpActv_Impl
Revision / Baseline:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. SF013A_PullCmpActv_Impl_1.2.0



























Change Owner:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Sarika Natu
Work CR ID:


EA4#4186





























kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:








































































































































































kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:






















































Reviewed:
































MDD



Source Code



PolySpace










































Integration Manual



Davinci Files








































































Comments:






























































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.





















Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows










Comments:



naming convention





































Project contains necessary subprojects










Comments:










































Project contains the correct version of subprojects










Comments:










































Design subproject is correct version










Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Sarika Natu


Review Date :



































Lead Peer Reviewer:






Approved by Reviewer(s):




































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 3: Davinci Files






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Davinci Review)


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Only StdDef Port types are used








Yes
Comments:










































For components not using application data types, do all








N/A
Comments:



port interface names end in PortIf and a sequence number





























































Non-program-specific components saved








Yes
Comments:




in Autosar 4.0.3 format




































*Cfg.arxml.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator imported the








N/A
Comments:




change correctly




































*Cfg.h.TT: Verfied Davinci Configurator generates








N/A
Comments:










the configuration header(s) file correctly
kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify



























kzshz2: Either a generic sandbox or a baselined integration project can be used to verify
















All changed files have been compared against previous








Yes
Comments:




versions (If available)

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify if previous version was compared and only the expected change(s) was present. This is for text files only, not binary or GUIs Rationale: This is helpful in identifying unapproved (intended or mistaken) changes.


































Automated validation check is performed








Yes
Comments:

























































Naming conventions followed. All names should








N/A
Comments:










match DataDict.m













































Sender/Receiver port properties match DataDict.m








Yes
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Calibration port properties match DataDict.m








Yes
Comments:










file (use .m file helper tool)













































Components using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file














































Calibration port initialization values match







N/A
Comments:










DataDict.m file













































Components not using application data types:























Sender/Receiver port initialization values match







Yes
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Calibration port initialization values match







Yes
Comments:










DataDict.m file and have been converted to counts






















for fixed point types














































Mapping set and all unused items have been







N/A
Comments:










removed













































All sender/receiver port read/writes using direct








Yes
Comments:










read/writes(List justification if not)













































Runnable calling frequencies match FDD








N/A
Comments:

































DataDict.m display variables: created as








N/A
Comments:









PerInstanceMemory. Matches the FDD





































Component is correct component type








N/A
Comments:











































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Sarika Natu
Review Date :



Component Type :































Lead Peer Reviewer:




Approved by Reviewer(s):






































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 4: Source Code






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


PullCmpActv.c

Source File Revision:


4
Header File Name:


NA

Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this. NA

























MDD Name:

PullCmpActv_MDD

Revision:
3

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




SF013A_PullCmpActv_Design

Revision:
1.6.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







N/A
Comments:

















































for constant names







N/A
Comments:

















































for function names







N/A
Comments:

















































for other names (component, memory







N/A
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)




































All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








N/A
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD








N/A
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD











Requirements tracing is not done in FDD
























All variables are declared at the function level.








N/A
Comments:
























Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:



and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








N/A
Comments:
























All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








N/A
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version:

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







Yes
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







N/A
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]





































Code formatting (indentation, placement of







Yes
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







N/A
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]





































Memory mapping for non-RTE code







N/A
Comments:










is per standard





































All execution-order-dependent code can be







N/A
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







N/A
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]





































All divides protect against divide by zero







N/A
Comments:










if needed: [N65]





































All integer division and modulus operations







N/A
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]





































All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







N/A
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and













timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







N/A
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]





































All conversions between signed and unsigned







N/A
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]





































All pointer dereferencing protects against







N/A
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







N/A
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]





































All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







Yes
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








N/A
Comments: CR no.: 4186









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:

































































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Sarika Natu


Review Date :



































Lead Peer Reviewer:






Approved by Reviewer(s):




































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 5: MDD






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (MDD Review)


























MDD Name:

PullCmpActv_MDD













MDD Revision:

3


























Source File Name:


PullCmpActv.c











Source File Revision:


4

Source File Name:


NA











Source File Revision:


NA

Source File Name:


NA











Source File Revision:


NA


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Synergy version matches document








Yes
Comments:

















Initial version


























Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:













































Changes Highlighted (for Unit Tester)








Yes
Comments:

















Initial version


























Diagrams have been included per MDD Guideline








Yes
Comments:











and reviewed






































All Design Exceptions and Limitations are listed








Yes
Comments:



















































Design rationale given for all global








Yes
Comments:











data not communicated through RTE ports, per














Design and Coding Standards rules [N9] and [N10].















































All implementation details that differ from the FDD are








Yes
Comments:











noted and explained in Design Rationale






































All Unit Test Considerations have been described








N/A
Comments:



















































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Sarika Natu


Review Date :



































Lead Peer Reviewer:






Approved by Reviewer(s):




































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 6: PolySpace






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)


























Source File Name:


PullCmpActv.c











Source File Revision:


4

Source File Name:


NA











Source File Revision:


NA

Source File Name:


NA











Source File Revision:


NA


























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:







01.01.00













Poly Space version:


Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013b
Polyspace sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0 NA

QAC version:


Windows User: eg 8.1.1-R 8.1.1-R
QAC sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL_100A_1.1.0 TL100A_QACSuprt_1.2.0


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No



































Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and





kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.


Yes
Comments:




function prototypes match the latest component version







































100% Compliance to the EA4 Static AnalysisYes
Comments:





Compliance Guideline





























Are previously added justification and deviation








Yes
Comments:





comments still appropriate






































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved








Yes
Comments:





deviation tags






































Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK






Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

Yes
Comments:





for all functions in the component per Design














and Coding Standards rule [N47]

































































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Sarika Natu


Review Date :



































Lead Peer Reviewer:






Approved by Reviewer(s):




































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 7: Integration Manual






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Integration Manual Review)


























Integration Manual Name:



kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which file is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this sheet is not attached to the wrong design review form. PullCmpActv_IntegrationManual

Integration Manual Revision:



kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the integration manual has been reviewed. Rationale: Required for traceability between the MDD and review. Auditors will likely require this. 1





























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Synergy version matches header








Yes
Comments:
















Initial version
























Latest template used








Yes
Comments:










































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:
















Initial version
























Changes Highlighted (for Integrator)








N/A
Comments:
















Initial version

























General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Sarika Natu


Review Date :



































Lead Peer Reviewer:






Approved by Reviewer(s):




































Other Reviewer(s):