Component Integration Review Checklist

Rev 1.0

3/10/2014

Component Integration Review Sheet

Change Owner:

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify the developer who made the change(s) Rationale: A change request may have more than one resolver, this will help identify who made what change. Change owner identification may be required by indusrty standards. Jared Julien

Change Request ID:

Many, see individual tabs

Integration Steps

kzshz2: Intended Use: Identify who where the reviewers, what they reviewed, and if the reviewed changes have been approved to release the code for testing. Comments here should be at a highlevel, the specific comments should be present on the specific review form sheet. Rationale: Since this Form will be attached to the Change Request it will confirm the approval and provides feedback in case of audits. ADD DR Level Move reviewer and approval to individual checklist form Review Checklist Summary:

Comments:

The calibration section was altered from the approved review checklist to better suit the process used by EA4. Tab Colors: Green: Reviewed and passing for this release Gray: Reviewed and pssing on previous release

General Guidelines:

- The reviews should be performed over the steps taken to integrate each of the SWC. - If a section does not apply, select "N/A" in the Yes column and state why it did not apply.

Abbreviations and Acronyms

- CIG: Component Integration Guidlines.

References

Document Title

Version

Applicable Sections

[1]

Component Integration Guidelines

Version 1.2

All