1 - requirements

FDDIDSourceFunctionLine(s)StatusComment
.SwFileName.SwFuncName.SwLines.SwStatus.SwComment
SF033A56VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1294I
SF033A112VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLatA464I
SF033A98VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehYawRate,VehSigCdng_LatAEstmn534,565-574I
SF033A115VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1299I
SF033A61VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1291I
SF033A62VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehSpd363I
SF033A63VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLgtA418I
SF033A111VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLgtA413I
SF033A110VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehSpd358I
SF033A113VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehYawRate518I
SF033A103VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLatA461I
SF033A82VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1296I
SF033A83VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1297I
SF033A80VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1293I
SF033A81VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1295I
SF033A86VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLgtA429I
SF033A87VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLatA476I
SF033A84VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehYawRate523I
SF033A85VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLatA,VehSigCdng_VehYawRate472,522I
SF033A108VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLatA475I
SF033A104VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehYawRate516I
SF033A9VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1256I
SF033A68VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehSpd,VehSigCdng_LatAEstmn378,587I
SF033A146VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehSpd339-352I
SF033A97VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_LatAEstmn576-588I
SF033A120VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1263I
SF033A121VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1264I
SF033A122VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1265I
SF033A74VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1258I
SF033A73VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLgtA410I
SF033A72VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehSpd355I
SF033A70VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehSpd369I
SF033A91VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLatA484I
SF033A90VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLgtA421I
SF033A106VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehSpd367I
SF033A107VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLgtA420I
SF033A79VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1262I
SF033A78VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1261I
SF033A11VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1290I
SF033A60VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehSpd364I
SF033A39VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1292I
SF033A114VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1298I
SF033A33VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1255I
SF033A30VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehSpd339-352I
SF033A75VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1260I
SF033A34VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1257I
SF033A99VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehYawRate,VehSigCdng_LatAEstmn526,576-588I
SF033A55VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdngPer1259I
SF033A109VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehYawRate525I
SF033A64VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLgtA417I
SF033A65VehSigCdng.cVehSigCdng_VehLatA473I

2 - VehSigCdng_DesignReview


Overview

Summary Sheet
Synergy Project
Source Code
MDD
PolySpace


Sheet 1: Summary Sheet
























Rev 1.28-Jun-15

Peer Review Summary Sheet


























Synergy Project Name:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which component is being reviewed. This should be the Module Short Name from Synergy Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. SF033A_VehSigCdng_Impl
Revision / Baseline:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which Synergy revision of this component is being reviewed Rationale: Required for traceability. It will help to ensure this form is not attaced to the the wrong change request. 2.2.0

























Change Owner:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Spandana Balani
Work CR ID:


EA4#7656





























kzshz2: Intended Use: Intended to identify at a high level to the reviewers which areas of the component have been changed. Rationale: This will be good information to know when ensuring appropriate reviews have been completed. Modified File Types:















































































































































































kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:






















































Reviewed:































YesMDD


YesSource Code


YesPolySpace









































N/AIntegration Manual


N/ADavinci Files








































































Comments:

Only reviewed changes



























































































General Guidelines:
- The reviews shall be performed over the portions of the component that were modified as a result of the Change Request.
- New components should include FDD Owner and Integrator as apart of the Group Review Board (Source Code, Integration Manual, and Davinci Files)
- Enter any rework required into the comment field and select No. When the rework is complete, review again using this same review sheet and select Yes. Add date and additional comment stating that the rework is completed.
- To review a component with multiple source code files use the "Add Source" button to create a Source code tab for each source file.
- .h file should be reviewed with the source file as part of the source file.





















Sheet 2: Synergy Project

Peer Review Meeting Log (Component Synergy Project Review)



















































Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










New baseline version name from Summary Sheet follows








Yes
Comments:



naming convention





































Project contains necessary subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Project contains the correct version of subprojects








Yes
Comments:










































Design subproject is correct version








Yes
Comments:











































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Spandana Balani


Review Date :

09/20/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick Saxton


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 3: Source Code






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (Source Code Review)

























Source File Name:


VehSigCdng.c

Source File Revision:


6
Header File Name:





Header File Revision:


kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify which version of the source file is being review. Rationale: Required for traceability between source code and review. Auditors will likely require this.

























