ES005A_TmplMonr_FR_Review

Nexteer_Template_V1.0

Overview

Peer Review Instructions
Technical Review Checklist


Sheet 1: Peer Review Instructions

Instructions for Functional Requirements Peer Review




PRE-MEETING


Function OwnerConfirm the requirements are completed and frozen prior to the review (no changes after initiating)

Function OwnerStart with latest version of the template for any "first reviews" - Continue to use existing template for re-reviews

Function OwnerProvide the functional requirements (changed documents) to the invited attendees 1-2 working days in advance of review

Function OwnerNotify the assigned peer reviewer and make sure they are prepared to do their function in the meeting

Function OwnerIdentify necessary attendance and invite to meeting

Function OwnerComplete the "Author" column information for sections 1 through 3 prior to the review

Function OwnerComplete the attendance invitation list in section 5

Function OwnerFor Re-reviews only: Complete the column "remarks by author" to identify actions taken to address items found in earlier reviews.



DURING MEETING


Function OwnerPresent document changes to the review team

Peer ReviewerCapture attendance of the review

Peer ReviewerCapture Review Date, Review Action, Review Action Status during the review

Peer ReviewerCapture actions and issues in section 4. Identify issue summary, Document type, Reference (Requirement ID, section number, etc), Defect Type and indicate status as "OPEN"



POST MEETING


Function OwnerFollow up on all "open" items. Update "Summary of Resolution" to indicate what was done or decided.

Function OwnerSchedule follow up review OR review open items with peer reviewer and obtain agreement to close

Peer ReviewerClose change request in system and confirm all associated tasks are complete. Upload peer review checklist (this document) with any FR updates

Sheet 2: Technical Review Checklist

Technical Review Checklist - Template Version 01.00.00







Product NameElectric Power SteeringElectrical Arch.4Review ScopeDefect TypeNumbers




YesClosedFR
Function NameES005A Temporal MonitorTarget Version2.3Added requirment for SysFlt2A and 2BIncorrect Requirement0




NoRejectedFDD
AuthorRaghavendran Mohan

Ambiguous0




NAOpenModel


EffortConflicting0






FMEA


Review Effort(Hrs.)1.00Incorrect Format0






*.m File


Corr+Verf effort(Hrs.)0.00
0






Cal Process


Total Effort (Hrs.)1.00Others0













Total0







Checklist No.Description of CheckAuthor: This column is for Self review. Author shall fill Yes/No/NA against each point in checklist. AuthorAuthor: This column is for reviewer. Reviewer shall fill Yes/No/NA against each point in checklist. ReviewerAuthor: Detailed Description of the finding shall be provided by the reviewer. Description of finding by reviewerAuthor: Defect type to be selected. Defect TypeAuthor: What action is taken to fix the comment & other remarks need to be filled by author. Remarks By AuthorAuthor: Data in this column shall be filled by reviewer after checking whether the rework is completed. Status







1Section 1: TECHNICAL CHECK













1.1All requirements indicated by setting "Is Requirement" attribute to TRUEYes












1.2All requirements start with "The "function" shall…"Yes












1.3All IO to the function have been describedYes












1.4All reviewed requirements documented in the DOORs attributes for review (Review Date, Review Action, Review Action Status)Yes












1.5














2Section 2: Safety CHECKAuthor: This column is for Self review. Author shall fill Yes/No/NA against each point in checklist. AuthorAuthor: This column is for reviewer. Reviewer shall fill Yes/No/NA against each point in checklist. ReviewerAuthor: Detailed Description of the finding shall be provided by the reviewer. Description of finding by reviewerAuthor: Defect type to be selected. Defect TypeAuthor: What action is taken to fix the comment & other remarks need to be filled by author. Remarks By AuthorAuthor: Data in this column shall be filled by reviewer after checking whether the rework is completed. Status







2.1All "Is Requirements" attributes set to TRUE have a completed ASIL attribute identifiedYes












2.2














3Section 3: Lessons LearnedAuthor: This column is for Self review. Author shall fill Yes/No/NA against each point in checklist. AuthorAuthor: This column is for reviewer. Reviewer shall fill Yes/No/NA against each point in checklist. ReviewerAuthor: Detailed Description of the finding shall be provided by the reviewer. Description of finding by reviewerAuthor: Defect type to be selected. Defect TypeAuthor: What action is taken to fix the comment & other remarks need to be filled by author. Remarks By AuthorAuthor: Data in this column shall be filled by reviewer after checking whether the rework is completed. Status







3.1














3.2














4Section 4: Issues / Actions IdentifiedDocumentReferenceSummary of resolutionAuthor: Defect type to be selected. Defect TypeAuthor: What action is taken to fix the comment & other remarks need to be filled by author. Remarks By AuthorAuthor: Data in this column shall be filled by reviewer after checking whether the rework is completed. Status







4.1














4.2














4.3














4.4














4.5














4.6














4.7














4.8














4.9














4.10














4.11














4.12














4.13














4.14














4.15














4.16














4.17














4.18














4.19














4.20














4.21














4.22














4.23














4.24














4.25














5Section 5: APPROVALS













RoleFirst ReviewDateAttendanceApproval?










Function Owner*
Raghavendran Mohan
11/28/2016YesYes










Peer Reviewer*Sai DesuYes










EPDT Engineer<Name - if invited>











ES Engineer












Software LeadJayakrishnan ThundathilYes










Hardware Lead<Name - if invited>











Test LeadPooja KusnoorYes










Safety Lead<Name - if invited>











RoleSecond Review (if required)DateAttendanceApproval?










Function Owner*














Peer Reviewer*













EPDT Engineer<Name - if invited>












ES Engineer<Name - if invited>












Software Lead<Name - if invited>












Hardware Lead<Name - if invited>












Test Lead<Name - if invited>












Safety Lead<Name - if invited>












RoleThird Review (if required)DateAttendanceApproval?










Function Owner*<Owner Name>













Peer Reviewer*<Name>












EPDT Engineer<Name - if invited>












ES Engineer<Name - if invited>












Software Lead<Name - if invited>












Hardware Lead<Name - if invited>












Test Lead<Name - if invited>












Safety Lead<Name - if invited>












RoleFourth Review (if required)DateAttendanceApproval?










Function Owner*<Owner Name>













Peer Reviewer*<Name>












EPDT Engineer<Name - if invited>












ES Engineer<Name - if invited>












Software Lead<Name - if invited>












Hardware Lead<Name - if invited>












Test Lead<Name - if invited>












Safety Lead<Name - if invited>












RoleAdd more if necessaryDateAttendanceApproval?










































P.S.:Yes indicates adherence














No indicates non-adherence, reviewer shall provide suitable comments at the end of this document for each point.














NA indicates not applicable













Last modified October 12, 2025: Initial commit (312cf32)