MDD Name:

VehSigCdng_Module Design Document.docx

Revision:
3

























FDD/SCIR/DSR/FDR/CM Name:




SF033A_VehSigCdng_Design

Revision:
2.2.0


























Quality Check Items:



































Rationale is required for all answers of No









Working EA4 Software Naming Convention followed:















































for variable names







Yes
Comments:

















































for constant names







N/A
Comments:

















































for function names







N/A
Comments:

















































for other names (component, memory







N/A
Comments:










mapping handles, typedefs, etc.)




































All paths assign a value to outputs, ensuring








Yes
Comments:









all outputs are initialized prior to being written





































Requirements Tracability tags in code match the requirements tracability in the FDD








N/A
Comments:









requirements tracability in the FDD





































All variables are declared at the function level.








Yes
Comments:
























Synergy version matches change history





kzshz2: Intended Use: Indicate that the the versioning was confirmed by the peer reviewer(s). Rationale: There have been many occassions where versions were not updated in files and as a result Unit Test were referencing wrong versions. This often time leads to the need to re-run of batch tests.


Yes
Comments:



and Version Control version in file comment block





































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:



and Work CR number





































Code accurately implements FDD (Document or Model)








Yes
Comments:










































Verified no Compiler Errors or Warnings


KMC: Intended Use: To confirm no compiler errors or warnings exist for the code under review (warnings from contract header files may be ignored). Rationale: This is needed to ensure there will be no errors discovered at the time of integration. A Sandox project should be used; QAC can find compiler errors but not warnings.





Yes
Comments:
















































Component.h is included








N/A
Comments:
























All other includes are actually needed. (System includes








Yes
Comments:









only allowed in Nexteer library components)





































Software Design and Coding Standards followed:











Version: 2.1

























Code comments are clear, correct, and adequate







Yes
Comments:










and have been updated for the change: [N40] and













all other rules in the same section as rule [N40],






















plus [N75], [N12], [N23], [N33], [N37], [N38],






















[N48], [N54], [N77], [N79], [N72]














































Source file (.c and .h) comment blocks are per







Yes
Comments:










standards and contain correct information: [N41], [N42]





































Function comment blocks are per standards and







Yes
Comments:










contain correct information: [N43]





































Code formatting (indentation, placement of







Yes
Comments:










braces, etc.) is per standards: [N5], [N55], [N56],













[N57], [N58], [N59]














































Embedded constants used per standards; no







N/A
Comments:










"magic numbers": [N12]





































Memory mapping for non-RTE code







N/A
Comments:










is per standard










No non-RTE code

























All execution-order-dependent code can be







N/A
Comments:










recognized by the compiler: [N80]





































All loops have termination conditions that ensure







N/A
Comments:










finite loop iterations: [N63]





































All divides protect against divide by zero







N/A
Comments:










if needed: [N65]





































All integer division and modulus operations







N/A
Comments:










handle negative numbers correctly: [N76]





































All typecasting and fixed point arithmetic,







N/A
Comments:










including all use of fixed point macros and













timer functions, is correct and has no possibility






















of unintended overflow or underflow: [N66]














































All float-to-unsiged conversions ensure the.







N/A
Comments:










float value is non-negative: [N67]





































All conversions between signed and unsigned







N/A
Comments:










types handle msb==1 as intended: [N78]





































All pointer dereferencing protects against







N/A
Comments:










null pointer if needed: [N70]





































Component outputs are limited to the legal range







N/A
Comments:










defined in the FDD DataDict.m file : [N53]





































All code is mapped with FDD (all FDD







Yes
Comments:










subfunctions and/or model blocks identified













with code comments; all code corresponds to






















some FDD subfunction and/or model block): [N40]













































Review did not identify violations of other








Yes
Comments:









coding standard rules





































Anomaly or Design Work CR created








N/A
Comments: List Anomaly or CR numbers









for any FDD corrections needed































































General Notes / Comments:

















































































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Spandana Balani


Review Date :

09/20/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick Saxton


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 4: MDD






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (MDD Review)


























MDD Name:

VehSigCdng_Module Design Document.docx
MDD Revision:

3


























Source File Name:


VehSigCdng.cSource File Revision:


6

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:





Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No










Synergy version matches document








Yes
Comments:













































Change log contains detailed description of changes








Yes
Comments:













































Changes Highlighted (for Unit Tester)








Yes
Comments:













































Diagrams have been included per MDD Guideline








N/A
Comments:











and reviewed






































All Design Exceptions and Limitations are listed








N/A
Comments:



















































Design rationale given for all global








N/A
Comments:











data not communicated through RTE ports, per














Design and Coding Standards rules [N9] and [N10].















































All implementation details that differ from the FDD are








N/A
Comments:











noted and explained in Design Rationale






































All Unit Test Considerations have been described








N/A
Comments:



















































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Spandana Balani


Review Date :

09/20/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick Saxton


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):










































































Sheet 5: PolySpace






















Rev 1.28-Jun-15
Peer Review Meeting Log (QAC/PolySpace Review)


























Source File Name:


VehSigCdng.cSource File Revision:


6

Source File Name:















Source File Revision:





Source File Name:















Source File Revision:






























EA4 Static Analysis Compliance Guideline version:







01.01.00







Poly Space version:


Windows User: eg. 2013b 2013b
Polyspace sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL108a_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0 TL108A_PolyspaceSuprt_1.0.0

QAC version:


Windows User: eg 8.1.1-R 8.1.1-R
QAC sub project version:




Windows User: eg. TL_100A_1.1.0 TL100A_QACSuprt_1.2.0


























Quality Check Items:




































Rationale is required for all answers of No



































Contract Folder's header files are appropriate and





kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify that the contract folder contains only the information required for this component. All other variables, constants, function prototypes, etc. should be removed. Rationale: This will help avoid unit testers having to considers object not used. It will also avoid having other files required for QAC.


Yes
Comments:




function prototypes match the latest component version







































100% Compliance to the EA4 Static AnalysisYes
Comments:





Compliance Guideline





























Are previously added justification and deviation








Yes
Comments:





comments still appropriate






































Do all MISRA deviation comments use approved








Yes
Comments:





deviation tags






































Cyclomatic complexity and Static path count OK






Creager, Kathleen: use Browse Function Metrics, STCYC and STPTH

Yes
Comments:





for all functions in the component per Design














and Coding Standards rule [N47]

































































































General Notes / Comments:



























































LN: Intended Use: Identify who were the reviewers and if the reviewed changes have been approved. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. KMC: Group Review Level removed in Rev 4.0 since the design review is not checked in until approved, so it would always be DR4. Review Board:


























Change Owner:

Spandana Balani


Review Date :

09/20/16
































Lead Peer Reviewer:


Nick Saxton


Approved by Reviewer(s):



Yes































Other Reviewer(s):









































































3 - VehSigCdng_Integration Manual

Integration Manual

For

VehSigCdng

VERSION: 1.0

DATE: 13-July-2015

Prepared By:

Spandana Balani

Location: The official version of this document is stored in the Nexteer Configuration Management System.

Revision History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial versionSB1.013-jul-2015

Table of Contents

1 Abbrevations And Acronyms 4

2 References 5

3 Dependencies 6

3.1 SWCs 6

3.2 Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project 6

4 Configuration REQUIREMeNTS 7

4.1 Build Time Config 7

4.2 Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project 7

4.3 Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes 7

4.4 DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes 7

4.5 Manual Configuration Changes 7

5 Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS 8

5.1 Required Global Data Inputs 8

5.2 Required Global Data Outputs 8

5.3 file Specific Include Path present 8

6 Runnable Scheduling 9

7 Memory Map REQUIREMENTS 10

7.1 Mapping 10

7.2 Usage 10

7.3 NvM Blocks 10

8 Compiler Settings 11

8.1 Preprocessor MACRO 11

8.2 Optimization Settings 11

9 Appendix 12

Abbrevations And Acronyms

AbbreviationDescription
DFDDesign functional diagram
MDDModule design Document
<ADD more to the table if applicable>

References

This section lists the title & version of all the documents that are referred for development of this document

Sr. No.TitleVersion
<1><MDD Guidelines>Process 4.01.00
<2><Software Naming Conventions>Process 4.01.00
<3><Coding standards>Process 4.01.00
<4><FDD SF033A_VehSigCdng_Design >See Synergy Subproject version

Dependencies

SWCs

ModuleRequired Feature
NoneN/A

Note : Referencing the external components should be avoided in most cases. Only in unavoidable circumstance external components should be referred. Developer should track the references.

Global Functions(Non RTE) to be provided to Integration Project

None

Configuration REQUIREMeNTS

Build Time Config

ConstantsNotes
FLTINJENASet to STD_ON for Fault injection

Configuration Files to be provided by Integration Project

Include NxtrFil.h in Rte_UserTypes.h header file.

Da Vinci Parameter Configuration Changes

ParameterNotesSWC
N/A

DaVinci Interrupt Configuration Changes

ISR NameVIM #Priority DependencyNotes
N/A

Manual Configuration Changes

ConstantNotesSWC
N/A

Integration DATAFLOW REQUIREMENTS

Required Global Data Inputs

Refer DataDict.m file

Required Global Data Outputs

Refer DataDict.m file

file Specific Include Path present

No

Runnable Scheduling

This section specifies the required runnable scheduling.

InitScheduling RequirementsTrigger
VehSigCdngInit1On InitRte_Init
RunnableScheduling RequirementsTrigger
VehSigCdngPer1NoneRTE(2ms)

.

Memory Map REQUIREMENTS

Mapping

Memory SectionContentsNotes
None

* Each …START_SEC… constant is terminated by a …STOP_SEC… constant as specified in the AUTOSAR Memory Mapping requirements.

Usage

FeatureRAMROM
None

Table 1: ARM Cortex R4 Memory Usage

NvM Blocks

None

Compiler Settings

Preprocessor MACRO

None

Optimization Settings

None

Appendix

None

4 - VehSigCdng_Module Design Document

Module Design Document

For

VehSigCdng

Sep 20, 2016

Prepared For:

Software Engineering

Nexteer Automotive,

Saginaw, MI, USA

Prepared By:

Spandana Balani
Change History

Sl. No.DescriptionAuthorVersionDate
1Initial VersionSB113-Jul-2015
2Updated for FDD v2.0.0NS22-Jun-2016
3Updated for FDD v2.2.0SB320-Sep-2016

Table of Contents

1 Introduction 4

1.1 Purpose 4

1.2 Scope 4

2 VehSigCdng High-Level Description 5

3 Design details of software module 6

3.1 Graphical representation of VehSigCdng 6

3.2 Data Flow Diagram 8

3.2.1 Component level DFD 8

3.2.2 Function level DFD 8

4 Constant Data Dictionary 9

4.1 Program (fixed) Constants 9

4.1.1 Embedded Constants 9

5 Software Component Implementation 10

5.1.1 Sub-Module Functions 10

5.1.2 Interrupt Service Routines 10

5.1.3 Server Runnable Functions 10

5.1.4 Module Internal (Local) Functions 10

5.1.5 Transition Functions 11

6 Known Limitations with Design 13

7 UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION 14

Appendix A Abbreviations and Acronyms 15

Appendix B Glossary 16

Appendix C References 17

Introduction

Purpose

Scope

VehSigCdng High-Level Description

Refer to FDD

Design details of software module

Graphical representation of VehSigCdng

Data Flow Diagram

Component level DFD

Refer to FDD

Function level DFD

Refer to FDD

Constant Data Dictionary

Program (fixed) Constants

Embedded Constants

Local Constants

See .m file

Software Component Implementation

Sub-Module Functions

Initialization sub-module VehSigCdngInit1()

Periodic sub-module VehSigCdngPer1()

Design Rationale - Fault Injection client call is conditional compiled based on “FLTINJENA” build constant.

Interrupt Service Routines

None

Server Runnable Functions

None

Module Internal (Local) Functions

Local Function #1

Refer to VehSpd block in the model

Function NameVehSigCdng_VehSpdTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedVehSpdSerlCom_Kph_T_f32Float320511
VehSpdVldSerlCom_Cnt_T_lgcBooleanFALSETRUE
VehSpdOvrd_Kph_T_f32Float320511
VehSpdOvrdVld_Cnt_T_loglBooleanFALSETRUE
VehSpd_Kph_T_f32Float320511
VehSpdVld_Cnt_T_loglBooleanFALSETRUE
Return ValueN/A

Notes: VehSpd_Kph_T_f32, VehSpdVld_Cnt_T_logl are the outputs of the function

Local Function #2

Refer to VehLgtA block in the model

Function NameVehSigCdng_VehLgtATypeMinMax
Arguments PassedVehLgtASerlCom_MpSecSq_T_f32Float32-180180
VehLgtAVldSerlCom_Cnt_T_lgcBooleanFALSETRUE
VehLgtA_KphpS_T_f32Float32-5050
VehLgtAVld_Cnt_T_loglBooleanFALSETRUE
Return Value(if no value returned, write N/A)

Notes: VehLgtA_KphpS_T_f32, VehLgtAVld_Cnt_T_logl are the outputs of the function

Local Function #3

Refer to VehLatA block in the model

Function NameVehSigCdng_VehLatATypeMinMax
Arguments PassedVehLatASerlCom_MpSecSq_T_f32Float32-1010
VehLatAVldSerlCom_Cnt_T_lgcBooleanFALSETRUE
VehLatA_MpSecSq_T_f32Float32-1010
VehLatAVld_Cnt_T_loglBooleanFALSETRUE
Return Value(if no value returned, write N/A)

Notes: VehLatA_MpSecSq_T_f32, VehLatAVld_Cnt_T_logl are the outputs of the function

Local Function #4

Refer to VehYawRate block in the model

Function NameVehSigCdng_VehYawRateTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedVehYawRateSerlCom_DegpS_T_f32Float32-120120
VehYawRateVldSerlCom_Cnt_T_lgcBooleanFALSETRUE
VehYawRate_DegpS_T_f32Float32-120120
VehYawRateVld_Cnt_T_loglBooleanFALSETRUE
Return Value(if no value returned, write N/A)

Notes: VehYawRate_DegpS_T_f32, VehYawRateVld_Cnt_T_logl are the outputs of the function

Local Function #5

Refer to “Lateral Acceleration Estimation” block in the model

Function NameVehSigCdng_LatAEstmnTypeMinMax
Arguments PassedVehYawRate_DegpS_T_f32Float32-120120
VehYawRateVld_Cnt_T_lgcBooleanFALSETRUE
VehSpd_Kph_T_f32Float320511
VehSpdVld_Cnt_T_loglBooleanFALSETRUE
VehLatAEstimd_MtrPerSecSqd_T_f32Float32-1010
VehLatAEstimdVld_Cnt_T_loglBooleanFALSETRUE
Return Value(if no value returned, write N/A)

Notes: VehLatAEstimd_MtrPerSecSqd_T_f32, VehLatAEstimdVld_Cnt_T_logl are the outputs of the function

Transition Functions

None

Known Limitations with Design

None

UNIT TEST CONSIDERATION

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation or AcronymDescription

Glossary

Note: Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” take precedence over all other definitions of the same term. Terms and definitions from the source “Nexteer Automotive” are formulated from multiple sources, including the following:

  • ISO 9000

  • ISO/IEC 12207

  • ISO/IEC 15504

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model (PRM)

  • Automotive SPICE® Process Assessment Model (PAM)

  • ISO/IEC 15288

  • ISO 26262

  • IEEE Standards

  • SWEBOK

  • PMBOK

  • Existing Nexteer Automotive documentation

TermDefinitionSource
MDDModule Design Document
DFDData Flow Diagram

References

Ref. #TitleVersion
1AUTOSAR Specification of Memory Mapping (Link:AUTOSAR_SWS_MemoryMapping.pdf)v1.3.0 R4.0 Rev 2
2MDD GuidelineEA4 01.00.00
3Software Naming Conventions.doc2.0
4Software Design and Coding Standards.doc2.1
5FDD – SF033A_VehSigCdng_DesignSee Synergy Sub project version